Hostname: page-component-6d856f89d9-mhpxw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-16T08:41:14.290Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

An exploratory investigation of interactions between syllabic prominence, initial geminates, and phrasal boundaries in Pattani Malay

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 November 2023

Francesco Burroni
Affiliation:
Cornell University Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University
Sireemas Maspong
Affiliation:
Cornell University Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University
Pittayawat Pittayaporn*
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University
Pimthip Kochaiyaphum
Affiliation:
Center of Excellence in Southeast Asian Linguistics, Chulalongkorn University
*
*Corresponding author. Email: [email protected]

Abstract

This study investigates interactions among relative syllabic prominence, initial geminates (IGs), and prosodic boundaries in Pattani Malay (PM) against a background of previous analyses claiming that IGs are moraic and trigger a ‘stress shift’ or the linking of a pitch accent to the initial syllable. We conducted an acoustic study with fourteen PM speakers, producing singleton–IG minimal pairs in naturalistic sentences. Our results show that the presence of IGs is not associated with the hypothesized phonological changes. Instead, it is associated with moderate increases in the duration of initial syllables, the intensity of the initial syllable vowels, and the f0 of the initial and final syllable vowels. On the other hand, the presence of a phrase-final prosodic boundary correlates with more drastic changes: in phrase-final position, final syllables exhibit final lengthening and falling contours of f0 and intensity, while, in the phrase-medial position, no lengthening is observed and f0 contours are rising. Furthermore, the effects of IGs are strongest in the phrase-final position, suggesting interactions between IGs and prosodic boundaries. Taken together, results cast doubts on the claim that IGs are moraic and associated with categorical differences in syllabic prominence profiles in PM and show that IG effects are modulated by prosodic boundaries.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

These authors contribute equally to this work and share first authorship.

References

Abramson, Arthur S. 1986. The perception of word-initial consonant length: Pattani Malay. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 16(1), 816.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 1987. Word-initial consonant length in Pattani Malay. International Congress of Phonetic Association 6, 6870.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 1998. The complex acoustic output of a single articulatory gesture: Pattani Malay word-initial consonant length. In Warotamasikkhadit, Udom and Panakul, Thanyarat (eds.), Papers from the Fourth Annual Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 120, Arizona State University, Program for Southeast Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 2003. Acoustic cues to word-initial stop length in Pattani Malay. In Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquin (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, 387390.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 2004. Toward prosodic contrast: Suai and Pattani Malay, In Bel, Bernard & Marlien, Isabelle (eds.), International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages: Emphasis on Tone Languages. The Institute of Linguistics, Chinese Academy of Social Science, Beijing, 14.Google Scholar
Atal, Bishnu S. 1972. Automatic speaker recognition based on pitch contours. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 52, 16871697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2020. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 6.1.12). Available at: www.praat.org/ [last accessed 21 September 2023].Google Scholar
Burroni, Francesco, Lau-Preechathammarach, Raksit & Maspong, Sireemas. 2022. Unifying initial geminates and fortis consonants via laryngeal specification: Three case studies from Dunan, Pattani Malay, and Salentino, In Jurgec, Peter, Duncan, Liisa, Elfner, Emily, Kang, Yoonjung, Kochetov, Alexei, O’Neill, Brittney K., Ozburn, Avery, Rice, Keren, Sanders, Nathan, Schertz, Jessamyn, Shaftoe, Nate, & Sullivan, Lisa (eds.), Proceedings of the 2021 Annual Meeting on Phonology, 113. Washington, DC: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Burroni, Francesco, Maspong, Sireemas, Pittayaporn, Pittayawat & Kochaiyaphum, Pimthip. 2020. A new look at Pattani Malay Initial Geminates: A statistical and machine learning approach. In Proceedings of the 34th Pacific Asia Conference on Language, Information and Computation, 21–29. Hanoi: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Byrd, Dani & Saltzman, Elliot. 2003. The elastic phrase: Modeling the dynamics of boundary-adjacent lengthening. Journal of Phonetics 31(2), 149180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chotikakamthorn, Maneerat. 1981. A comparative study of phonology in Satun Malay and Pattani Malay. Master’s thesis, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Cohn, Abigail C. 1989. Stress in Indonesian and bracketing paradoxes. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 7(2), 167216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, James T. 1989. Malay dialect research in Malaysia: The issue of perspective. Bijdragen tot de Taal-, Land- en Volkenkunde. Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Southeast Asia and Oceania 145(2), 235264.Google Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011a. Quantity. In Goldsmith, John, Riggle, Jason & Yu, Alan C. L. (eds.), The handbook of phonological theory, 2nd edn, 103140. Chichester and Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, Stuart. 2011b. Geminates. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume & Rice, Keren (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 1, 837859, Malden, MA & Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Edwards, Jan, Beckman, Mary E. & Fletcher, Janet. 1991. The articulatory kinematics of final lengthening. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1), 369382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frigo, Matteo & Johnson, Steven G.. 1998. FFTW: An adaptive software architecture for the FFT. In The 1998 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, vol. 3, 1381–1384, Seattle.Google Scholar
Gałecki, Andrzej & Burzykowski, Burzykowski. 2013. Linear mixed-effects models using R: A step-by-step approach (Springer Texts in Statistics). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gandour, Jack. 1979. Tonal rules for English loanwords in Thai. In Luangthongkam, Theraphan (ed.), Studies in Tai and Mon-Khmer phonetics and phonology in honour of E. J. A. Henderson, 94105. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University Press.Google Scholar
Goedemans, Rob & van Zanten, Ellen. 2007. Stress and accent in Indonesian. Prosody in Indonesian Languages, 35–62. Ultrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. Word stress: Theoretical and typological issues, 83118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Roettger, Timo. 2017. Acoustic correlates of word stress: A cross-linguistic survey. Linguistics Vanguard 3(1), 20170007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hajek, John & Goedemans, Rob. 2003. Word-initial geminates and stress in Pattani Malay. The Linguistic Review 20(1), 7994. https://doi.org/10.1515/tlir.2003.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halim, Amran. 1974. Intonation in relation to syntax in Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Djambatan.Google Scholar
Hamzah, Hilmi. 2013. The acoustics and perception of the word-initial singleton/geminate contrast in Kelantan Malay. Doctoral dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Hamzah, M. Hilmi, Fletcher, Janet & Hajek, John. 2011. Durational correlates of word-initial voiceless geminate stops: The case of Kelantan Malay. In Lee, Wai Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 815818. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Hamzah, M. Hilmi, Fletcher, Janet & Hajek, John. 2014. Amplitude and f0 as acoustic correlates of Kelantan Malay word-initial geminates. In Hay, Jennifer & Parnell, Emma (eds.), Proceedings of the 15th Australasian International Conference on Speech Science and Technology, 6366. Christchurch: Australian Speech Science and Technology Association.Google Scholar
Heuven, Vincent J. van, Roosman, Lilie M. & van Zanten, Ellen. 2008. Betawi Malay word prosody. Lingua 118, 12711287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heuven, Vincent J. van & van Zanten, Ellen (eds.). 2007. Prosody in Indonesian languages. Utrecht: LOT.Google Scholar
Huang, Xuedong, Acero, Alex & Hon, Hsiao-Wuen. 2001. Spoken language processing: A guide to theory, algorithm, and system development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall PTR.Google Scholar
Iemwanthong, Kanyarat. 2008. Acoustic characteristics of Pattani Malay vowels. Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Kaland, Constantijn. 2019. Acoustic correlates of word stress in Papuan Malay. Journal of Phonetics 74, 5574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaland, Constantijn. 2021. The perception of word stress cues in Papuan Malay: A typological perspective and experimental investigation. Laboratory Phonology. Open Library of Humanities 12(1), 133.Google Scholar
Kaland, Constantijn & Baumann, Stefan. 2020. Demarcating and highlighting in Papuan Malay phrase prosody. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 147(4), 29742988.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kluge, Angela. 2017. A grammar of Papuan Malay (Studies in Diversity Linguistics), vol. 11. Berlin: Language Science Press.Google Scholar
Kraehenmann, Astrid. 2011. Initial geminates. In Marc van Oostendorp, Colin J. Ewen, Elizabeth Hume, & Keren Rice (eds.), The Blackwell companion to phonology, vol. 2, 11241146. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Kraehenmann, Astrid & Lahiri, Aditi. 2008. Duration differences in the articulation and acoustics of Swiss German word-initial geminate and singleton stops. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 123, 44464455.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Krisnapan, Daranee. 1985. A phonology of Taba Malay. Master’s thesis, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert. 1984. Declination: A review and some hypotheses. Phonology Yearbook 1, 5374.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maskikit-Essed, Raechel & Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2016. No stress, no pitch accent, no prosodic focus: The case of Ambonese Malay. Phonology 33, 353389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MATLAB. 2021. version 9.10.0.1602886 (R2021a). Natick, MA: The MathWorks Inc.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Michael, Michaela Socolof, Sarah Mihuc, Wagner, Michael & Sonderegger, Morgan. 2017. Montreal Forced Aligner. Available at: http://montrealcorpustools.github.io/Montreal-Forced-Aligner/ [last accessed 21 September 2023].Google Scholar
McDonnell, Bradley. 2016. Acoustic correlates of stress in Besemah. NUSA: Linguistic studies of languages in and around Indonesia 60, 128.Google Scholar
Mirman, Daniel. 2014. Growth curve analysis and visualization using R. Boca Raton, CA: Chapman & Hall/CRC the R series.Google Scholar
Mohd Don, Zuraidah, Knowles, Gerry & Yong, Janet. 2008. How words can be misleading: A study of syllable timing and “stress” in Malay. Linguistics Journal 3(2), 6681.Google Scholar
Muller, Jennifer. 2001. The phonology and phonetics of word-initial geminates. Ph.D. dissertation, Ohio State University.Google Scholar
National Statistical Office. 2012. The 2010 population and housing census: Southern region. Bangkok: National Statistical Office.Google Scholar
Pakkhem, Siriwan. 2007. A phonological comparison of Pattani Malay as spoken in Narathiwat, Krabu and Pathumthani. Master’s thesis, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Paramal, Waemaji. 1991. Long consonants in Pattani Malay: The result of word and phrase shortening. Master’s thesis, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Phuengnoi, Nattaphon. 2010. An acoustic study of stressed and unstressed syllables in Pattani Malay and Urak Lawoi. Master’s thesis, Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat & Iamdanush, Jakrabhop. 2014. Metrical stress in Pattani Malay. Presented at the 24th Annual Meeting of Southeast Asian Linguistics Society.Google Scholar
Poonsub, Areeluk. 2016. The linguistic identity factors in the question of Southern border provinces: Some policy recommendations for the Thai state. In Yunyasit, Suphatmet (ed.), Collections of studies in the linguistic status in Southern border provinces, 157181. Nakornpathom: Institute of Human Rights and Peace Studies, Mahidol University.Google Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai & Burarungrot, Mirinda. 2018. Patani Malay-Thai bi/multilingual education in Thailand’s Deep South. In Premsrirat, Suwilai & Hirsh, David (eds.), Language revitalization: Insights from Thailand, 239250. Bern: Peter Lang.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Premsrirat, Suwilai & Burarungrot, Mirinda. 2022. Multilingualism, bi/multilingual education and social inclusion: A case study in Southern Thailand. MANUSYA: Journal of Humanities 24(3), 373389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ridouane, Rachid. 2007. Gemination in Tashlhiyt Berber: An acoustic and articulatory study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37, 119142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ringen, Catherine & Vago, Robert M.. 2010. Geminates: Heavy or long? In Charles Cairns & Eric Raimy (eds.), Handbook of the syllable. Leiden: Brill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smalley, William A. 1994. Linguistic diversity and national unity: Language ecology in Thailand. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Steffman, Jeremy. 2019. Phrase-final lengthening modulates listeners’ perception of vowel duration as a cue to coda stop voicing. Journal of Acoustical Society of America 145, EL560EL566.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Topintzi, Nina. 2008. On the existence of moraic onsets. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 26, 147184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topintzi, Nina. 2010. Onsets: Suprasegmental and prosodic behaviour. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Topintzi, Nina. 2016. Iquito: The prosodic colon and evaluation of OT stress accounts. In Heinz, Jeffrey, Goedemans, Rob & van der Hulst, Harry (eds.), Dimensions of phonological stress, 123167. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina & Davis, Stuart. 2017. On the weight of edge geminates. In Kubozono, Haruo (ed.), The phonetics and phonology of geminate consonants, 260282. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Topintzi, Nina & Nevins, Andrew I.. 2017. Moraic onsets in Arrernte. Phonology 34(4), 615650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turk, Alice E. & Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie. 2007. Multiple targets of phrase-final lengthening in American English words. Journal of Phonetics 35(4), 445472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Uthai, Ruslan. 1993. A comparison of word formation in standard Malay and Pattani Malay. Bangkok: Chulalongkorn University.Google Scholar
Uthai, Ruslan. 2011. Keistimewaan dialek Malayu Patani. Bangi: Penerbit Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia.Google Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari & Price, Patti J.. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91(3), 17071717. https://doi.org/10.1121/1.402450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yao, Yao, Tilsen, Sam, Sprouse, Ronald L. & Johnson., Keith 2010. Automated measurement of vowel formants in the Buckeye Corpus. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report 6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yupho, Nawanit. 1989. Consonant clusters and stress rules in Pattani Malay. Mon-Khmer Studies 15, 125137.Google Scholar