No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Problems in the transcription of dysfluent speech
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 06 February 2009
Extract
Clinical phoneticians and speech pathologists often face difficulties in transcription of a different nature from those which the general phonetician encounters. A wide range of speech disorders present at the clinic (see Crystal 1980, 1981, 1984), and in many cases a detailed phonetic description of speech is an important part of the analysis and diagnosis of a person's problem (see Carney 1979, on the dangers of inadequate description).
- Type
- Educational Phonetics
- Information
- Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1988 , pp. 152 - 155
- Copyright
- Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1988
References
Ball, M.J. (1988a). A diacritic range for phonation types. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 18(1), 39–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ball, M.J. (1988b). The contribution of speech pathology to development of phonetic description. In Ball, M. (editor), Theoretical Linguistics and Disordered Language. London: Croom Helm, 168–88.Google Scholar
Ball, M.J. (1988c). The transcription of phonation types. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 2, 253–6.Google Scholar
Beattie, G.W. (1983). Talk: An Analysis of Speech and Non-Verbal Behaviour in Conversation. Milton Keynes: Open University Press.Google Scholar
Carney, E. (1979). Inappropriate abstraction in speech-assessment procedures. British Journal of Disorders of Human Communication 14, 123–35.Google Scholar
Code, C. and Ball, M.J. (editors) (1984). Experimental Clinical Phonetics. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Code, C. and Ball, M.J. (1988). Apraxia of speech: the case for a cognitive phonetics. In Ball, M.J. (editor), Theoretical Linguistics and Disordered Language. London: Croom Helm, 152–67.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1984). Linguistic Encounters with Language Handicap. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1987). Towards a ‘bucket’ theory of language disability: taking account of interaction between linguistic levels. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 1, 7–22.Google Scholar
Dalton, P. and Hardcastle, W.J. (1977). Disorders of Fluency and their Effects on Communication. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Davies, P. and Mehan, H. (1988). Professional and family understanding of impaired communication. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 23, 141–51.Google Scholar
Goldman-Eisler, F. (1968). Psycholinguistics: Experiments in Spontaneous Speech. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Grunwell, P. and Russell, J. (1987). Vocalisations before and after cleft palate surgery: a pilot study. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 22, 1–17.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980). The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
McClay, H. and Osgood, C.E. (1959). Hesitation phenomena in spontaneous English speech. Word 15, 19–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mlcoch, A. and Noll, J. (1980). Speech production models as related to the concept of apraxia of speech. In Lass, N.J. (editor) Speech and Language: Advances in Basic Research and Practice, Vol. 4. New York: Academic Press, 201–38.Google Scholar
Ryan, B. (1974). Programmed Therapy for Stuttering in Children and Adults. Springfield, Illinois: C.C. Thomas.Google Scholar
Shriberg, L.D. and Kent, R.D. (1982). Clinical Phonetics. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar