Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:00:31.424Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On introducing parametric phonetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Paul Tench
Paul Tench
Affiliation:
(Department of English, UWIST, Cardiff)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The term parametric is a convenient term to use to refer to a view of the study of speech sounds in which the continuous activity of the organs of speech in the production of a stretch of speech is highlighted. Parametric phonetics offers an alternative view to the more familiar segmental or postural view, in which the state of the organs of speech for a particular single segment at a particular instance is investigated. The difference between the two approaches may also be referred to as dynamic and static, respectively; the dynamic parametric view draws attention to the movement of the organs of speech, whereas the static segmental or postural view draws attention to the position or posture of the organs of speech at a given moment. In my view, the two approaches do not contradict each other; they complement each other, both being theoretically acceptable. In this paper I am concerned with introducing the parametric approach into conventional phonetics courses at first degree and postgraduate level.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 8 , Issue 1-2 , June 1978 , pp. 34 - 46
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1965). Parameters and Phonemes. In Studies in Phonetics and Linguistics. London: O.U.P.Google Scholar
Brosnahan, L. F., and Malmberg, B. (1970). Introduction to Phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Forchhammer, J. (1942). Die Sprachlaute in Wort und Bild. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Forchhammer, J. (1951). Allgemeine Sprechkunde. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Keller, K. C. (1971). Instrumental articulatory phonetics. Norman, U.S.A.: Summer Institute of Linguistics.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1975). A course in phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1970). The Production of Speech. In Lyons, J. (ed.): New Horizons in Linguistics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Menzerath, P., and Lacerda, A. De (1933). Koartikulation, Steuerung und Lautabgreuzung. Berlin and Bonn.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. (1973). Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor, U.S.A.: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics. Ann Arbor, U.S.A.: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Schafer, R. W., and Rabiner, L. R. (1975). Parametric representations of speech. In Raj Reddy, D. (ed.): Speech recognition. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar