Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:30:31.107Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Domains of assimilation: alveolars and velars in English

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Ken Lodge
Ken Lodge
Affiliation:
School of Modern Languages and European Studies, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, UK e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Assimilation phenomena involving lexical alveolars and velars are examined in a Stockport accent. It is suggested that the segment is too narrow a domain of investigation for clues to the differentiation of pairs such as leg kept and lead kept. The vowels either side of the consonantal sequence are involved in any kind of assimilation process that takes place, in many cases producing slight differences in dorsal contact between the alveolars and the velars.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 27 , Issue 1-2 , June 1997 , pp. 57 - 64
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avery, P & Rice, K. (1989). Segment structure and coronal underspecification. Phonology 6, 179–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Clements, N. & Hume, E. (1995). The internal organization of speech sounds. In Goldsmith, J.A. (editor), The handbook of phonological theory, 245–306. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Griffen, T.D. (1985). Aspects of dynamic phonology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, B. (1992). Comments on Nolan (1992). In Docherty, G. & Ladd, D.R. (editors), Papers in laboratory phonology II, 280–286. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. & Local, J.K. (1986). Long-domain resonance patterns in English. In International conference on speech input/output: techniques and applications, 304–309. Conference publication no. 258. London: IEE.Google Scholar
Local, J.K. (1992). Modelling assimilation in non-segmental rule-free synthesis. In Docherty, G. & Ladd, D.R. (editors), Papers in laboratory phonology II, 190–223. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1966). The Stockport dialect. Le maître phonétique 126, 26–30.Google Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1978). A Stockport teenager. JIPA 8, 56–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1984). Studies in the phonology of colloquial English. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1992). Assimilation, deletion paths and underspecification. Journal of Linguistics 28, 13–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1993). Underspecification, polysystemicity and non-segmental representations in phonology: an analysis of Malay. Linguistics 31, 475–519.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1994). Marked coronals in French: an underspecification approach to non-assimilation. Language Forum 2, 49–62.Google Scholar
Lodge, K.R. (1997). Review of Goldsmith, J.A. (editor), The handbook of phonological theory. Journal of Linguistics 33, 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nolan, F. (1992). The descriptive role of segments: evidence from assimilation. In Docherty, G. & Ladd, D.R. (editors). Papers in laboratory phonology II, 261–280. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J-F. (1989). On coronal transparency. Phonology 6, 317–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Paradis, C. & Prunet, J-F., (editors) (1991). The special status of coronals. (Vol. 2 of Phonetics and phonology.) San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Vincent, N.B. (1986). Constituency and syllable structure. In Durand, J. (editor) Dependency and non-linear phonology, 305–318. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
West, P. (1997). The extent of secondary articulations. Paper presented to the Fifth Manchester Phonology Meeting, Manchester, May, 1997.Google Scholar