Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by
Crossref.
Mees, Inger
and
Collins, Beverley
1983.
A phonetic description of the vowel system of Standard Dutch (ABN).
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 13,
Issue. 2,
p.
64.
HOWELL, ROBERT B.
1986.
TRACING THE ORIGIN OF UVULAR R IN THE GERMANIC LANGUAGES.
Folia Linguistica Historica,
Vol. 20,
Issue. Historica vol. 7,2,
Wells, J. C.
1989.
Computer-coded Phonemic Notation of Individual Languages of the European Community.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
31.
Shibles, Warren
1996.
The comparative Phonetics of Dutch and its Dialects.
ITL - International Journal of Applied Linguistics,
Vol. 111-112,
Issue. ,
p.
119.
van de Velde, Hans
Gerritsen, Marinel
and
van Hout, Roeland
1996.
The devoicing of fricatives in Standard Dutch: A real-time study based on radio recordings.
Language Variation and Change,
Vol. 8,
Issue. 2,
p.
149.
Plug, Leendert
and
Ogden, Richard
2003.
A Parametric Approach to the Phonetics of Postvocalic /r/ in Dutch.
Phonetica,
Vol. 60,
Issue. 3,
p.
159.
Verhoeven, Jo
De Pauw, Guy
and
Kloots, Hanne
2004.
Speech Rate in a Pluricentric Language: A Comparison Between Dutch in Belgium and the Netherlands.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 3,
p.
297.
van Bezooijen, Renée
2005.
Approximant /r/ in Dutch: Routes and feelings.
Speech Communication,
Vol. 47,
Issue. 1-2,
p.
15.
Simpson, J.M.Y.
2006.
Encyclopedia of Language & Linguistics.
p.
16.
Boersma, Paul
and
Hamann, Silke
2008.
The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars.
Phonology,
Vol. 25,
Issue. 2,
p.
217.
Hanulíková, Adriana
and
Weber, Andrea
2012.
Sink positive: Linguistic experience with th substitutions influences nonnative word recognition.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
Vol. 74,
Issue. 3,
p.
613.
Brandmeyer, Alex
Desain, Peter W.M.
and
McQueen, James M.
2012.
Effects of native language on perceptual sensitivity to phonetic cues.
NeuroReport,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 11,
p.
653.
Keulen, Stefanie
Verhoeven, Jo
De Page, Louis
Jonkers, Roel
Bastiaanse, Roelien
and
Mariën, Peter
2016.
Psychogenic Foreign Accent Syndrome: A New Case.
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,
Vol. 10,
Issue. ,
Bien, Heidrun
Hanulíková, Adriana
Weber, Andrea
and
Zwitserlood, Pienie
2016.
A Neurophysiological Investigation of Non-native Phoneme Perception by Dutch and German Listeners.
Frontiers in Psychology,
Vol. 7,
Issue. ,
Smakman, Dick
2018.
Het Nederlandse fonologiegedeelte van Taalportaal.
Nederlandse Taalkunde
,
Vol. 23,
Issue. 2,
p.
117.
Coetzee, Andries W.
Beddor, Patrice Speeter
Shedden, Kerby
Styler, Will
and
Wissing, Daan
2018.
Plosive voicing in Afrikaans: Differential cue weighting and tonogenesis.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 66,
Issue. ,
p.
185.
Pinget, Anne-France
Kager, René
and
Van de Velde, Hans
2020.
Linking Variation in Perception and Production in Sound Change: Evidence from Dutch Obstruent Devoicing.
Language and Speech,
Vol. 63,
Issue. 3,
p.
660.
Wagner, Mónica A.
Broersma, Mirjam
McQueen, James M.
Dhaene, Sara
and
Lemhöfer, Kristin
2021.
Phonetic convergence to non-native speech: Acoustic and perceptual evidence.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 88,
Issue. ,
p.
101076.
Pinget, Anne-France
2022.
Individual differences in phonetic imitation and their role in sound change.
Phonetica,
Vol. 79,
Issue. 5,
p.
425.
Kendall, Tyler
Pharao, Nicolai
Stuart-Smith, Jane
and
Vaughn, Charlotte
2023.
Advancements of phonetics in the 21st century: Theoretical issues in sociophonetics.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 98,
Issue. ,
p.
101226.