Crossref Citations
This article has been cited by the following publications. This list is generated based on data provided by Crossref.
2009.
Illustrations of the IPA published inJIPA1998—2008.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 39,
Issue. 1,
p.
125.
Gooskens, Charlotte
van Heuven, Vincent J.
van Bezooijen, Renée
and
Pacilly, Jos J.A.
2010.
Is spoken Danish less intelligible than Swedish?.
Speech Communication,
Vol. 52,
Issue. 11-12,
p.
1022.
2010.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2009.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
129.
Olson, Kenneth S.
Mielke, Jeff
Sanicas-Daguman, Josephine
Pebley, Carol Jean
and
Paterson, Hugh J.
2010.
The phonetic status of the (inter)dental approximant.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 2,
p.
199.
BLESES, DORTHE
BASBØLL, HANS
LUM, JARRAD
and
VACH, WERNER
2011.
Phonology and lexicon in a cross-linguistic perspective: the importance of phonetics – a commentary on Stoel-Gammon's ‘Relationships between lexical and phonological development in young children’*.
Journal of Child Language,
Vol. 38,
Issue. 1,
p.
61.
Bleses, Dorthe
Basbøll, Hans
and
Vach, Werner
2011.
Is Danish difficult to acquire? Evidence from Nordic past-tense studies.
Language and Cognitive Processes,
Vol. 26,
Issue. 8,
p.
1193.
2011.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2010.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 41,
Issue. 1,
p.
127.
POULSEN, MADS
2011.
Do dyslexics have auditory input processing difficulties?.
Applied Psycholinguistics,
Vol. 32,
Issue. 2,
p.
245.
Basbøll, Hans
Kjærbæk, Laila
and
Lambertsen, Claus
2011.
The Danish noun plural landscape.
Acta Linguistica Hafniensia,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 2,
p.
81.
2012.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2011.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 42,
Issue. 1,
p.
117.
Christiansen, Thomas U.
and
Greenberg, Steven
2012.
Perceptual Confusions Among Consonants, Revisited—Cross-Spectral Integration of Phonetic-Feature Information and Consonant Recognition.
IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing,
Vol. 20,
Issue. 1,
p.
147.
Bohn, Ocke-Schwen
and
Best, Catherine T.
2012.
Native-language phonetic and phonological influences on perception of American English approximants by Danish and German listeners.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 40,
Issue. 1,
p.
109.
2013.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2012.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 43,
Issue. 1,
p.
121.
2014.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2013.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 44,
Issue. 1,
p.
109.
2015.
Illustrations of the IPA published in JIPA 1998–2014.
Journal of the International Phonetic Association,
Vol. 45,
Issue. 1,
p.
105.
Højen, Anders
and
Nazzi, Thierry
2016.
Vowel bias in Danish word‐learning: processing biases are language‐specific.
Developmental Science,
Vol. 19,
Issue. 1,
p.
41.
Ternes, Elmar
2017.
Die Eifler Regel.
NOWELE. North-Western European Language Evolution,
Vol. 70,
Issue. 1,
p.
73.
Faris, Mona M.
Best, Catherine T.
and
Tyler, Michael D.
2018.
Discrimination of uncategorised non-native vowel contrasts is modulated by perceived overlap with native phonological categories.
Journal of Phonetics,
Vol. 70,
Issue. ,
p.
1.
Greenberg, Steven
and
Christiansen, Thomas U.
2019.
The perceptual flow of phonetic information.
Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics,
Vol. 81,
Issue. 4,
p.
884.
Esling, John H.
Moisik, Scott R.
Benner, Allison
and
Crevier-Buchman, Lise
2019.
Voice Quality.