Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T17:06:52.368Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of Place of Articulation and Vowel Context on VOT Production and Perception for French and English Stops

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Terrance M. Nearey  and
Bernard L. Rochet
Terrance M. Nearey*
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics
Bernard L. Rochet
Affiliation:
Department of Romance Languages, University of Alberta, Edmonton, CanadaT6G 2E7
*
* Address for correspondence: T. M. Nearey, Department of Linguistics, 4-32 Assiniboia Hall, University of Alberta, Edmonton AB CANADA T6G 2E7. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The focus of this study is the nature of the secondary effects of place of articulation and vowel quality on VOT (and other acoustic properties) in the production of stops in French and English and the consequences of these factors on the perception of VOT continua by speakers of those languages. Although the largest source of differences in VOT is that associated with the voicing contrast, a number of previous studies indicate that both French and English stops show an effect of place of articulation, with velars showing longer VOT than labials or coronals in accord with the general tendencies noted by Lisker and Abramson (1967; see also Volaitis and Miller 1992). However, some modulation of VOT by vowel context has also been reported. Thus, Fischer-Jørgensen (1972) finds that, in French voiceless stops, VOT is longer before a high vowel than before a low vowel. She further reports an interaction between the place of articulation of the consonant and the identity of the vowel. Specifically, for /p/, the longest voicing lags occur before high rounded vowels (/u/ and /y/); but for /t/ and /k/, they are longest before /i/. Yeni-Komshian, Caramazza and Preston (1977: 43) also report longer voicing lags before /i/ than before /a/ or /o/ for unilingual French speakers.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 24 , Issue 1 , June 1994 , pp. 1 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Blumstein, S. and Stevens, K. (1980). Perceptual invariance and onset spectra for stop consonants in different vowel environments. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, 648–662.Google Scholar
Bock, R. D. (1975). Multivariate Statistical Methods in Behavioral Research. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Diehl, R. L. and Kluender, K. R. (1989). On the objects of speech perception. Ecological Psychology 1, 121–144.Google Scholar
Fischer-Jørgensen, E. (1972). ‘p t k’ et ‘b d g’ français en position intervocalique accentuée. In Valdman, A. (editor), Papers in Linguistics and Phonetics to the Memory of Pierre Delattre, 143–200. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fowler, C. A. (1986). An event approach to the study of speech perception from a direct-realist perspective. Journal of Phonetics 14, 3–28.Google Scholar
Jamieson, D. G., Nearey, T. M. and Ramji, K. (1989). CSRE: a speech research environment. Canadian Acoustics 17, 23–25.Google Scholar
Kingston, J. (1992). The phonetics and phonology of perceptually motivated articulatory covariation. Language and Speech 35(1,2), 99–113.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. (1975). Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18, 686–706.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. (1980). Software for a cascade/parallel formant synthesizer. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 67, 971–995.Google Scholar
Lahiri, A., Gewirth, L. and Blumstein, S. (1984). A reconsideration of acoustic invariance for place of articulation in diffuse stop consonants: Evidence from a cross-language study. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 76, 391–404.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. (1978). In qualified defense of VOT. Language and Speech 21, 375–383.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. S. (1964). A cross language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20: 384–422.Google Scholar
Lisker, L. and Abramson, A. (1967). Some effects on context on voice onset time in English stops. Language and Speech 19, 1–28.Google Scholar
Liberman, A. M. and Mattingly, I. G. (1985). The motor theory of speech perception revised. Cognition 21, 1–36.Google Scholar
Lorch, R. F. and Meyers, J. L. (1990). Regression analyses of repeated measures data in cognitive research. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 16, 149–157.Google Scholar
Munro, M. J. (1987) Voicing contrast in French and English labial stops. M.Sc. thesis, University of Alberta.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1990). The segment as a unit of speech perception. Journal of Phonetics 18, 347–373.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. (1992). Context effects in a double-weak theory of speech perception. Language and Speech 35, 153–172.Google Scholar
Nearey, T. M. and Rochet, B. L. (1992). Effects of place of articulation and vocalic context on the perception of VOT continua in French and English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 2471–2472 (abstract).Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1981). Articulatory constraints on the cognitive representation of speech. In Myers, T., Laver, J., and Anderson, J. (editors), The Cognitive Representation of Speech, 111–122. Amsterdam: North Holland.Google Scholar
Ohala, J. (1983). The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, P. F. (editor), The Production of Speech, 189–216. New York: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Port, R. F. and Rotunno, R. (1979). Relation between voice-onset time and vowel duration. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66, 654–662.Google Scholar
Rochet, B. L. (1991). Perception of the high vowel continuum.: A cross-language study. In Proceedings of the 12th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 4, 94–97. Aixen-Provence: Publications de l'Université de Provence.Google Scholar
Rochet, B., Nearey, T. and Munro, M. (1987). Effects of voicing, place and vowel context on VOT for French and English stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 81 Supplement 1, S65 (Abstract).Google Scholar
Santerre, L. and Suen, C. Y. (1981). Why look for a single feature to distinguish stop cognates? Journal of Phonetics 9, 163–174.Google Scholar
Summerfield, Q. (1975). How a full account of segmental perception depends on prosody. In Cohen, A. and Nooteboom, S. G. (editors), Structure and Process in Speech Perception, 51–68. New York: Springer-Verlag, pp. 51–68.Google Scholar
Volaitis, L. E. and Miller, J. E. (1992). Phonetic prototypes: influence of place of articulation and speaking rate on the internal structure of voicing categories. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 92, 723–735.Google Scholar
Weismer, G. (1979). Sensitivity of voice-onset time (VOT) measures to certain segmental features in speech production. Journal of Phonetics 7, 197–204.Google Scholar
Yeni-Komshian, G. H., Caramazza, A. and Preston, M. S. (1977). A study of voicing in Lebanese Arabic. Journal of Phonetics 5, 35–42.Google Scholar