Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T15:56:18.480Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Phonation and laryngeal specification in American English voiceless obstruents

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 November 2017

Lisa Davidson*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, New York [email protected]

Abstract

This study presents a detailed acoustic analysis of phonation in voiceless obstruents in American English (AE) to investigate the acoustic consequences of the laryngeal timing that has been reported in the literature. The current study examines the appearance of phonation in voiceless obstruents in a corpus of read speech with 37 AE speakers. Linguistic factors such as phrase and word position, stress, and the preceding phoneme are examined and are shown to condition the presence and degree of phonation during the constriction period of stops and fricatives. The amount of phonation present is further analyzed by characterizing where in the constriction interval phonation appears. Carryover phonation (or bleed) from a preceding sonorant is most common for stops, while a trough pattern (phonation that dies out and then begins again before the end of the closure) is more prevalent for fricatives. These acoustic patterns, together with previous reports of laryngeal articulation and air pressure measures, have implications for the representation of laryngeal timing in a gestural phonology framework.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abdelli-Beruh, Nassima. 2004. The stop voicing contrast in French sentences: Contextual sensitivity of vowel duration, closure duration, voice onset time, stop release and closure voicing. Phonetica 61, 201219.Google Scholar
Bárkányi, Zsuzsanna & Kiss, Zoltán. 2009. Hungarian v: Is it voiced? In den Dikken, Marcel & Vago, Robert (eds.), Approaches to Hungarian 11: Papers from the 2007 New York Conference, 128. New York: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steven. 2014. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using Eigen and S4. R package version 1.0-6.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2009. German fricatives: Coda devoicing or positional faithfulness? Phonology 26, 231268.Google Scholar
Beckman, Jill, Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2013. Empirical evidence for laryngeal features: Aspirating vs. true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics 49 (2), 259284.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka. 1975. Control of pharyngeal cavity size for English voiced and voiceless stops. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 57, 456461.Google Scholar
Bell-Berti, Fredericka. 1993. Understanding velic motor control: Studies of segmental context. In Huffman & Krakow (eds.), 63–85.Google Scholar
Best, Catherine T. & Hallé, Pierre A.. 2010. Perception of initial obstruent voicing is influenced by gestural organization. Journal of Phonetics 38 (1), 109126.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2016. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.23.Google Scholar
Bouavichith, Dominique & Davidson, Lisa. 2013. Segmental and prosodic effects on intervocalic voiced stop reduction in connected speech. Phonetica 70 (3), 182206.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Goldstein, Louis. 1986. Towards an articulatory phonology. Phonology Yearbook 3, 219252.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Goldstein, Louis. 1990. Tiers in articulatory phonology, with some implications for casual speech. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I: Between the grammar and physics of speech, 341376. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155180.Google Scholar
Burton, Martha & Robblee, Karen. 1997. A phonetic analysis of voicing assimilation in Russian. Journal of Phonetics 25, 97114.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong, Yoon, Yeomin & Kim, Sahyang. 2014. Effects of prosodic boundary and syllable structure on the temporal realization of CV gestures. Journal of Phonetics 44, 96109.Google Scholar
Cooper, André. 1991. An articulatory account of aspiration in English. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2016. Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 54, 3550.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa & Erker, Daniel. 2014. Hiatus resolution in American English: The case against glide insertion. Language 90 (2), 482514.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard. 1992. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: Foris.Google Scholar
Eager, Christopher. 2015. Automated voicing analysis in Praat: Statistically equivalent to manual segmentation. In The Scottish Consortium for ICPhS 2015 (ed.), Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVIII). Glasgow: University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
Flege, James. 1982. Laryngeal timing and phonation onset in utterance-initial English stops. Journal of Phonetics 10, 177192.Google Scholar
Flege, James & Brown, W. S.. 1982. Effects of utterance position on English speech timing. Journal of Phonetics 10, 335345.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne. 2005. Articulatory correlates of the voicing contrast in alveolar obstruent production in German. Ph.D. dissertation, ZAS Berlin & Queen Margaret University, Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne & Koenig, Laura. 2009. Simultaneous measures of electropalatography and intraoral pressure in selected voiceless lingual consonants and consonant sequences of German. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (4), 19882001.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian. 2011. Acoustic and articulatory features in phonology: The case for [long VOT]. The Linguistic Review 28, 281313.Google Scholar
Gelman, Andrew & Hill, Jennifer. 2006. Data analysis using regression and multilevel/hierarchical models. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis, Byrd, Dani & Saltzman, Elliot. 2006. The role of vocal tract gestural action units in understanding the evolution of phonology. In Arbib, Michael (ed.), From action to language: The mirror neuron system, 215249. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goldstein, Louis & Fowler, Carol. 2003. Articulatory phonology: A phonology for public language use. In Schiller, Niels & Meyer, Antje (eds.), Phonetics and phonology in language comprehension and production: Differences and similarities. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Gurevich, Naomi. 2011. Lenition. In van Oostendorp, Marc, Ewen, Colin, Hume, Elizabeth & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, 15591575. New York: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Haggard, Mark. 1978. The devoicing of voiced fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 6 (2), 95102.Google Scholar
Hanson, Helen. 2009. Effects of obstruent consonants on fundamental frequency at vowel onset in English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 125 (1), 425441.Google Scholar
Honeybone, Patrick. 2005. Diachronic evidence in segmental phonology: The case of obstruent laryngeal specifications. In Van Oostendorp, Marc & Van de Weijer, Jeroen (eds.), The internal organization of phonological segments, 317352. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Hoole, Philip. 1997. Laryngeal coarticulation, Section 1: Coarticulatory investigations of the devoicing gesture. Forschungsberichte des Instituts für Phonetick und Sprachliche Kommunikation der Universität München 35, 8999.Google Scholar
Huffman, Marie & Krakow, Rena (eds.). 1993. Nasals, nasalization and the velum (Phonetics and Phonology 5). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hutters, Birgit. 1985. Vocal fold adjustments in aspirated and unaspirated stops in Danish. Phonetica 42, 124.Google Scholar
Iverson, Gregory & Salmons, Joseph. 1995. Aspiration and laryngeal representation in Germanic. Phonology 12, 369396.Google Scholar
Jacewicz, Ewa, Fox, Robert Allen & Lyle, Samantha. 2009. Variation in stop consonant voicing in two regional varieties of American English. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 39 (3), 313334.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael. 1998. Phonetics and phonology of tense and lax obstruents in German. Amsterdam & Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Jessen, Michael & Ringen, Catherine. 2002. Laryngeal features in German. Phonology 19, 189218.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia. 1984. Phonetic and phonological representation of stop consonant voicing. Language 60 (2), 286319.Google Scholar
Koenig, Laura, Fuchs, Susanne & Lucero, Jorge. 2011. Effects of consonant manner and vowel height on intraoral pressure and articulatory contact at voicing offset and onset for voiceless obstruents. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 129 (5), 32333244.Google Scholar
Koenig, Laura & Lucero, Jorge. 2008. Stop-consonant voicing and intraoral pressure contours in women and children. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123 (2), 10771088.Google Scholar
Lavoie, Lisa. 2001. Consonant strength: Phonological patterns and phonetic manifestations. New York: Garland.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh. 1986. “Voicing” in English: A catalogue of acoustic features signaling /b/ versus /p/ in trochees. Language and Speech 29 (1), 311.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20 (3), 384422.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1967. Some effects of context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech 10 (1), 128.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh, Sawashima, Masayuki, Abramson, Arthur S. & Cooper, Franklin. 1970. Cineradiographic observations of the larynx during voiced and voiceless stops. Haskins Laboratories: Status Report on Speech Research 21/22, 201211.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders. 1980. Interarticulator programming in stop production. Journal of Phonetics 8, 475490.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders, Koenig, Laura & McGowan, Richard. 1995. Vocal tract aerodynamics in /aCa/utterances: Measurements. Speech Communication 16 (1), 49–66.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders & McGarr, Nancy. 1987. Laryngeal dynamics in voiceless consonant production. In Baer, Thomas, Sasaki, Clarence T. & Harris, Katherine (eds.), Laryngeal function in phonation and respiration, 391402. Boston, MA: College Hill.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders & Yoshioka, Hirohide. 1981. Interarticulator programming in obstruent production. Phonetica 38, 2134.Google Scholar
Löfqvist, Anders & Yoshioka, Hirohide. 1984. Intrasegmental timing: Laryngeal–oral coordination in voiceless consonant production. Speech Communication 3, 279289.Google Scholar
McGowan, Richard, Koenig, Laura & Löfqvist, Anders. 1995. Vocal tract aerodynamics in /aCa/utterances: Simulations. Speech Communication 16 (1), 67–88.Google Scholar
McGowan, Richard & Saltzman, Elliot. 1995. Incorporating aerodynamic and laryngeal components into task dynamics. Journal of Phonetics 23, 255269.Google Scholar
Möbius, Bernd. 2004. Corpus-based investigations on the phonetics of consonant voicing. Folia Linguistica 38 (1–2), 526.Google Scholar
Moosmüller, Sylvia & Ringen, Catherine. 2004. Voice and aspiration in Austrian German plosives. Folia Linguistica 38 (1–2), 4362.Google Scholar
Munhall, Kevin & Löfqvist, Anders. 1992. Gestural aggregation in speech: Laryngeal gestures. Journal of Phonetics 20, 111126.Google Scholar
Munhall, Kevin, Ostry, David & Parush, Avraham. 1985. Characteristics of velocity profiles of speech movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance 11, 457474.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung. 2007. Syllable-level intergestural timing model: Split-gesture dynamics focusing on positional asymmetry qand moraic structure. In Cole, Jennifer & Ignacio Hualde, José (eds.), Laboratory Phonology 9, 483506. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nam, Hosung, Goldstein, Louis, Saltzman, Elliot & Byrd, Dani. 2004. TADA: An enhanced, portable task dynamics model in MATLAB. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115 (5), 2430.Google Scholar
Narayanan, Shrikanth S., Alwan, Abeer A. & Haker, Katherine. 1995. An articulatory study of fricative consonants using magnetic resonance imaging. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 98 (3), 13251347.Google Scholar
Nicolae, Andreea & Nevins, Andrew. 2016. Fricative patterning in aspirating versus true voice languages. Journal of Linguistics 52 (1), 151174.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Katerina. 2001. An electropalatographic study of Greek spontaneous speech. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 31 (1), 6785.Google Scholar
Ohala, John & Kawasaki-Fukumori, Haruko. 1997. Alternatives to the sonority hierarchy for explaining segmental sequential constraints. In Eliasson, Stig & Hakon Jahr, Ernst (eds.), Language and its ecology, 343365. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Ohala, John & Ohala, Manjari. 1993. The phonetics of nasal phonology: Theorems and data. In Huffman & Krakow (eds.), 225–249.Google Scholar
Parrell, Benjamin. 2011. A dynamical account of how /b, d, g/ differ from /p, t, k/ in Spanish: Evidence from labials. Laboratory Phonology 2 (2), 531542.Google Scholar
Pirello, Karen, Blumstein, Sheila E. & Kurowski, Kathleen. 1997. The characteristics of voicing in syllable-initial fricatives in American English. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 101 (6), 37543765.Google Scholar
Plant, Randall, Freed, Gary & Plant, Richard. 2004. Direct measurement of onset and offset phonation threshold pressure in normal subjects. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (6), 36403646.Google Scholar
Proctor, Michael, Shadle, Christine & Iskarous, Khalil. 2010. Pharyngeal articulation in the production of voiced and voiceless fricatives. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 127 (3), 15071518.Google Scholar
Purnell, Thomas, Salmons, Joseph, Tepeli, Dilara & Mercer, Jennifer. 2005. Structured heterogeneity and change in laryngeal phonetics: Upper Midwestern final obstruents. Journal of English Linguistics 33 (4), 307338.Google Scholar
Development Core Team, R. 2013. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Redi, Laura & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2001. Variation in the realization of glottalization in normal speakers. Journal of Phonetics 29 (4), 407429.Google Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Kulikov, Vladimir. 2012. Voicing in Russian stops: Cross-linguistic implications. Journal of Slavic Linguistics 20 (2), 269286.Google Scholar
Rothenberg, Martin. 1968. The breath-stream dynamics of simple-released-plosive production. Basel: Karger.Google Scholar
Samokhina, Natalya. 2010. Phonetics and phonology of regressive voicing assimilation in Russian native and non-native speech. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Arizona.Google Scholar
Shih, Chilin, Möbius, Bernd & Narasimhan, Bhuvana. 1999. Contextual effects on consonant voicing profiles: A cross-linguistic study. Proceedings of the 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIV), San Francisco, 989–992.Google Scholar
Smith, Bruce. 1978. Effects of place of articulation and vowel environment on ‘voiced’ stop consonant production. Glossa 12, 163175.Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline. 1997. The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics 25 (4), 471500.Google Scholar
Snoeren, Natalie D., Hallé, Pierre A. & Segui, Juan. 2006. A voice for the voiceless: Production and perception of assimilated stops in French. Journal of Phonetics 34 (2), 241268.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2009. Acoustic and aerodynamic factors in the interaction of features: The case of nasality and voicing. In Vigário, Marina, Frota, Sónia & João Freitas, Maria (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Interactions and interrelations, 205–234. Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep. 2011. Articulatory adjustments in initial voiced stops in Spanish, French and English. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (XVII), Hong Kong,18781881.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth, Blumstein, Sheila, Glicksman, Laura, Burton, Martha & Kurowski, Kathleen. 1992. Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of voicing in fricatives and fricative clusters. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (5), 29793000.Google Scholar
Suomi, Kari. 1980. Voicing in English and Finnish stops, vol. 10. Turku: University of Turku.Google Scholar
Torreira, Francisco & Ernestus, Mirjam. 2011. Realization of voiceless stops and vowels in conversational French and Spanish. Laboratory Phonology 2 (2), 331353.Google Scholar
Tsuchida, Ayako, Cohn, Abigail & Kumada, Masanobu. 2000. Sonorant devoicing and the phonetic realization of [spread glottis] in English. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 13, 167181.Google Scholar
Warner, Natasha & Tucker, Benjamin. 2011. Phonetic variability of stops and flaps in spontaneous and careful speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 130 (3), 16061617.Google Scholar
Westbury, John. 1983. Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91 (4), 29032910.Google Scholar
Westbury, John & Keating, Patricia. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22, 145166.Google Scholar
Yoshioka, Hirohide, Löfqvist, Anders & Hirose, Hajime. 1981. Laryngeal adjustments in the production of consonant cluster and geminates in American English.The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 70, 16151623.Google Scholar
Yuan, Jiahong & Liberman, Mark. 2008. Speaker identification on the SCOTUS corpus. Proceedings of Acoustics '08, 56875690.Google Scholar
Zlatin, Marsha. 1979. Voicing contrast: Perceptual and productive voice onset time characteristics of adults. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 56 (3), 981994.Google Scholar