Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T13:45:27.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

How to pronounce a low tone: A lesson from Kaifeng Mandarin

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 December 2018

Lei Wang ,
Carlos Gussenhoven  and
Jie Liang
Lei Wang
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Tongji University & Centre for Language Studies, Radboud Universiteit [email protected]
Carlos Gussenhoven
Affiliation:
Centre for Language Studies, Radboud Universiteit [email protected]
Jie Liang
Affiliation:
School of Foreign Languages, Tongji [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A multi-speaker acoustic study on citation tones in Kaifeng Mandarin, referred to as LH, HL, H and L, shows that L is realized as three different subtypes by different speakers, i.e. dipping, falling and falling with lengthening, while generally being longer than the other three tones and frequently spoken with creaky voice in part of the vowel. This inter-speaker variation is reflected in the different transcriptions of Kaifeng L that have been given in the literature. We argue that a L-tone is intrinsically less salient than a H-tone, due to a lack of phonetic space in the low pitch range as well as to a potential ambiguity between contextual low pitch around f0 peaks and low pitch due to L-tones, and thus more likely to be enhanced.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 50 , Issue 2 , August 2020 , pp. 199 - 219
Check for updates
Copyright
© International Phonetic Association 2018

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Arvaniti, Amalia. 2016. Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: Lessons from Romani. Laboratory Phonology: Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 7 (1), 1–43.Google Scholar
Belotel-Grenié, Agnès & Grenié, Michel. 2004. The creaky voice phonation and the organization of Chinese discourse. International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: With Emphasis on Tone Languages–2004, Bejing, 5–8.Google Scholar
Blicher, Deborah L., Diehl, Randy L. & Cohen, Leslie B.. 1990. Effects of syllable duration on the perception of the Mandarin Tone 2/Tone 3 distinction: Evidence of auditory enhancement. Journal of Phonetics 18, 37–49.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 1992–2015. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.4.08, retrieved from http://www.praat.org/ (24 March 2015).Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta. 1977. Swedish word accents in sentence perspective. Lund: Gleerup.Google Scholar
Cao, Wen. 2010a. Shengdiao ganzhi duibi yanjiu: Guanyu pingdiao de baogao [A compariative study on tone perception: Report on level pitch contours]. Shijie hanyu jiaoxue [Chinese teaching in the world] 24 (2), 255–262.Google Scholar
Cao, Wen. 2010b. Hanyu pingdiao de shengdiao ganzhi yanjiu [Level tone perception in Mandarin]. Zhongguo yuwen [Chinese Linguistics] 339, 536–543.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1922. Methods of experimental study of tone in Chinese speech. Kexue [Science] 7 (9), 871–882.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1968. A grammar of spoken Chinese. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Matthew Y. 2000. Tone sandhi: Patterns across Chinese dialects. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Yiya. 2012. Tonal variation. In Cohn, Abigail C., Fougeron, Cécile & Huffman, Marie K. (ed.), The Oxford handbook of laboratory phonology, 103–114. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Connell, Bruce & Ladd, D. Robert. 1990. Aspects of pitch realization in Yoruba. Phonology 7 (1), 1–29.Google Scholar
Ding, Hongwei, Jokisch, Oliver & Hoffmann, Rüdiger. 2010. Perception and production of Mandarin tones by German speakers. Speech Prosody 2010, 100153:1–4. http://speechprosody2010.illinois.edu/papers/100153.pdf (27 October 2016).Google Scholar
Duanmu, San. 2007. The phonology of Standard Chinese, 2nd edn.Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Evans, Jonathan, Yeh, Wen-Chi & Kulkarni, Rukmini. 2018. Acoustics of tone in Indian Punjabi. Transactions of the Philological Society 116 (3), 509–528.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Ponglorpisit, Suvit, Dechongkit, Sumalee, Khunadorn, Fuangfa, Boongird, Prasert & Potisuk, Siripong. 1993. Anticipatory tonal coarticulation in Thai noun compounds after unilateral brain damage. Brain and Language 45, 1–20.Google Scholar
Gandour, Jack, Potisuk, Siripong & Dechongkit, Sumalee. 1994. Tonal coarticulation in Thai. Journal of Phonetics 22 (4), 447–492.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, John A. 1976. Autosegmental Phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT. [Distributed by IULC, 1976, Published by Garland Press, New York, 1979.]Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2007. Intonation. In de Lacy, Paul (ed.), The Cambridge handbook of phonology, 253–280. London: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Rietveld, Toni. 2000. The behavior of H* and L* under variations in pitch range in Dutch rising contours. Language and Speech 43 (2), 183–203.Google Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos & Zhou, Wencui. 2013. Revisiting pitch slope and height effects on perceived duration. Proceedings of the 14th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association, Lyon, France, 1365–1369.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Judith. 2017. Regional variation in the realization of intonation contours in the Netherlands. Ph.D. dissertation, Radboud University. [Utrecht: LOT]Google Scholar
Huckvale, Mark. 2014. Prorec: A program for field workers [computer program]. Version 1.45, http://www.phon.ucl.ac.uk/resource/ (17 October 2014).Google Scholar
Hyman, Larry M. & Schuh, Russell G.. 1974. Universals of tone rules: Evidence from West Africa. Linguistic Inquiry 5 (1), 81–115.Google Scholar
Jiang, Ping. 1999. Hanyu zhufangyan shengdiao fenbu de youxuan fenxi [Tonal distribution in Chinese dialects: An OT account]. , InChen, En Quan (ed.), Shuangyu shuangfangyan yu xiandai zhongguo [Bilingualism, diglossia and modern China], 134–152. Beijing: Beijing University of Languages and Culture.Google Scholar
Jongman, Allard, Wang, Yue, Moore, Corinne B. & Sereno, Joan A.. 2006. Perception and production of Mandarin Chinese tones. In Li, Ping, Tan, Li Hai, Bates, Elizabeth & Tzeng, Ovid J. L. (eds.), The handbook of East Asian psycholinguistics, vol. 1: Chinese, 209–217. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert & Schepman, Astrid. 2003. “Sagging transitions” between high pitch accents in English: Experimental evidence. Journal of Phonetics 31 (1), 81–112.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter. 2003. Phonetic data analysis: An introduction to fieldwork and instrumental techniques. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laniran, Yetunde O. & Clements, George N.. 1995. A long-distance dependency in Yoruba tone realization. Proceedings of 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIII), Stockholm, Sweden, vol. 2, 734–737.Google Scholar
Leben, Wiliam R. 1976. The tones of English intonation. Linguistic Analysis 2, 67–107.Google Scholar
Lee, Albert, Prom-on, Santitham & Xu, Yi. 2017. Pre-low raising in Japanese pitch accent. Phonetica 74 (4), 231–246.Google Scholar
Lee, Yong-Cheol, Wang, Ting & Liberman, Mark. 2016. Production and perception of Tone 3 focus in Mandarin Chinese. Frontiers in Psychology 7 (1058), 1–13. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01058.Google Scholar
Lee-Kim, Sang-Im. 2014. Revisiting Mandarin ‘apical vowels’: An articulatory and acoustic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 44 (3), 261–282.Google Scholar
Liang, Jie & van Heuven, Vincent J.. 2004. Evidence for separate tonal and segmental tiers in the lexical specification of words: A case study of a brain-damaged Chinese speaker. Brain and Language 91 (3), 282–293.Google Scholar
Liu, Dongbing. 1997. Kaifeng fangyan jilue [A description of Kaifeng dialect]. Fangyan [Dialect] 4, 271–285.Google Scholar
Lu, Jilun. 2001. Gao, dipingdiao de buduichenxing he youxuanlun de zhiyuetiaojian [The asymmetry in H/L and OT constraints]. Proceedings of the 5th National Conference on Modern Phonetics, Beijing, China, 243–245.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. & Ewan, William G.. 1973. Speed of pitch change. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53, 345(A).Google Scholar
Peng, Gang. 2006. Temporal and tonal aspects of Chinese syllables: A corpus-based comparative study of Mandarin and Cantonese. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 34 (1), 134–154.Google Scholar
Peters, Jörg. 2007. Bitonal lexical pitch accents in the Limburgian dialect of Borgloon. In Riad, Tomas & Gussenhoven, Carlos (eds.), Tones and tunes, vol. 1: Typological studies in word and sentence prosody, 167–198. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Potisuk, Siripong, Gandour, Jack & Harper, Mary P.. 1997. Contextual variations in trisyllabic sequences of Thai tones. Phonetica 54, 22–42.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar. 1998. The scaling of the L values in Spanish downstepping contours. Journal of Phonetics 26, 261–282.Google Scholar
Prom-on, Santitham, Liu, Fang & Xu, Yi. 2012. Post-low bouncing in Mandarin Chinese: Acoustic analysis and computational modeling. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 132 (1), 421–432.Google Scholar
Riad, Tomas. 1998. Towards a Scandinavian accent typology. In Kehrein, Wolfgang & Wiese, Richard (eds.), Phonology and morphology of the Germanic languages, 77–109. Tübingen: Niemeyer.Google Scholar
Rose, Phil. 1987. Considerations in the normalization of the fundamental frequency of linguistic tone. Speech Communication 6, 343–352.Google Scholar
Shih, Chi-lin. 1988. Tone and intonation in Mandarin. Working Papers of the Cornell Phonetics Laboratory 3, 83–109.Google Scholar
van de Weijer, Jeroen & Sloos, Marjoleine. 2014. The four tones of Mandarin Chinese: Representation and acquisition. Linguistics in the Netherlands 31 (1), 180–191.Google Scholar
Vigário, Marina & Frota, Sónia. 2003. The intonation of Standard and Northern European Portuguese: A comparative and intonational phonology approach. Journal of Portuguese Linguistics 2, 115–137.Google Scholar
Wang, Lei. 2018. L-tone focus and word-internal PFC in Kaifeng Mandarin. Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Speech Prosody, 2018, Poznań, Poland, 423–427.Google Scholar
Wang, Lei & Liang, Jie. 2015. An acoustic study of tones in Kaifeng: Citation forms and contextual variations. Proceedings of the 18th Oriental COCOSDA and Conference on Asian Spoken Language Research and Evaluation, Shanghai, China, 316–320.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H. & Xu, Yi. 1992. Information for Mandarin tones in the amplitude contour and in brief segments. Phonetica 49, 25–47.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 1997. Contextual tonal variations in Mandarin. Journal of Phonetics 25 (1), 61–83.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 1999. Effects of tone and focus on the formation and alignment of f0 contours. Journal of Phonetics 27 (1), 55–105.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi. 2013. ProsodyPro: A tool for large-scale systematic prosody analysis. Proceedings of Tools and Resources for the Analysis of Speech Prosody (TRASP 2013), Aix-en-Provence, France, 7–10.Google Scholar
Xu, Yi & Sun, Xuejing. 2002. The maximum speed of pitch change and how it may relate to speech. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 111 (3), 1399–1413.Google Scholar
Yang, Ruoxiao. 2015. The role of phonation cues in Mandarin tonal perception. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 43 (1), 453–472.Google Scholar
Yu, Kristine M. & Lam, Hiu W.. 2014. The role of creaky voice in Cantonese tonal perception. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 136 (3), 1320–1333.Google Scholar
Zhang, Qihuan, Chen, Tianfu & Cheng, Yi. 1993. Henan fangyan yanjiu [A study on Henan dialects]. Kaifeng: Henan University Press.Google Scholar