Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T06:03:09.617Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Polish Phonetic database: Wiktor Jassem

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

Włodzimerz Sobkowiak
Affiliation:
School of English, Adam Mickiewicz University, al. Niepodleglosci 61-874 Poznań, [email protected].

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Reviews
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Gonet, W. (2000). Phonetic features of Polish texts read for the BABEL- PL/WL Database. Speech and Language Technology 4, 2342.Google Scholar
Grocholewski, S. (1997). CORPORA - speech database for Polish diphones. In Proceedings ofEurospeech ' 97, Rhodos, Greece. 1735–38.Google Scholar
Grocholewski, S. (1998). First database for spoken Polish. In Rubio, A. et al. (editors). Proceedings of the first international conference on language resources and evaluation. Granada, Spain, 28–30 May 1998. Paris, Granada: ELRA. 1059–62.Google Scholar
Grocholewski, S. (2000). Wykorzystanie bazy nagrań CORPORA do automatycznej segmentacji zbiorów nagrań.Speech and Language Technology 4, 4355.Google Scholar
Gubrynowicz, R. (1998). The Polish database of spoken language. In Rubio, A. et al. (editors,). Proceedings of the first international conference on language resources and evaluation. Granada, Spain, 28–30 May 1998. Paris, Granada: ELRA. 1031–38.Google Scholar
Gubrynowicz, R. (1998). The Polish speech database for recognition and synthesis systems. Proceedings ofELSNETin Wonderland, Utrecht, Holland. 8794.Google Scholar
Gubrynowicz, R. (1999). Projekt i realizacja bazy danych mowy polskiej w programie BABEL. Speech and Language Technology 3, 257–75.Google Scholar