Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T13:06:11.387Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Another note on RP notation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Gordon Walsh
Gordon Walsh
Affiliation:
(Materials Development Unit, ELT Division, Longman Group)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Windsor Lewis's recent article (1972b) admirably summarizes the case for a Gimson-type transcription as a reference tool for EFL students. As he states, his own ‘CPD’ (Windsor Lewis, 1972a) transcription clearly—and sensibly—derives from the system established by Gimson (1962, 1970) in ‘the standard up-to-date description of Received Pronunciation’. On general principles, there is little that could usefully be added to Windsor Lewis's (1972b) comments on three other transcription types that are increasingly coming to be regarded as inappropriate for EFL purposes:

(i) that used by Abercrombie (1964), which, as Windsor Lewis (1972b: 60–63) shows, has disadvantages in its choice of detail symbols (though in underlying philosophy this system is perhaps closer to ‘CPD’ than is the latter's acknowledged parent);

(ii) the long-established ‘EPD’ (Jones, 1917) system, with its inconsistent treatment of the monophthong phonemes;

(iii) the ‘simplified’ (Jones, 1956: 346 ff.) types of transcription first used in books by Scott (1942) and MacCarthy (1944, 1945) and taken up by Kingdon (West, 1965) and others, which although useful for the Ll speaker are grossly misleading for the EFL student in implying a solely quantitative distinction between such pairs as the vowels of seat and sit.

This article will largely take for granted Windsor Lewis's comments on those types, and will concentrate on some aspects of the system discussed by Windsor Lewis (1972b) and applied in his CPD and the new third edition (1974) of the Advanced Learner's Dictionary.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , June 1974 , pp. 31 - 36
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1974

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1964). English Phonetic Texts. London: Faber & Faber.Google Scholar
Byrne, D., and Walsh, G. (1973). Listening Comprehension 1: Pronunciation Practice, teacher's book. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1962). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. London: Edward Arnold (2nd edn, 1970).Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1917). English Pronouncing Dictionary (‘EPD’). London: Dent (and subsequent editions).Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1950). The Pronunciation of English. Cambridge: University Press (3rd edn; and 4th edn, 1956).Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1956). An Outline of English Phonetics. Cambridge: Heffer (8th edn; and subsequent editions).Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Windsor (1972 a). A Concise Pronouncing Dictionary of British and American English (‘CPD’). London: Oxford U.P.Google Scholar
Lewis, J. Windsor (1972 b). ‘The notation of the General British English segments’, JIPA, vol. 2, no. 2, December 1972.Google Scholar
MacCarthy, P. A. D. (1944). English Pronunciation. Cambridge: Heffer (and subsequent editions).Google Scholar
MacCarthy, P. A. D. (1945). An English Pronouncing Vocabulary. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Scott, N. C. (1942). English Conversations. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
West, M. (1965). An International Reader's Dictionary (with transcription by Roger Kingdon). London: Longman.Google Scholar