Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:38:51.794Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the articulatory classification of (alveolo)palatal consonants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

Daniel Recasens
Daniel Recasens*
Affiliation:
Departament de Filologia Catalana, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona & Laboratori de Fonètica, Institut d'Estudis Catalans, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Linguopalatal and sagittal vocal tract configuration data from a large number of languages reveal that the so-called palatal consonants (i.e. [ç ʎ c ɲ j]), as well as the vowel [i], are often realized simultaneously at the alveolar and palatal zones. Moreover, while some of these sound categories may also exhibit a palatal constriction ([ç c ɲ j i]), others are exclusively alveolar or alveolopalatal in line with the manner of articulation characteristics involved ([ʎ], also [ɕ] and [tʃ]). Consonants may favor one or more places of articulation and differ in fronting degree depending on the language taken into consideration; moreover, there appears to be a symmetry requirement by which consonants differing in manner, such as [c] and [ɲ], may agree in place. The data reported in this paper argue in favor of a revision of the articulatory classification of palatal consonants by the International Phonetic Alphabet involving their subdivision into two classes, an alveolopalatal and a palatal one.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 1 - 22
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Badin, Pierre,Perrier, Pascal, Boë, Louis-Jean & Abry, Christian. 1990. Vocalic nomograms: Acoustic and articulatory considerations upon formant convergence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87, 1290–1300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balassa, József. 1904. Magyar Fonétika. Budapest: Franklin-Társulat.Google Scholar
Barnils, Pere. 1912. Études de pronociations catalanes à l'aide du palais artificiel. Anuari de l'Oficina Romànica de Lingüística i Literatura i Literatura 6, 21–36. Barcelona: Institut d'Estudis Catalans.Google Scholar
Bolla, Kálmán. 1980. Magyar Hangalbum (Hungarian Papers in Phonetics 6). Budapest: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bolla, Kálmán. 1986. The articulatory and acoustic features of German speech sounds (Hungarian Papers in Phonetics 16). Budapest: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bolla, Kálmán. 1987. A phonetic conspectus of Polish: The articulatory and acoustic features of Polish speech sounds (Hungarian papers in phonetics 18). Budapest: Linguistics Institute of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Bruneau, Charles. 1913. Étude phonétique des patois d'Ardenne. Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Cagliari, Luiz Carlos. 1977. Airflow in palatal laterals. Work in Progress, Edinburgh University Department of Linguistics 10, 113–115.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1988. A practical introduction to phonetics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Chlumský, Joseph. 1914. La photographie des articulations dessinées au palais artificiel. Revue de Phonétique 4, 46–58.Google Scholar
Chlumský, Joseph. 1924. Les consonnes anglaises comparées aux consonnes françaises à l'aide du palais artificiel et de l'observation directe. Filosoficka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Prague: Vkomosi F. Rivnáče.Google Scholar
Clumeck, Harold. 1976. Patterns of soft palate movements in six languages. Journal of Phonetics 4, 337–351.10.1016/S0095-4470(19)31260-4CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Kochetov, Alexei. 2010. Palatal nasal or nasal palatalization? Presented at the Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages 40, University of Washington, Seattle.Google Scholar
Connell, Bruce. 1991. Phonetic aspects of the Lower Cross languages and their implications for sound change. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Connell, Bruce. 1992. Tongue contact, active articulators, and coarticulation. In Ohala, John J., Nearey, Terrance M., Derwing, Bruce L., Hodge, Megan M. & Wiebe, Grace E. (eds.), 1992 International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, 1075–1078. Edmonton: Priority Printing.Google Scholar
Daneš, František,Hála, Bohuslav, Jedlička, Alois & Romportl, Milan. 1954. O mluvem slove. Prague: Státní Pedagogické Nakladatelství.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah. 1991. Articulatory and acoustic properties of apical and laminal articulations. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 79, 1–155.Google Scholar
Dauzat, Albert. 1899. Contribution à l'étude des articulations consonantiques. La Parole 1, 611–621.Google Scholar
Dieth, Eugen. 1950. Vademekum der Phonetik. Bern: Francke.Google Scholar
Doke, Clement M. 1926. The phonetics of the Zulu language. Johannesburg: University of Witwatersrand Press.Google Scholar
Dukelski, N. I. 1960. Cercetare fonetică experimentală asupra palatalizării şi a labializării consoanelor romîneşti. Fonetică şi Fonologie 2, 7–45.Google Scholar
Dumville, Benjamin. 1912. Elements of French pronunciation and diction. London: Dent & Sons.Google Scholar
Engwall, Olov. 2000. Dynamical aspects of coarticulation in Swedish fricatives – a combined EMA & EPG study. Royal Institute of Technology KTH TMH-QPSR 41 (4), 1–25.Google Scholar
Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Farnetani, Edda,Provaglio, Andrea, Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe, Fealey, Geraldine, Recasens, Daniel, Fontdevila, Jordi & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1991. A study of the production and coarticulatory characteristics of palatal and palatalized consonants. Project ACCOR (ESPRIT II/BRA) Periodic Progress Report 2, Padova, Dublin & Barcelona.Google Scholar
Fernández, Planas, María, Ana. 2000. Estudio electropalatográfico de la coarticulación vocálica en estructuras VCV en castellano. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Barcelona.Google Scholar
Disner, Sandra F. 1983. Vowel quality: The relation between universal and language-specific factors. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 58, 1–158.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne & Koenig, Laura. 2009 Simultaneous measures of electropalatography and intraoral pressure in selected voiceless lingual consonants and consonant sequences of German. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126, 1988–2001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grammont, Maurice. 1971. Traité de phonétique. Paris: Delagrave.Google Scholar
Guzik, Karita M. & Harrington, Jonathan. 2007. The quantification of place of articulation assimilation in electropalatographic data using the similarity index (SI). Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9, 109–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haden, Ernest Faber. 1938. The physiology of French consonant changes (Supplement to Language 14).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1929. Základy spisovné výslovnosti slovenské a Srovnání s Výslovností Českou. Filosoficka fakulta Univerzity Karlovy, Prague: Vkomosi F. Rivnáče.Google Scholar
Hála, Bohuslav. 1962. Uvedení do fonetiky češtiny no obecně fonetickém základě. Prague: Nákladatelství Československě Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, W[illiam J.], Jones, W[ilf], Knight, C[olin], Trudgeon, A[nn] & Calder, G.. 1989. New developments in electropalatography: A state-of-the-art report. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 3, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, Richard T. & Carmody, Francis J.. 1937. X-ray studies of speech articulations (University of California Publications in Modern Philology 20(4)).Google Scholar
IPA [International Phonetic Association]. 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet. Cambridge: Cambrige University Press.Google Scholar
Jones, Daniel. 1960. An outline of English phonetics, 9th edn. Cambridge: Heffer & Sons.Google Scholar
Josselyn, Freeman M. 1900. Étude sur la phonétique italienne. Paris: A. Fontemoing.Google Scholar
Josselyn, Freeman M. 1907. Études de phonétique espagnole. Paris: Welter.Google Scholar
Juret, A. C. 1900. Étude phonétique et géographique sur la prononciation du patois de Pierrecourt (Haute-Saône). Paris: H. Champion.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia. 1988. Palatals as complex segments: X-ray evidence. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 69, 77–91.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia. 1991. Coronal places of articulation. In Paradis, Carole & Prunet, Jean-François (eds.), The special status of coronals: Internal and external evidence, 29–48. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia & Lahiri, Aditi. 1993. Fronted velars, palatalized velar and palatals. Phonetica 50, 73–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, Patricia,Linker, Wendy & Huffman, Marie. 1983. Patterns in allophone distribution for voiced and voiceless stops. Journal of Phonetics 11, 277–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingsley, Norman W. 1887. A treatise on oral deformities as a branch of mechanical surgery. London: H. K. Lewis.Google Scholar
Koneczna, Halina & Zawadowski, Witold. 1956. Obrazy rentgenograficzne głosek rosyjskich. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 1997. Linguistic phonetic descriptions. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of the phonetic sciences, 589–618. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter 2001. Vowels and consonants: An introduction to the sounds of languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Bladon, Anthony. 1982. Attempts by human speakers to reproduce Fant's nomograms. Speech Communication 1, 185–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lutta, Martin Corrado. 1923. Der Dialekt von Bergün und seine Stellung innerhalb der rätoromanischen Mundarten Graubündens (Supplement to Zeitschrift für Romanische Philologie 71). Halle: Niemeyer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malmberg, Bertil. 1964. La fonética. Buenos Aires: EUDEBA.Google Scholar
Martens, Peter. 1970. Optische Unterstützung akustischer Sprachsignale. In Hála, Bohuslav, Romportl, Milan & Janota, Pruemysl (eds.), The 6th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 6), 613–616. Prague: Academia Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences.Google Scholar
Martínez Celdrán, Eugenio & Planas, Ana María Fernández. 2007. Manual de fonética española. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Martins, Paula,Carbone, Inês, Pinto, Alda & Teixeira, António. 2008. European Portuguese MRI based speech production studies. Speech Communication 50, 925–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millardet, Georges. 1910. Petit atlas linguistique d'une region des Landes. Contribution à la dialectologie gasconne. Toulouse: Privat.Google Scholar
Molino, Gianpaolo & Romano, Antonio. 2004. Analisi acustica e articulatoria di alcuni contoidi palatali in un dialetto della Valsesia. Bollettino dell'Atlante Linguistico Italiano 27, 203–221.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Mitsuhiro. 2006. The spatiotemporal effects of speaking rate on gestural coordination: An EPG study. In Warren, Paul & Watson, Catherine I. (eds.), The XIth Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 301–306. Auckland: University of Auckland.Google Scholar
Nartey, Jonas. 1982. On fricative phones and phonemes. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 55, 1–181.Google Scholar
Navarro Tomás, Tomás. 1972. Manual de pronunciación española, 17th edn. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Katerina. 2003. Mia ilektropalatografiki meleti ton ouranikon simfonon tis ellinikis. In Theophanopoulou, K. D., Laskaratou, X., Sifianou, M., Georgiafentis, M. & Spyropoulos, V. (eds.), Sygxrones Taseis stin Ellininki Glossologia: Meletes Afieromenes stin Eirini Filippaki-Warburton, 108–127. Athens: Patakis.Google Scholar
Panconcelli-Calzia, Giulio. 1911. Italiano: fonetica, morfologia, testi. Leipzig: Teubner.Google Scholar
Pétursson, Magnus. 1968–1969. Les consonnes occlusives palatales [ h, g] en islandais. Travaux de l'Institut de Phonétique de Strasbourg 1, 1–13.Google Scholar
Pétursson, Magnus. 1974. Les articulations de l'islandais à la lumière de la radiocinématographie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Polland, Bohumir & Hála, Bohuslav. 1926. Artikulace Českých Zvuku v Roentgenových Obrazech (Skiagramech). Prague: Nákladatelství Československě Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Praloran, Adriana. 1943. Palatogrammi bellunesi. Ricerche di fonetica sperimentale. Masters thesis, University of Padua.Google Scholar
Puppel, Stanisław,Nawrocka-Fisiak, Jadwiga & Krassowska, Halina. 1977. A handbook of Polish pronunciation for English learners. Warsaw: Państwowe Wydawnictwo Naukowe.Google Scholar
Quilis, Antonio & Fernández, Joseph A.. 1972. Curso de fonética y fonología españolas para estudiantes angloamericanos, 6th edn. Madrid: CSIC.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1990. The articulatory characteristics of palatal consonants. Journal of Phonetics 18, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1991. An electropalatographic and acoustic study of consonant-to-vowel coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics, 19, 267–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 2011. Linguistic phonetics: A look into the future. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), The 17th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS 17), 44–51. Hong Kong: University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2005. The role of contextual and prosodic factors on consonantal lenition and elision: The case of intervocalic /j/ in Majorcan Catalan. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 4, 7–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2006. Articulatory, positional and contextual characteristics of palatal consonants: Evidence from Majorcan Catalan. Journal of Phonetics 34, 295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2007. An electropalatographic and acoustic study of affricates and fricatives in two Catalan dialects. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 143–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Espinosa, Aina. 2009. Acoustics and perception of velar softening for unaspirated stops. Journal of Phonetics 37, 189–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel,Farnetani, Edda, Fontdevila, Jordi & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1993. An electropalatographic study of alveolar and palatal consonants in Catalan and Italian. Language and Speech 36, 341–362.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recasens, Daniel,Fontdevila, Jordi & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1995. A production and perceptual account of palatalization. In Connell, Bruce & Arvaniti, Amalia (eds.), Phonology and phonetic evidence: Papers in laboratory phonology IV, 265–281. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 2001. De la fonètica a la fonologia. Les consonants i assimilacions consonàntiques del català. Barcelona: Ariel.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquín. 1997. An EMMA study of segmental complexity in alveolopalatal and palatalized alveolars. Phonetica 54, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rochette, Claude E. 1973. Les groupes de consonnes en français. Étude de l'enchaînement articulatoire à l'aide de la radiocinématographie et de l'oscillographie. II. Documents. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Romano, Antonio & Badin, Pierre. 2009. An MRI sudy of the articulatory properties of Italian consonants. Estudios de Fonética Experimental 28, 327–344.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1891. Les modifications phonétiques du langage étudiées dans le patois d'une famille de Cellefrouin (Charente). Paris: Welter.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1899a. Les articulations irlandaises étudiées à l'aide du palais artificiel. La Parole 1, 241–262.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1899b. Les articulations parisiennes étudiées à l'aide du palais artificiel. La Parole 1, 481–549.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1912. Dictionnaire de la prononciation française. Revue de Phonétique 2, 260–285.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1913. Phonétique malgache (suite), II: Dialecte betsiléo. Revue de Phonétique 3, 119–151.Google Scholar
Rousselot, Jean-Pierre. 1924–1925. Principes de phonétique expérimentale. Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Scripture, Edward Wheeler. 1902. The elements of experimental phonetics. New York: Charles Scribner's Sons.Google Scholar
Simon, Péla. 1967. Les consonnes françaises. Mouvements et positions articulatoires à la lumière de la radiocinématographie. Paris: Klincksieck.Google Scholar
Skaličková, Alena. 1974. Srovnávací Fonetika Angličtiny a Češtiny. Prague: Československě Akademie Věd.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges. 1964. À propos de la question des semi-voyelles. Zeitschrift für Phonetik, Sprachwissenschaft und Kommunikationforschung 17, 301–323.Google Scholar
Straka, Georges. 1965. Naissance et disparition des consonnes palatales dans l'évolution du latin au français. Travaux de Linguistique et de Littérature, Centre de Philologie et de Littératures Romanes de l'Université de Strasbourg 3, 117–167.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Joanne D.,Worth, Joseph H. & Sakuda, Mamoru. 1966. Intraoral pressure and rate of flow during speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 9, 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija,Fletcher, Janet & Butcher, Andrew. 2011. An EPG study of palatal consonants in two Australian languages. Language and Speech 54, 265–282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1963. Elementi di fonetica generale. Bologna: Patron.Google Scholar
Tagliavini, Carlo. 1965. La corretta pronuncia italiana. Corso discografico di fonetica e ortoepia. Bologna: Capitol-C.E.B.Google Scholar
Trudgill, Peter. 2003. Modern Greek dialects: A preliminary classification. Journal of Greek Linguistics 4, 45–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1971. Wymowa polska. Warsawa: Państwowe Zakłady Wysawnictw Szkolnych.Google Scholar
Wierzchowska, Bożena. 1980. Fonetyka i fonologia języka polskiego. Wrocław: Zakład Narodowy im. Ossolińskich, Wydawnictwo Polskiej Akademii Nauk.Google Scholar
Wood, Sidney. 1979. A radiographic analysis of constriction location for vowels. Journal of Phonetics 7, 25–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zee, Eric & Lee, Wai-Sum. 2008. The articulatory characteristics of the palatals, palatalized velars and velars in Hakka Chinese. In Sock, Rudolph, Fuchs, Susanne & Laprie, Yves (eds.), The 8th International Seminar on Speech Production, 113–116. Strasbourg: Université Marc Bloch.Google Scholar
Zeng, Ting. 2008. On the articulatory and acoustic characteristics of syllable-initial sibilants in Xiangxiang Chinese. Chinese Journal of Phonetics 2.Google Scholar
Żygis, Marzena. 2006. Contrast optimisation in Slavic sibilant systems. Habilitationsschrift, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin.Google Scholar