Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2plfb Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T16:06:46.499Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The phonetic implementation of underlying and epenthetic stops in word final clusters in Valencian Catalan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 March 2012

Daniel Recasens*
Affiliation:
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Institut d'Estudis Catalans, [email protected]

Abstract

Data for closure duration and the stop burst, as well as on the duration of the adjacent phonetic segments, reveal that speakers of Valencian Catalan produce differently the clusters /lts/ and /ls/, and /rts/ and /rs/, where /t/ is an underlying phoneme in /lts, rts/ and stop epenthesis may occur in /ls, rs/. Only a subset of speakers contrast the production of the nasal cluster pairs /mps/–/ms/ and /nts/–/ns/. Stop epenthesis applies regularly in the sequences /ms, ns, ls, ʎs, ɲs/ but the inserted segment is only phonetically robust in the two latter clusters with an alveolopalatal consonant and to some extent in /ns/, and practically absent in the sequence /rs/. Differences in prominence for the stop consonant, whether underlying or epenthetic, occur as a function of the segmental composition of the cluster, as well as of utterance position and syllable and word affiliation. In conjunction with results from perception tests, it is claimed that these data contribute to our understanding of oral stop deletion after a (quasi-)homorganic consonant in word final clusters without /s/ in other dialects of Catalan and perhaps other languages.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ali, Latif, Daniloff, Ray & Hammarberg, Robert. 1979. Intrusive stops in nasal–fricative clusters: An aerodynamic and acoustic investigation. Phonetica 36, 8597.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arvaniti, Amalia. 2006. Stop epenthesis revisited. Laboratory Phonology 10 (book of abstracts), 67–68. Paris.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Kilpatrick, Cynthia. 2007. The production and perception of epenthetic stops. Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America, Anaheim, CA.Google Scholar
Black, John W. 1950. The pressure component in the production of consonants. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders 15, 207210.Google Scholar
Blankenship, Barbara. 1992. What TIMIT can tell us about epenthesis. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 81, 1725.Google Scholar
Brasington, R. W. P. 1973. Reciprocal rules in Catalan phonology. Journal of Linguistics 9, 2533.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Goldstein, Louis. 1991. Gestural structures: Distinctiveness, phonological processes, and historical change. In Mattingly, Ignatius G. & Studdert-Kennedy, Michael (eds.), Modularity and the motor theory of speech perception, 313338. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Busà, Maria Grazia. 2007. Coarticulatory nasalization and phonological developments. In Solé, Maria Josep, Beddor, Patrice S. & Ohala, Manjari (eds.), Experimental approaches to phonology, 155174. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, George N. 1987. Phonological feature representations and the description of intrusive stops. In Bosch, Anna, Need, Barbara & Schiller, Eric (eds.), Parasession on Autosegmental and Metrical Phonology, 2950. Chicago: Chicago Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Côté, Marie-Hélène. 2000. Consonant cluster phonotactics: A perceptual approach. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, Eli. 1954. Acoustic analysis of stop consonants. Miscellanea Phonetica 2, 4259.Google Scholar
Fourakis, Marios & Port, Robert. 1986. Stop epenthesis in English. Journal of Phonetics 14, 197221.Google Scholar
Malécot, André. 1955. An experimental study of force of articulation. Studia Linguistica 9, 3544.Google Scholar
Mazaudon, Martine & Michaud, Alexis. 2008. Tonal contrasts and initial consonants: A case study of Tamang, a ‘missing link’ in tonogenesis. Phonetica 65, 231256.Google Scholar
Morin, Yves-Charles. 1987. De quelques propriétés de l’épenthèse consonantique. Revue Canadienne de Linguistique 32, 365375.Google Scholar
Mowrey, Richard & Pagliuca, William. 1995. The reductive character of phonetic evolution. Rivista di Linguistica 7, 37124.Google Scholar
Murray, Robert W. 1987. On epenthesis. Folia Linguistica 23, 293316.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1975. The temporal regulation of speech. In Fant, Gunnar & Tatham, Marcel A. A. (eds.), Auditory analysis and the perception of speech, 431453. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. Speech timing as a tool in phonology. Phonetica 38, 204212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (ed.), The production of speech, 189216. New York: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1985. Linguistics and automatic processing of speech. In de Mori, Renato & Suen, Ching Y. (eds.), New systems and architectures for automatic speech recognition and synthesis, 448475. Berlin & Heidelberg: Springer Verlag.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1997. Emergent stops. The 4th Seoul International Conference on Linguistics, 8491. Seoul: Linguistic Society of Korea.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Solé, Maria Josep. 2010. Turbulence and phonology. In Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Żygis, Marzena (eds.), Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide, 3797. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. Richard. 1997. Articulatory phonology as a tool for explanation in historical phonology: The case of stop epenthesis in Germanic. In Rauch, Irmengard & Carr, Gerald F. (eds.), Insights in Germanic linguistics II: Classic and contemporary, 207226. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Picard, Marc. 1987. On the general properties of consonant epenthesis. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 32, 133142.Google Scholar
Raphael, Larry J., Dorman, Michael F., Freeman, Frances & Tobin, Charles. 1975. Vowel and nasal duration as cues to voicing in word-final stop consonants: Spectrographic and perceptual studies. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18, 389400.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recasens, Daniel. 1993. Fonètica i fonologia. Barcelona: Enciclopèdia Catalana.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1996. Fonètica descriptiva del català, 2nd edn.Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2006. Integrating coarticulation, assimilation and blending into a model of articulatory constraints. In Goldstein, Louis, Whalen, Douglas H. & Best, Catherine T. (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 8, 611634. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rohlfs, Gerhard. 1968. Grammatica storica della lingua italiana e dei suoi dialetti. Turin: Einaudi.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria Josep. 2007. Compatibility of features and phonetic content: The case of nasalization. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), The 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 16), 261266. Saarbrücken: Universität des Saarlandes.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria Josep. 2009. Aerodynamic factors and phonological patterning. Journal of Phonetics 30, 655688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Veny, Joan. 1998. Els parlars catalans. Mallorca: Moll Editorial.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha & Weber, Andrea. 2001. Perception of epenthetic stops. Journal of Phonetics 29, 5388.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha & Weber, Andrea. 2002. Stop epenthesis at syllable boundaries. The 7th International Conference on Spoken Processing, 11211124. Denver, CO.Google Scholar
Wetzels, Leo. 1985. The historical phonology of intrusive stops: A non-linear description. Canadian Journal of Linguistics 30, 285333.Google Scholar
Wheeler, Max. 1979. Phonology of Catalan. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Yoo, Isaiah WonHo & Blankenship, Barbara. 2003. Duration of epenthetic [t] in polysyllabic American English words. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 33, 153165.Google Scholar