Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T09:12:05.862Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An acoustic study of Kabardian vowels

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

John D. Choi
John D. Choi
Affiliation:
Department of Linguistics, UCLA, Los Angeles, California 90024–1543
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The results of a spectrographic study of the Kabardian vowel system confirm reports in the literature that phonetic vowel quality in Kabardian is determined by the preceding consonant. The data further show that there are three distinct phonetic categories along the F1 axis in the vowel space, and that the contextually determined variation in vowel coloring generally respects this division. Durationally, a correspondence was found between vowel height and duration. While the durational differences were found to be comparable to those reported in languages with contrastive vowel length, the differences were interpreted as a phonetic strategy to enhance the perceptual salience of the vertical vowel system.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , June 1991 , pp. 4 - 12
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Catford, J. C. (1942). The Kabardian language. Le Maîitre Phonétique 78, 15–18.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1984). Instrumental data and linguistic phonetics. In Higgs, J. W. and Thelwall, R. (editors), Occasional Papers in Linguistics and Language Learning 9, 23–48. Coleraine: The New University of Ulster.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1988). Vowel systems of Caucasian languages. Unpublished MS.Google Scholar
Colarusso, J. (1988). Kabardian. Unpublished MS. McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.Google Scholar
Colarusso, J. (1989). The Phonology of the Northwest Caucasian Languages. New York: Garland Publishing, Inc.Google Scholar
Elert, C. C. (1965). Phonologic Studies of Quantity in Swedish. Uppsala: Språkförlaget Skriptor.Google Scholar
Halle, M. (1970). Is Kabardian a vowel-less language? Foundations of Language 6, 95–103.Google Scholar
Jakobson, R. (1941). Kindersprache, Aphasie und allgemeine Lautgesetze. Språkvetenskapliga Sällsakapets i Uppsala Förhandlingar 1940–1942. Uppsala: Almqvist and Wiksell. (Reprinted in Jakobson R. (1962). Selected Writings, Vol. I, 328–401. The Hague: Mouton.)Google Scholar
Jakovlev, N. F. (1923). Tablitsy Fonetiki Kabardinskogo Jazyka. Moscow.Google Scholar
Keating, P. and Huffman, M. (1984). Vowel variation in Japanese. Phonetica 41, 191–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kuipers, A. H. (1960). Phoneme and Morpheme in Kabardian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lindblom, B. (1986). Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, J. and Jaeger, J. (editors), Experimental Phonology, 13–44. Orlando: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Peterson, G. E. and Lehiste, I. (1960). Duration of syllable nuclei in English. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 32, 693–703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shagirov, A. K. (1967). Kabardinskij jazyk. In Bokarev, E. A. et al. (editors) Jazyki Narodov SSSR, Vol. 4, Iberijsko-Kavkazskie Jazyki, 165–183. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Stevens, K., Keyser, S. J., and Kawasaki, H. (1986). Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Perkell, J. and Klatt, D. (editors), Invariance and Variability in Speech Processes, 426–449. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1925). Review of Jakovlev ‘Tablitsy fonetiki kabardinskogo jazyka’, Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 36, 277. Paris.Google Scholar
Zwirner, E. and Zwirner, K. (1936). Grundfragen der Phonometrie. Berlin: Metten & Co.Google Scholar