Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T01:11:17.878Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Effects of dialect on vowel acoustics and intelligibility

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2013

Austin L. Oder ,
Cynthia G. Clopper  and
Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Austin L. Oder
Affiliation:
Department of Speech-Language-Hearing, University of [email protected]
Cynthia G. Clopper
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, Ohio State [email protected]
Sarah Hargus Ferguson
Affiliation:
Department of Communication Sciences and Disorders, University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A great deal of recent research has focused on phonetic variation among American English vowels from different dialects. This body of research continues to grow as vowels continuously undergo diachronic formant changes that become characteristic of certain dialects. Two experiments using the Nationwide Speech Project corpus (Clopper & Pisoni 2006a) explored whether the Midland dialect is more closely related acoustically and perceptually to the Mid-Atlantic or to the Southern dialect. The goal of this study was to further our understanding of acoustic and perceptual differences between two of the most marked dialects (Mid-Atlantic and Southern) and one of the least marked dialects (Midland) of American English. Ten vowels in /hVd/ context produced by one male talker from each of these three dialects were acoustically analyzed and presented to Midland listeners for identification. The listeners showed the greatest vowel identification accuracy for the Mid-Atlantic talker (95.2%), followed by the Midland talker (92.5%), and finally the Southern talker (79.7%). Vowel error patterns were consistent with vowel acoustic differences between the talkers. The results suggest that, acoustically and perceptually, the Midland and Mid-Atlantic dialects are more similar than are the Midland and Southern dialects.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 43 , Issue 1 , April 2013 , pp. 23 - 35
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

ANSI [American National Standards Institute]. 2004. Specifications for audiometers (ANSI S3.6-2004). New York: ANSI.Google Scholar
Carver, Craig M. 1987. American regional dialects: A word geography. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Bradlow, Ann R.. 2008. Perception of dialect variation in noise: Intelligibility and classification. Language and Speech 51 (3), 175–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G.,Levi, Susannah V. & Pisoni, David B.. 2006. Perceptual similarity of regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 119 (1), 566–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G.,Pierrehumbert, Janet B. & Tamati, Terrin N.. 2010. Lexical neighborhoods and phonological confusability in cross-dialect word recognition in noise. Laboratory Phonology 1 (1), 65–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Pisoni, David B.. 2006a. The Nationwide Speech Project: A new corpus of American English dialects. Speech Communication 48 (6), 633–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Pisoni, David B.. 2006b. Effects of region of origin and geographic mobility on perceptual dialect categorization. Language Variation and Change 18 (2), 193–221.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G. & Pisoni, David B.. 2007. Free classification of regional dialects of American English. Journal of Phonetics 35 (3), 421–438.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Clopper, Cynthia G.,Pisoni, David B. & de Jong, Kenneth. 2005. Acoustic characteristics of the vowel systems of six regional varieties of American English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 118 (3), 1661–1676.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, Bronwen G. & Iverson, Paul. 2004. Vowel normalization for accent: An investigation of best exemplar locations in northern and southern British English sentences. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 115 (1), 352–361.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Sarah H. 2004. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Vowel intelligibility for normal-hearing listeners. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 116 (4), 2365–2373.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ferguson, Sarah H. & Kewley-Port, Diane. 2007. Talker differences in clear and conversational speech: Acoustic characteristics of vowels. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50 (5), 1241–1255.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, Robert A. & Jacewicz, Ewa. 2009. Cross-dialectal variation in formant dynamics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 126 (5), 2603–2618.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gooskens, Charlotte & Heeringa, Wilbert. 2004. Perceptive evaluation of Levenshtein dialect distance measurements using Norwegian dialect data. Language Variation and Change 16 (3), 189–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hagiwara, Robert. 1997. Dialect variation and formant frequency: The American English vowels revisited. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1), 655–658.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heeringa, Wilbert,Johnson, Keith & Gooskens, Charlotte. 2009. Measuring Norwegian dialect distances using acoustic features. Speech Communication 51 (2), 167–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James,Getty, Laura A., Clark, Michael J. & Wheeler, Kimberlee. 1995. Acoustic characteristics of American English vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (5), 3099–3111.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jacewicz, Ewa,Fox, Robert A. & Salmons, Joseph. 2007. Vowel duration in three American English dialects. American Speech 82 (4), 367–385.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Labov, William. 1998. The three dialects of English. In Linn, Michael D. (ed.), Handbook of dialects and language variation, 39–81. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Labov, William,Ash, Sharon & Boberg, Charles. 2006. Atlas of North American English. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Nerbonne, John & Heeringa, Wilbert. 2001. Computational comparison and classification of dialects. Dialectologia et Geolinguistica 9, 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, Gordon E. & Barney, Harold L.. 1952. Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24 (2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sjölander, Kåre & Beskow, Jonas. 2006. WaveSurfer (version 1.8.5). http://www.speech.kth.se/wavesurfer/ (accessed 24 February 2010).Google Scholar
Studebaker, Gerald A. 1985. A ‘rationalized’ arcsine transform. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 28 (3), 455–462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thomas, Erik R. 2001. An acoustic analysis of vowel variation in New World English. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Wetzell, Brett. 2000. Rhythm, dialects, and the Southern Drawl. MA thesis, North Carolina State University.Google Scholar