Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:53:02.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Remarks on the 1989 revision of the International Phonetic Alphabet

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Geoffrey K. Pullum
Affiliation:
Cowell College, University of California, Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Block, B., and Trager, G. L.. (1942). Outline of Linguistic Analysis. Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Doke, C. M. (1931). A Comparative Study in Shona Phonetics. Johannesburg: University of the Witwatersrand.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association. (1989). Report on the Kiel Convention. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, 19(2): 6780.Google Scholar
Maddieson, I. (1984). Patterns of Sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinkerton, S. (1986). Quichean (Mayan) glottalized and nonglottalized stops: a phonetic study with implications for phonological universals. In Ohala, J. J. and Jaeger, J. J. (editors), Experimental Phonology, 125139. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pullum, G. K. and Ladusaw, W. A.. (1986). Phonetic Symbol Guide. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sampson, G. (1974). Is there a universal phonetic alphabet? Language, 50: 236259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, W. A. (1963). Manual of Articulatory Phonetics. Tarrytown: Practical Anthropology.Google Scholar
Wells, J. (1982). Accents of English, volume 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar