Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:04:43.914Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Coronal contrasts in Anong

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 March 2009

Ela Thurgood
Ela Thurgood*
Affiliation:
Department of English, California State University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study examines acoustic characteristics of a three-way distinction among a set of voiceless coronal fricatives and two sets of voiceless coronal affricates in Anong, an endangered Tibeto-Burman language. The study shows a lack of parallelism between the fricative and affricate series. The fricatives are well differentiated by spectral shapes and formant transitions of the following vowels, but not by the center of gravity. The affricates are well differentiated by the center of gravity, but not by spectral shapes nor by formant transitions of the following vowels. The study shows that /ʂ/ is acoustically a retroflex, while /tʂʰ tʂ/ are not.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , April 2009 , pp. 53 - 66
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bradley, David. 1994. A dictionary of the Northern Dialect of Lisu (China and Southeast Asia) (Pacific Linguistics Series C–126). Canberra: The Australian National University.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah. 1993. Phonetic properties of O'odham stop and fricative contrasts. International Journal of American Linguistics 59 (1), 16–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew, Barthmaier, Paul & Sands, Kathy. 2002. A cross-linguistic acoustic study of voiceless fricatives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 32 (2), 141–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris & Stevens, Kenneth N.. 1997. The postalveolar fricatives of Polish. In Kiritani, Shigeru, Hirose, Hajime & Fujisaki, Hiroya (eds.), Speech production in language: In honor of Osamu Fujimura, 177–193. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei & Lobanova, Alevtina. 2007. Komi-Permyak coronal obstruents: Acoustic contrasts and positional variation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (1), 51–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Wu, Zongji. 1984. Places of articulation: An investigation of Pekingese fricatives and affricates. Journal of Phonetics 12, 267–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nowak, Paweł M. 2006. The role of vowel transition and friction noise in the perception of Polish sibilants. Journal of Phonetics 34 (2), 139–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N. 1998. Acoustic phonetics. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 1988. Notes on Anong, a new language. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 11 (1), 27–63.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 2005a. A description of Anong [in Chinese] (New Found Minority Languages of China). Beijing: Institute of Minority Studies.Google Scholar
Sun, Hongkai. 2005b. The Anong language: Studies of a language decline. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 173, 143–157.Google Scholar
Svantesson, Jan-Olof. 1986. Acoustic analysis of Chinese fricatives and affricates. Journal of Chinese Linguistics 14 (1), 53–70.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Ela. 2007. Phonetic variation in Anong vowels. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences, 609–612. Saarbrücken.Google Scholar
Thurgood, Graham. 2003. The causatives in Sun Hongkai's Anong: Language death and rapid restructuring. In Nowak, Paweł M., Yoquelet, Corey & Mortensen, David (eds.), Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society (BLS 29), 463–471.Google Scholar