Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:29:58.953Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Characteristics of Atypical Speech currently not included in the Extensions to the IPA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Barbara Bernhardt  and
Martin J. Ball
Barbara Bernhardt
Affiliation:
School of Audiology and Speech Science, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia V6T 1Z3, Canada
Martin J. Ball
Affiliation:
Department of Communication, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtownabbey, Co. Antrim BT37 0QB. N.Ireland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The Extensions to the IPA for the transcription of disordered speech and voice quality (extIPA) were approved at the 1989 IPA Congress in Kiel (see Duckworth et al. 1990, Ball 1991). A transcription system for disordered speech needs to provide sufficient diversity of symbols and diacritics to account for the majority of observed phonetic variants. Creation of standard new symbols and diacritics for every observed variant is ultimately counterproductive. We submit that the following phenomena have been observed frequently enough and have sufficient diagnostic and therapeutic implications to warrant consideration as new extensions to the IPA. We do not imply, however, that these are the only atypical speech production phenomena that may, in the long run, be worthy of inclusion in a revised extIPA, and we look forward to further suggestions from clinicians and phoneticians.

Type
Phonetic Representation: b) Revision of the IPA
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 23 , Issue 1 , June 1993 , pp. 35 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, M. J. (1991). Computer coding of the IPA: Extensions to the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 21, 36–41.Google Scholar
Ball, M. J. (1993). Phonetics for Speech Pathology. 2nd Ed.London: Whurr.Google Scholar
Bernhardt, B. (1992). The application of nonlinear phonological theory to intervention with one phonologically disordered child. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 6, 283–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Duckworth, M., Allen, G., Hardcastle, W. and Ball, M. J. (1990). Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for the transcription of atypical speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 4, 273–280.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, F. and Hardcastle, W. (1989). Deviant articulation in a cleft palate child following late repair of the hard palate: a description and remediation procedure using electropalatography (EPG). Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 3, 93–110.Google Scholar
Laver, J. (1980) The Phonetic Description of Voice Quality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
PRDS (1982) Final Report on the Phonetic Representation of Disordered Speech. London: The King's Fund.Google Scholar