Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-17T18:08:43.222Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Place and manner assimilation in Catalan consonant clusters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 July 2015

Daniel Recasens  and
Meritxell Mira
Daniel Recasens
Affiliation:
Departament de Filologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona & Laboratori de Fonètica, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona [email protected]; [email protected]
Meritxell Mira
Affiliation:
Departament de Filologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Bellaterra, Barcelona & Laboratori de Fonètica, Institut d’Estudis Catalans, Barcelona [email protected]; [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Electropalatographic data on the frequency of occurrence of assimilatory processes in Catalan C1##C2 sequences, where ## is inserted at the boundary between two consecutive words, reveal that regressive place assimilations operate more often on C1 = /n/ than on C1 = /t/ and are triggered by /ɡ/ rather than by the labials /pbm/ and the voiceless velar stop /k/. Regressive manner assimilations involving nasality and laterality are facilitated by homorganicity between the two consecutive consonants and thus apply more frequently in the clusters /pmtntltʎ/, where C1 and C2 share the same labial or dentoalveolar place of articulation, than in the sequences /pntmkmkn/, where the two consonants are heterorganic; on the other hand, /k/ is less prone than /pt/ to become nasal when followed by /mn/. Place assimilatory processes apply more often for some speakers than for others, and their frequency of occurrence increases whenever C1 is embedded in a frequent or function word. The articulatory motivation for some of these place and manner assimilatory processes, and the extent to which they are complete or partial, are also investigated.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 45 , Issue 2 , August 2015 , pp. 115 - 147
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barry, Martin C. 1985. A palatographic study of connected speech processes. Cambridge Papers in Phonetics and Experimental Linguistics 4, 1–16.Google Scholar
Barry, Martin C. 1992. Palatalisation, assimilation and gestural weakening in connected speech processes. Speech Communication 1. 393–400.Google Scholar
Bergmann, Pia. 2012. Articulatory reduction and assimilation in n#g sequences in complex words in German. In Hoole, Philip, Bombien, Lasse, Pouplier, Marianne, Mooshammer, Christine & Kühnert, Barbara (eds.), Consonant clusters and structural complexity, 311–344. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonet, Eulàlia & Lloret, Maria Rosa. 1998. Fonologia catalana. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1991a. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston & Beckman (eds.), 341–376.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine P. & Goldstein, Louis. 1991b. Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change. In Mattingly, Ignatius G. & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael (eds.), Modularity and the Motor Theory of Speech Perception, 313–339. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani. 1996. Influences on articulatory timing in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics 24, 209–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Choi, Susi. 2010. At the juncture of prosody, phonology, and phonetics: The interaction of phrasal and syllable structure in shaping the timing of consonant gestures. In Fougeron, Cécile, Kühnert, Barbara, D’Imperio, Mariapaola & Vallée, Natalie (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 10, 31–59. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter Mouton.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Tan, C. C.. 1996. Saying clusters quickly. Journal of Phonetics 24, 263–282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calamai, Silvia & Ricci, Irene. 2010. Speech rate and articulatory patterns in Italian nasal–velar clusters. In Recasens, Daniel, Sánchez Miret, Fernando & Wireback, Kenneth J. (eds.), Experimental phonetics and sound change, 7–33. Munich: Lincom.Google Scholar
Chomsky, Noam & Halle, Morris. 1968. The sound pattern of English. New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Celata, Chiara, Calamai, Silvia, Ricci, Irene & Bertini, Chiara. 2013. Nasal place assimilation between phonetics and phonology: An EPG study of Italian nasal-to-velar clusters. Journal of Phonetics 41, 88–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dilley, Laura C. & Pitt, Mark. 2007. A study of regressive place assimilation in spontaneous speech and its implications for spoken word recognition. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 122, 2340–2353.Google Scholar
Ellis, Lucy & Hardcastle, William J.. 1999. An instrumental study of alveolar to velar assimilation in careful and fast speech. In Ohala, John J., Hasegawa, Yoko, Ohala, Manjari, Granville, Daniel & Bailey, Ashlee C. (eds.), 14th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIV), San Francisco, 2425–2428.Google Scholar
Ellis, Lucy & Hardcastle, William J.. 2002. Categorical and gradient properties of assimilation in alveolar to velar sequences: Evidence from EPG and EMA data. Journal of Phonetics 30, 373–396.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edda. 1990. V–C–V lingual coarticulation and its spatiotemporal domain. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 93–130. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edda & Busà, Maria Grazia. 1994. Italian clusters in continuous speech. The 1994 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Yokohama, 359–362.Google Scholar
Fontdevila, Jordi, Pallarès, Maria Dolors & Recasens, Daniel. 1994. The contact index method of EPG data reduction. Journal of Phonetics 22, 141–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. 1994. Assimilation of alveolar stops and nasals in connected speech. In Lewis, Jack Windsor (ed.), Studies in general and English phonetics in honor of Professor J. D. O’Connor, 49–67. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J., Jones, Wilf, Knight, Colin, Trudgeon, Ann & Calder, G.. 1989. New developments in electropalatography: A state-of-the-art report. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 3, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heselwood, Barry, Howard, Sara & Ranjous, Rawja. 2011. Assimilation of /l/ to /r/ in Syrian Arabic. In Hassan, Zeki Majeed & Heselwood, Marry (eds.), Instrumental studies in Arabic phonetics, 63–98. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Honorof, Douglas N. 1999. Articulatory gestures and Spanish nasal assimilation. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Jaeger, Marion & Hoole, Philip. 2007. Articulatory features influencing regressive place assimilation in German. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), 16th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), Saarbrücken, 581–584.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 1995. Perceptual and articulatory factors in place assimilation: An Optimality Theory approach (UCLA Occasional Papers in Linguistics, Dissertation Series 2). Los Angeles, CA: UCLA.Google Scholar
Jun, Jongho. 2004. Place assimilation. In Hayes, Bruce, Kirchner, Robert & Steriade, Donca (eds.), The phonetic bases of markedness, 377–407. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.). 1991. Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and the physics of speech, 341–376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Colantoni, Laura. 2011. Spanish nasal assimilation revisited: A cross-dialect electropalatographic study. Laboratory Phonology 2, 487–523.Google Scholar
Kohler, Klaus. 1984. Phonetic explanation in phonology: The feature fortis/lenis. Phonetica 41, 150–174.Google Scholar
Kühnert, Barbara. 1993. Some kinematic aspects of alveolar–velar assimilations. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetik und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 31, 263–272.Google Scholar
Kühnert, Barbara & Hoole, Philip. 2004. Speaker-specific kinematic properties of alveolar reduction in English and German. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 18, 559–575.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 2003. Linguistic phonetics. In Aronoff, Mark & Rees-Miller, Janie (eds.), The handbook of linguistics, 164–178. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehiste, Ilse. 1970. Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1981. Economy of speech gestures. In Macneilage, Peter (ed.), The production of speech 217–245. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1989. Explaining phonetic variation: A sketch of the H&H theory. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis. 1992. The descriptive role of segments: Evidence from assimilation. In Docherty, Gerry & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 2, 261–280. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1990. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In Kingston & Beckman (eds.), 258–275.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1997. Aerodynamics of phonology. 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (SICOL), 92–97.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Ohala, Manjari. 1993. The phonetics of nasal phonology: Theorems and data. In Huffman, Marie K. & Krakow, Rena A. (eds.), Nasals, nasalization, and the velum, 225–249. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Pfitzinger, Hartmut R. 1996. Two approaches to speech rate estimation. 6th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 421–426. Canberra: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1993. Fonètica i fonologia. Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2006. Integrating coarticulation, blending and assimilation into a model of articulatory constraints. In Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Doug & Best, Catherine (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 8, 611–634. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2008. Blending in heterosyllabic consonant clusters in three Catalan dialects. Zentrum für Allgemeine Sprachwissenschaft Papers in Linguistics 49, 79–96.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 2001. Coarticulation, blending and assimilation in Catalan consonant clusters. Journal of Phonetics 29, 273–301.Google Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1966. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Son, Minjung, Kochetov, Alexei & Pouplier, Marianne. 2007. The role of gestural overlap in perceptual place assimilation in Korean. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, José Ignacio (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9, 507–534. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Stephenson, Lisa & Harrington, Jonathan. 2002. Assimilation of place of articulation: Evidence from English and Japanese. 9th Australian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 592–597. Melbourne: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Westbury, John R. & Keating, Patricia A.. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22, 145–166.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 2005. The phonology of Catalan. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Winters, Stephen James. 2003. Empirical investigations into the perceptual and articulatory origins of cross-linguistic asymmetries in place assimilation. Ph.D. dissertation, The Ohio State University.Google Scholar
Wright, Paul & Kerswill, Susan. 1989. Electropalatography in the study of connected speech processes. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 3, 49–57.Google Scholar
Zimmerer, Frank, Reetz, Henning & Lahiri, Aditi. 2009. Place assimilation across words in running speech: Corpus analysis and perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125, 2307–2322.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth. 1994. Acoustic evidence for gestural overlap in consonant sequences. Journal of Phonetics 22, 121–140.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elizabeth. 2011. Local assimilation. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin J., Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology 3, 1919–1944. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar