Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T05:57:04.830Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The future of phonetics

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 May 2009

Klaus J. Kohler
Klaus J. Kohler
Affiliation:
Institut für Phonetik und digitale Sprachverarbeitung (IPDS)University of Kiel, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

This paper sets out from a global definition of phonetics as ‘the study of the spoken medium of language’ in the broadest sense, whose goal is the description, modelling and explanation of speech communication in the languages of the world. Within this overall scientific frame, three general perspectives are distinguished — ‘speech signal analysis’, ‘historical linguistics and sound change’, ‘phonetics of the languages of the world’ — under which a wide array of specific questions, including applications, e.g. in language teaching, speech therapy and speech technology, may be subsumed. The three perspectives are outlined individually and in relation to each other, also with regard to their separate historical developments in the study of language and speech. The modem integration of the three perspectives into the unified paradigm of ‘phonetic or experimental phonology’ is then illustrated with reference to recent research at some leading phonetics labs around the world. From this examination of past history and present-day state-of-the-art of what is considered to be the core paradigm for phonetic study, conclusions are drawn for future research and teaching on the basis of this paradigm. In the shaping of phonetics as a scientific discipline, a strong plea is put forward for scientific, explanatory integration rather than modular, taxonomic diversification of the subject.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 30 , Issue 1-2 , December 2000 , pp. 1 - 24
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Browman, C.P. and Goldstein, L. (1992) Articulatory phonology: an overview. Phonetica 49, 155–180.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Butcher, A. (1977) Coarticulation in intervocalic voiceless plosives and fricatives in connected speech. AIPUK 8, 154–213.Google Scholar
Chiba, T., Kajiyama, M. (1941) The Vowel, its Nature and Structure. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Fant, G. (1960) Acoustic Theory of Speech Production. s'Gravenhage: Mouton.Google Scholar
Firth, J.R. (1948) Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society, 127–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1987) A phonetic study of the stød in Standard Danish. ARIPUC 21, 56–265, (also as a monograph University of Turku Phonetics (1989)).Google Scholar
Heepe, M. (1928) Lautzeichen und ihre Anwendung in verschiedenen Sprachgebieten. Berlin: Reichsdruckerei.Google Scholar
Helgason, P. (1996) Lenition in German and Icelandic. AIPUK 31, 219–226.Google Scholar
Helgason, P., Kohler, K. J. (1996) Vowel deletion in the Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech. AIPUK 30, 115–157.Google Scholar
Helmholtz, H. (1862) Lehre von den Tonempfindungen als physiologische Grundlage für die Theorie der Musik. Braunschweig.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (1949) The Principles of the International Phonetic Association. London.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (1999) Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
IPDS: CD-ROM#1 (1994) The Kiel Corpus of Read Speech, vol. I. Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar
IPDS: CD-R0M#2 (1995) The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech, vol. I. Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar
IPDS: CD-ROM#3 (1996) The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech, vol. II. Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar
IPDS: CD-R0M#4 (1997a) The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech, vol. III. Kiel: IPDS.Google Scholar
IPDS: xassp(Advanced Speech Signal Processor under the X Window System) – User's Manual. (1997b) Version 1.2.15. AIPUK 32, 31–115.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1889) The articulations of speech sounds represented by means of analphabetic symbols. Marburg.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1897–1899) Fonetik, en systematisk fremstilling af leer en om sproglyd. København.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1904, 2nd ed. 1913) Lehrbuch der Phonetik. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Jespersen, O. (1904) Grundfragen der Phonetik. Leipzig: B.G. Teubner.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1997) English Pronouncing Dictionary. 15th ed. (Roach, P., Hartman, J., eds.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Kempelen, W. Von (1791) Mechanismus der menschlichen Sprache nebst der Beschreibung seiner sprechenden Maschine. Wien.Google Scholar
Klinghardt, H. (1897) Artikulations- und Hörubungen. Praktisches Hülfsbuch der Phonetik für Studierende und Lehrer. Cöthen: Otto Schulze.Google Scholar
Klinghardt, H. (1898) Der Werth der Phonetik für den Unterricht in der Muttersprache und den Fremdsprachen. Englische Studien 24, 239–264; 25, 162–194.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1979) Kommunikative Aspekte satzphonetischer Prozesse im Deutschen. In Vater, H. (editor), Phonologische Probleme des Deutschen, 13–39. Tübingen: G. Narr.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1990) Segmental reduction in connected speech in German: phonological facts and phonetic explanations. In Hardcastle, W.J., Marchal, A. (editors) Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 69–92. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1994a) Glottal stops and glottalization in German. Data and theory of connected speech processes. Phonetica 51, 38–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1994b) Complementary phonology: a theoretical frame for labelling an acoustic data base of dialogues. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 1, 427–430, Yokohama.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1995a) Articulatory reduction in different speaking styles. Proceedings of the Xlllth ICPhS. 2, 12–19, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1995b) The realization of plosives in nasal/lateral environments in spontaneous speech in German. Proceedings of the Xlllth ICPhS. 2, 210–213, Stockholm.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1995c) Phonetics and Speech Communication: Past Development and Future Perspectives. In Bloothooft, G., Hazan, V., Huber, D., Llisterri, J. (editors), European Studies in Phonetics and Speech Communication, 18–22. Utrecht: OTS PublicationsGoogle Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996a) Phonetic realization of German /Ə/-syllables. AIPUK 30, 159–194.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996b) Phonetic realization of /Ə/-syllables in German. AIPUK 31, 11–14.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996c) Articulatory reduction in German spontaneous speech. Proceedings of the 1st ESCA Tutorial and Research Workshop on Speech Production Modeling: from control strategies to acoustics, 1–4, Autrans.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996d) Glottal stop and glottalization – A prosody in European languages. AIPUK 30, 207–216.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996e) Glottalization across languages. AIPUK 31, 207–210.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996f) Developing a research paradigm for sound patterns of connected speech in the languages of the world. AIPUK 31, 227–233.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1996g) Labelled data bank of spoken standard German – The Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech. Proceedings of the International Conference on Spoken Language Processing. 3, 1938–1941, Philadelphia.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1999a) Articulatory prosodies in German reduced speech. Proceedings of the XTVth ICPhS., 1, 89–92, San Francisco.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. (1999b) Plosive-related glottalization phenomena in read and spontaneous speech. A stød in German? AIPUK 34, 285–325.Google Scholar
Kohler, K., Patzold, M., Simpson, A. P. (1995) From scenario to segment – The controlled elicitation, transcription, segmentation and labelling of spontaneous speech. AIPUK 29.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. J. and Rehor, C. (1996) Glottalization across word and syllable boundaries. AIPUK 30, 195–206.Google Scholar
Kratzenstein, C. T. (1782) Sur la naissance de la formation des voyelles. Journal de Physique 21, 358–380.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1988) A view of phonetics. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 70, 41.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1990) Some reflections on the IPA. Journal of Phonetics 18, 335–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1990) Explaining phonetic variation: a sketch of the H &H theory. In Hardcastle, W.J. and Marchal, A. (editors), Speech Production and Speech Modelling, 403–439. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1995) A view of the future of phonetics. In Bloothooft, G., Hazan, V., Huber, D., Llisterri, J. (editors), European Studies in Phonetics and Speech Communication, 22–30. Utrecht: OTS Publications.Google Scholar
Merkel, C. L. (1866) Physiologie der menschlichen Sprache. Leipzig.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. and Jaeger, J. J. (1986) Experimental Phonology. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1995a) The phonetics of phonology. In Bloothooft, G., Hazan, V., Huber, D., Llisteri, J. (editors), European Studies in Phonetics and Speech Communication, 85–89. Utrecht: OTS Publications.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1995b) The phonetics of sound change. In Jones, C. (editor), Historical Linguistics: Problems and Perspectives, 237–278. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pätzold, M. (1997) KielDat – Data bank utilities for the Kiel Corpus. AIPUK 32, 117–126.Google Scholar
Rask, R. (1818) Undersøgelse om det gamle Nordiske eller Islandske Sprogs Oprindelse. København.Google Scholar
Rehor, C. (1996) Phonetische Realisierung von Funktionswörtern im Deutschen. AIPUK 30, 1–113.Google Scholar
Rehor, C. and Patzold, M. (1996) The phonetic realization of function words in German spontaneous speech. AIPUK 31, 5–10.Google Scholar
Reyher, S. (1670) Dissertatio de Aere. Kiel.Google Scholar
Reyher, S. (1679) Mathesis Mosaica, sive Loca Pentateuchi Mathematica Mathematice Explicata.Google Scholar
Rischel, J. (1974) Topics in West Greenlandic Phonology. København: Akademisk forlag. Kiel.Google Scholar
Rischel, J. (1986) Devoicing or strengthening of long obstruents in Greenlandic. ARIPUC 20, 67–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodgers, J. (1996) Vowel deletion/devoicing. AIPUK 31, 211–218.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. (1997a) Vowel devoicing/deletion in English and German. AIPUK 32, 177–195.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J. (1997b) A comparison of vowel devoicing/deletion phenomena in English laboratory speech and German spontaneous speech. AIPUK 32, 197–214.Google Scholar
Rodgers, J., Helgason, P., Kohler, K. J. (1997) Segment deletion in the Kiel Corpus of Spontaneous Speech. AIPUK 32, 127–176.Google Scholar
Rousselot, L'abbé. (1892) Les modifications phonetiques du langage, étudiées dans le patois d'unefamille de Cellefrouin (Charente). Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Rousselot, L'abbé. (1897–1901) Principes de phonétique expérimental 2 volumes Paris: H. Welter.Google Scholar
Sievers, E. (1881) Grundzüge der Lautphysiologie. Leipzig: Breitkopf & Härtel (1876), 2nd edition Grundzuge der Phonetik zur Einfiihrung in das Studium der Lautlehre der indogermanischen Sprachen. (3rd edition 1889), (4th edition 1893), (5th edition 1901).Google Scholar
Simpson, A. P. and Patzold, M. (editors) (1996) Sound Patterns of Connected Speech – Description, Models and Explanation. AIPUK 31.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939.) Grundzüge der Phonologie. Göttingen: Vandenhoeck & Ruprecht (3rd edition 1966).Google Scholar
Verner, K. (1875) Eine Ausnahme der ersten Lautverschiebung. (Kuhns) Zs. f. vgl. Sprachforsch. 23, 97–130.Google Scholar
Zwirner, E. (1936) Grundfragen der Phonometrie. Basel: Karger (2nd edition 1966).Google Scholar