Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:46:34.560Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phonetic transfer in language contact: Evidence for equivalence classification in the mid-vowels of Occitan–French bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 September 2017

Damien Mooney
Damien Mooney*
Affiliation:
University of Bristol, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article examines first to second language (L1-to-L2) phonetic transfer in the speech of ten Occitan–French bilinguals, focusing on the mid-vowels in each of their languages. Investigating transfer in a situation of long-term societal language contact aims to shed light on the emergence of regional French phonological features from contact with Occitan. Using a sociophonetic methodology, the concept of equivalence classification (Flege 1988) is investigated, that is, that L2 words will be (initially) decomposed into familiar L2 sound categories, causing L1 and L2 sounds to resemble each other phonetically. The consequences of language contact are modelled statistically using an original corpus of over 1200 vowel tokens. The findings show that equivalence classification may not lead to equated sounds coming to resemble each other phonetically, suggesting necessary revisions to the speech learning model (SLM) hypothesis, and the need to consider the influence of sociolinguistic factors in situations of long-term language contact is emphasised.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 49 , Issue 1 , April 2019 , pp. 53 - 85
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamson, H. Douglas & Regan, Vera M.. 1991. The acquisition of community speech norms by Asian immigrants learning English as a second language: A preliminary study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 13, 1–22.Google Scholar
Bahrick, Harry P., Hall, Lynda K., Goggin, Judith P., Bahrick, Lorraine E. & Berger, Stephanie A.. 1994. Fifty years of language maintenance and language dominance in bilingual Hispanic immigrants. Journal of Experimental Psychology 123, 264–283.Google Scholar
Birdsong, David (ed.). 1999. Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul. 2001. Praat: A system for doing phonetics by computer. Glot International 5, 341–345.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.22). http://www.praat.org/ (accessed July 2012).Google Scholar
Bornstein, Marc H. 1989. Sensitive periods in development: Structural characteristics and causal interpretations. Psychological Bulletin 105, 179–197.Google Scholar
Clément, Richard, Dörnyei, Zoltán & Noels, Kimberly A.. 1994. Motivation, self-confidence, and group cohesion in the foreign language classroom. Language learning 44, 417–448.Google Scholar
Cook, Vivian. 1999. Going beyond the native speaker in language teaching. TESOL quarterly 33, 185–209.Google Scholar
Dorian, Nancy C. 1981. Language death: The life cycle of a Scottish Gaelic dialect. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Dörnyei, Zoltán & Ushioda, Ema (eds.). 2009. Motivation, language identity and the L2 self. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Drummond, Rob. 2012. Aspects of identity in a second language: ING variation in the speech of Polish migrants living in Manchester, UK. Language Variation and Change 24, 107–133.Google Scholar
Dubois, Sylvie & Horvath, Barbara M.. 1998. Let's tink about dat: Interdental fricatives in Cajun English. Language Variation and Change 10, 245–261.Google Scholar
Durand, Jacques. 2009. Essai de panorama critique des accents du midi. In Baronian, Luc & Martineau, France (eds.), Le français, d'un continent à l'autre: Mélanges offerts à Yves Charles Morin, 123–170. Québec: Presses de l'Université Laval.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1988. The production and perception of speech sounds in a foreign language. In Winitz, Harris (ed.), Human communication and its disorders: A review 1988, 224–401. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1990. The intelligibility of English vowels spoken by British and Dutch talkers. In Kent, Raymond D. (ed.), Intelligibility in speech disorders: Theory, measurement, and management, 157–232. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1991. Age learning effects the authenticity of voice-onset time (VOT) in stop consonants produced in a second language. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 85, 395–411.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1995. The phonetic study of bilingualism. In Bloothooft, Gerrit, Hazan, Valerie, Huber, Dieter & Llisterri, Joaquim (eds.), European studies in phonetics and speech communication, 98–103. Utrecht: OTS Publications.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 1997. The role of category formation in second-language speech learning. In Leather, Jonathan & James, Allan (eds.), New Sounds 97: Proceedings of the Third International Symposium on the Acquisition of Second-language Speech, 79–89. Klagenfurt, Austria: University of Klagenfurt.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 2005. The origins and development of the speech learning model. Presented at the First Acoustical Society of America Workshop on L2 Speech Learning, Simon Fraser University.Google Scholar
Flege, James E. 2007. Language contact in bilingualism: Phonetic system interactions. In Cole, Jennifer & Hualde, Jose I. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9, 353–380. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., MacKay, Ian R. A. & Meador, Diane. 1999. Native Italian speakers’ production and perception of English vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 2973–2987.Google Scholar
Flege, James E., Yeni-Komshian, Grace H. & Liu, Serena. 1999. Age constraints on second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language 41, 78–104.Google Scholar
Frenck-Mestre, Cheryl, Anton, Jean Luc, Roth, Muriel, Vaid, Jyotsna & Viallet, François. 2005. Articulation in early and late bilinguals’ two languages: Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging. Neuroreport 16, 761–765.Google Scholar
Jenkins, Jennifer 1998. Which pronunciation norms and models for English as an international language? ELT Journal 52, 119–126.Google Scholar
Johnson, Daniel. E. 2008. Rbrul. http://www.ling.upenn.edu/~johnson4/Rbrul.R (accessed May 2016).Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith. 1997. Speech perception without speaker normalization: An exemplar model. In Johnson, Keith & Mullennix, John W. (eds.), Talker variability in speech processing, 145–165. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, Eric H. 1967. Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Lobanov, Boris M. 1971. Classification of Russian vowels spoken by different speakers. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 49, 606–608.Google Scholar
MacIntyre, Peter D., Baker, Susan C., Clément, Richard & Donovan, Leslie A.. 2002. Sex and age effects on willingness to communicate, anxiety, perceived competence, and L2 motivation among junior high school French immersion students. Language Learning 52, 537–564.Google Scholar
MacKay, Ian R. A., Meador, Diane & Flege, James E.. 2001. The identification of English consonants by native speakers of Italian. Phonetica 58, 103–125.Google Scholar
Martinet, André. 1955. Économie des changements phonétiques. Bern: A. Francke.Google Scholar
Mooney, Damien. 2014a. Illustrations of the IPA: Béarnais (Gascon). Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44 (3), 343–350.Google Scholar
Mooney, Damien. 2014b. Linguistic transfer and dialect levelling: A sociophonetic analysis of contact in the regional French of Béarn. D.Phil. dissertation, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Mooney, Damien. 2016. Southern regional French: A linguistic analysis of language and dialect contact. Oxford: Legenda.Google Scholar
Moreux, Bernard. 2006. Les voyelles moyennes en français du Midi: une tentative de synthèse en 1985. Cahiers de grammaire 30, 307–317.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves Charles. 2005. L'implantation du français à Marseille au XVIe siècle: les voyelles nasales et les semi-voyelles. In Arnavielle, Teddy (ed.), Langues: histoires et usages dans l'aire méditerranéenne, 225–237. Paris: L'Harmattan.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves C. 2009. Acquiring the vowel system of a cognate language: The role of substrate and spelling in the development of the French spoken in Marseilles during the sixteenth century. In Miret, Fernando Sànchez (ed.), Romanística sin complejos – Homenaje a Carmen Pensado, 409–454. Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
Newlin-Luckowicz, Luiza. 2013. TH-stopping in New York City: Substrate effect turned ethnic marker? University of Pennsylvania Working Papers in Linguistics 19, 151–160.Google Scholar
Newlin-Lukowicz, Luiza. 2014. From interference to transfer in language contact: Variation in voice onset time. Language Variation and Change 26, 359–385.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer. 2013. New contrast acquisition: Methodological issues and theoretical implications. English Language & Linguistics 17, 325–357.Google Scholar
Nycz, Jennifer & Hall-Lew, Lauren. 2013. Best practices in measuring vowel merger. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 134, 4198–4198.Google Scholar
Pallier, Christophe, Bosch, Laura & Sebastián-Gallés, Núria. 1997. A limit on behavioral plasticity in speech perception. Cognition 64, 9–17.Google Scholar
Paltridge, John & Giles, Howard. 1984. Attitudes towards speakers of regional accents of French: Effects of regionality, age and sex of listeners. Linguistische berichte 90, 71–85.Google Scholar
Pavlenko, Aneta. 2000. L2 influence on L1 in late bilingualism. Issues in Applied Linguistics 11, 175–205.Google Scholar
Penfield, Wilder & Roberts, Lamar. 1959. Speech and brain mechanisms. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet. 2001. Exemplar dynamics: Word frequency, lenition, and contrast. In Bybee, Joan L. & Hopper, Paul J. (eds.), Frequency effects and the emergence of linguistic structure, 137–157. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Ricento, Thomas. 2005. Considerations of identity in L2 learning. In Hinkel, Eli (ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning, 895–910. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Sancier, Michele L. & Fowler, Carol. A.. 1997. Gestural drift in a bilingual speaker of Brazilian Portuguese and English. Journal of Phonetics 25, 421–436.Google Scholar
Sauro, Shannon & Smith, Bryan. 2010. Investigating L2 performance in text chat. Applied Linguistics 31, 554–577.Google Scholar
Schumann, John H. 1976. Social distance as a factor in second language acquisition. Language Learning 26, 135–143.Google Scholar
Sebastián-Gallés, Núria & Soto-Faraco, Salvador. 1999. On-line processing of native and non-native phonemic contrasts in bilinguals. Cognition 72, 111–123.Google Scholar
Seliger, Herbert W. 1996. Primary language attrition in the context of bilingualism. In Ritchie, William C. & Bhatia, Tej K. (eds.), Handbook of second language acquisition, 605–625. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani. 2005. Language transfer and discourse universals in Indian English article use. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 27, 535–566.Google Scholar
Sharma, Devyani & Sankaran, Lavanya. 2011. Cognitive and social forces in dialect shift: Gradual change in London Asian speech. Language Variation and Change 23, 399–428.Google Scholar
Simonet, Miquel. 2010. Dark and clear laterals in Catalan and Spanish: Interaction of phonetic categories in early bilinguals. Journal of Phonetics 38, 664–679.Google Scholar
Simonet, Miquel. 2011. Production of a Catalan-specific vowel contrast by early Spanish–Catalan bilinguals. Phonetica 68, 88–110.Google Scholar
Watson, Ian. 2002. Convergence in the brain: The leakiness of bilinguals’ sound systems. In Jones, Mari C. & Esch, Edith (eds.), Language change: The interplay of internal, external and extra-linguistic factors, 243–266. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Wolfram, Walt, Carter, Phillip & Moriello, Beckie. 2004. Emerging Hispanic English: New dialect formation in the American South. Journal of Sociolinguistics 8, 339–358.Google Scholar