Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jkksz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:27:05.055Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

An acoustic and perceptual study of Connemara Irish palatalization

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2012

Máire Ní Chiosáin  and
Jaye Padgett
Máire Ní Chiosáin
Affiliation:
University College [email protected]
Jaye Padgett
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Palatalization contrasts are subject to certain asymmetries across languages (Takatori 1997, Kochetov 2002). For example, they are preferred at the beginning of words or syllables rather than at the end, and they are preferred in coronals rather than labials. Kochetov (2002, 2004) argues that these asymmetries are perceptually motivated, and he provides supporting evidence from Russian. We report on results of an acoustic and perceptual study of palatalization in Connemara Irish. Our acoustic analysis documents a range of properties distinguishing palatalized from non-palatalized consonants in Irish, though our acoustic data come from only one speaker. Based on a speeded AX discrimination task, our perceptual results in some ways parallel Kochetov's for Russian (listeners show degraded performance for the coda contrast compared to the onset contrast), and in some ways do not (they do not perform better on coronals than on labials).

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , August 2012 , pp. 171 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avanesov, Ruben Ivanovich. 1972. Russkoe literaturnoe proiznoshenie. Moscow: Prosveshchenie.Google Scholar
Babel, Molly & Johnson, Keith. 2010. Accessing psycho-acoustic perception and language-specific perception with speech sounds. Laboratory phonology 1 (1), 179–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Hamann, Silke. 2008. The evolution of auditory dispersion in bidirectional constraint grammars. Phonology 25, 217–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2007. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer. http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Liia Vasil'evna. 1998. Fonetika sovremennogo russkogo iazyka. St. Petersburg.Google Scholar
Bondarko, Liia Vasil'evna & Zinder, Lev Rafailovich. 1966. O nekotorykh differentsial'nykh priznakakh russkikh soglasnykh fonem. Voprosy iazykoznaniia 1, 10–14.Google Scholar
Choi, John. 1995. An acoustic-phonetic underspecification account of Marshallese vowel allophony. Journal of phonetics 23, 323–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Bhaldraithe, Tomás. 1945. The Irish of Chois Fhairrge. Dublin: The Dublin Institute for Advanced Studies.Google Scholar
Derkach, M. 1975. Acoustic cues of softness in Russian syllables and their application in automatic speech recognition. In Fant, Gunnar & Tatham, Marcel A. A. (eds.), Auditory analysis and perception of speech, 349–358. London: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fant, Gunnar. 1960. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Fujimura, Osamu, Macchi, Marian & Streeter, Lynn A.. 1978. Perception of stop consonants with conflicting transitional cues: A cross-linguistic study. Language and speech 21, 337–346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, David. 1973. The growth of palatalization in Irish. Proceedings of the Philological Society 72 (1), 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halle, Morris. 1959. The sound pattern of Russian. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
International Phonetic Association (IPA). 1999. Handbook of the International Phonetic Association. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Jakobson, Roman, Fant, Gunnar & Halle, Morris. 1952. Preliminaries to speech analysis. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, Keith & Babel, Molly. 2010. On the perceptual basis of distinctive features: Evidence from the perception of fricatives by Dutch and English speakers. Journal of phonetics 38, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingston, John & Diehl, Randy L.. 1994. Phonetic knowledge. Language 70 (3), 419–454.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei. 2002. Production, perception, and emergent phonotactic patterns. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Kochetov, Alexei. 2004. Perception of place and secondary articulation contrasts in different syllable positions: Language-particular and language-independent asymmetries. Language and Speech 47 (4), 351–382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kochetov, Alexei. 2006. Testing licensing by cue: A case of Russian palatalized coronals. Phonetica 63, 113–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter, Ladefoged, Jenny, Turk, Alice, Hind, Kevin & Skilton, St John. 1998. Phonetic structures of Scottish Gaelic. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 28 (1–2), 1–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Björn. 1986. Phonetic universals in vowel systems. In Ohala, John J. & Jaeger, Jeri J. (eds.), Experimental phonology, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Macmillan, Neil A. & Creelman, C. Douglas. 1991. Signal detection: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe. 1990. A pilot study of articulatory and acoustic measurements of coarticulation in Irish (Gaelic). Esprit II/Basic Research Action No. 3279. Progress Report.Google Scholar
Ní Chasaide, Ailbhe. 1995. Irish. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 25, 34–39.Google Scholar
Ní, Chiosáin Máire & Padgett, Jaye. 2001. Markedness, segment realization, and locality in spreading. In Linda, Lombardi (ed.), Segmental phonology in Optimality Theory: Constraints and representations, 118–156. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ó Siadhail, Mícheál. 1989. Modern Irish. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1981. The listener as a source of sound change. In Masek, Carrie S., Hendrick, Roberta A. & Miller, Mary Frances (eds.), Chicago Linguistic Society: Papers from the Parasession on Language and Behavior, 178–203. Chicago, IL: Chicago Linguistic Society.Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1990. The phonetics and phonology of aspects of assimilation. In Kingston, John & Beckman, Mary E. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology, 258–275. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 2001. Contrast dispersion and Russian palatalization. In Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.), The role of speech perception in phonology, 187–218. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Padgett, Jaye. 2003. The emergence of contrastive palatalization in Russian. In Holt, D. Eric (ed.), Optimality Theory and language change, 307–335. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pisoni, David B. 1973. Auditory and phonetic memory codes in the discrimination of consonants and vowels. Perception and Psychophysics 13, 253–260.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Purcell, Edward T. 1979. Formant frequency patterns in Russian VCV utterances. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66 (6), 1691–1702.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Repp, Bruno H. 1979. Relative amplitude of aspiration noise as a voicing cue for syllable-initial stop consonants. Language and Speech 22 (2), 173–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Richey, Colleen. 2000. Cues for place and palatalization in Russian stops. Ms., Stanford University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinu, Laura. 2007. Perceptual properties of palatalization in Romanian. In Camacho, José, Flores-Ferrán, Nydia, Sánchez, Liliana, Déprez, Viviane & Cabrera, María J. (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2006: The 36th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 303–317. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Spinu, Laura. 2009. Romanian palatalization: The role of place of articulation in perception. In Masullo, Pascual J., O'Rourke, Erin & Huang, Chia-Hui (eds.), Romance Linguistics 2007: The 37th Linguistic Symposium on Romance Languages (LSRL), 277–289. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 1997. Phonetics in phonology: The case of laryngeal neutralization. Ms., University of California, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth & Keyser, Samuel Jay. 1989. Primary features and their enhancements in consonants. Language 65, 81–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth N., Keyser, Samuel Jay & Kawasaki, Haruko. 1986. Toward a phonetic and phonological theory of redundant features. In Perkell, Joseph S., Klatt, Dennis H., & Stevens, Kenneth N. (eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes, 426–449. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Takatori, Yuki. 1997. A study of constraint interaction in Slavic phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, Yale University.Google Scholar
Wedel, Andy. 2004. Self-organization and categorical behavior in phonology. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Cruz.Google Scholar
Zubkova, Liudmila Georgievna. 1974. Foneticheskaia realizatsiia konsonantnykh protivopolozhenii v russkom iazyke. Moscow: Universitet Druzhby Narodov.Google Scholar