Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-mkpzs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T12:29:27.310Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Acoustic properties of vowels in Upper Necaxa Totonac

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2019

Michelle García-Vega  and
Benjamin V. Tucker
Michelle García-Vega
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Benjamin V. Tucker
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Upper Necaxa Totonac is a Totonacan language spoken in the Necaxa River valley in the Sierra Norte of Puebla State, Mexico. While the Totonacan languages historically have three phonemic vowel qualities, the Upper Necaxa system consists of five vowels that contrast length and laryngealization. With acoustic data from six native speakers from the Totonacan communities of Patla and Chicontla, we explore the phonetic properties of vowels with respect to the first and second formant frequencies, quantity (duration), vowel phonation (modal vs. laryngeal), and stress. The data indicate that long, short, modal and laryngeal vowels occupy a similar formant space and that duration is the primary phonetic correlate of phonemic vowel length. A shift in vowel quality and an increase in duration and pitch were shown to be the acoustic characteristics of stress. The study provides a first acoustic analysis of vowels in Upper Necaxa, and contributes to typological descriptions of the properties of vowels connected with quality, quantity, stress, and phonation.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 51 , Issue 1 , April 2021 , pp. 55 - 74
Check for updates
Copyright
© International Phonetic Association 2019

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón Montero, Rafael. 2008. Indicios acusticos de las vocales rechinadas del totonaco [Acoustic properties of laryngealized vowels in Totonac]. In Zendejas, Esther Herrera & Butragueño, Pedro Martín (eds.), Fonología instrumental: patrones fónicos y variación [Instrumental phonology: Phonetic patterns and variation], 120–138. Mexico City: El Colegio de MéxicoGoogle Scholar
Allen, Micah, Poggiali, Davide, Whitaker, Kirstie, Marshall, Tom R. & Kievit, Rogier. 2018. Raincloud plots: A multi-platform tool for robust data visualization. PeerJ Preprints 6:e27137v1. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.27137v1 (accessed October 2018).Google Scholar
Aschmann, Herman P. 1946. Totonaco phonemes. International Journal of American Linguistics 12, 34–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baayen, R. Harald, Davidson, Doug J. & Bates, Douglas M.. 2008. Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language 59, 390–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barreda, Santiago. 2013. phonTools: Functions for phonetics in R. R package (version 0.1-6). http://www2.uaem.mx/r-mirror/web/packages/phonTools/index.html.Google Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben & Walker, Steve. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, David. 2004. A grammatical sketch of Upper Necaxa Totonac. Munich: Lincom Europa.Google Scholar
Beck, David. 2006. The emergence of ejective fricatives in Upper Necaxa Totonac. University of Alberta Working Papers in Linguistics 1, 1–18.Google Scholar
Beck, David. 2008. Ideophones, adverbs, and predicate qualification in Upper Necaxa Totonac. International Journal of American Linguistics 74, 1–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, David. 2011. Upper Necaxa Totonac dictionary. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110238235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beck, David. 2014. Totonacan languages. Presented by invitation at Workshop on the State of the Arts in Mesoamerican Languages, Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology, Leipzig, 6–7 December.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2013. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.59). http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 6 April 2013).Google Scholar
Brown, Cecil H., Beck, David, Kondrak, Grzegorz, Watters, James K. & Wichmann, Søren. 2011. Totozoquean. International Journal of American Linguistics 77, 323–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flemming, Edward. 2006. A phonetically-based model of phonological vowel reduction. Ms., MIT.Google Scholar
Fry, Dennis B. 1955. Duration and intensity as physical correlates of linguistic stress. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 27, 765–768.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fry, Dennis B. 1958. Experiments in the perception of stress. Language and Speech 1, 126–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew. 1998. The phonetics and phonology of non-modal vowels: A cross-linguistic perspective. Berkeley Linguistic Society 24 (BLS 24), 93–105.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, Eugenie. 1967. Vowel length and vowel quality in Khasi. Bulletin of the School of Oriental and African Studies 30, 564–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herrera Zendejas, Esther. 2009. Formas sonoras: mapa fónico de las lenguas mexicanas [Sound forms: A phonetic map of Mexican languages]. México: El Colegio de México.Google Scholar
Holton, Gary. 2000. The phonology and morphology of the Tanacross Athabaskan language. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Santa Barbara.Google Scholar
INEGI [Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía]. 2010. Censo de Publación y Vivienda de 2010 [Census of Population and Housing Units]. http://www.inegi.org.mx/est/contenidos/proyectos/ccpv/cpv2010/Default.aspx (accessed 21 December 2011).Google Scholar
Kari, James M. 1990. Ahtna Athabaskan dictionary. Fairbanks, AL: Alaska Native Language Center.Google Scholar
Kavitskaya, Darya. 2014. Compensatory lengthening: Phonetics, phonology, diachrony. New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirchner, Robert & Varelas, Eleni. 2002. A cue-based approach to the phonotactics of Upper Necaxa Totonac. Presented at 7th Workshop on Structure and Constituency in the Languages of the Americas, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta.Google Scholar
Kirk, Paul, Ladefoged, Jenny & Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. Quantifying acoustic properties of modal, breathy, and creaky vowels in Jalapa Mazatec. In Mattina, Anthony & Montler, Timothy (eds.), American Indian linguistics and ethnography in honor of Laurence C. Thompson, 435–450. Missoula, MT: University of Montana Press.Google Scholar
Kuznetsova, Alexandra, Brockhoff, Per B. & Christensen, Rune H.B.. 2016. lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package (version 2. 0–33). https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=lmerTest (accessed October 2018).Google Scholar
Lam, Yvonne. 2009. The straw that broke the language’s back: Language shift in the Upper Necaxa Valley of Mexico. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 195, 219–233.Google Scholar
Lam, Yvonne. 2012. Oportunidad, ideologia y la perdida del totonaco del rio Necaxa [Opportunity, ideology and the loss of Upper Necaxa Totonac]. In Levy, Paulette & Beck, David (eds.), Las lenguas totonacas y tepehuas: Textos y otros materiales para su estudio [The Totonac and Tepehua languages: Texts and other reference materials], 519–543. Mexico City: Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico.Google Scholar
Lam, Yvonne & Beck, David. 2008. Language loss and linguistic suicide: A case study from the Sierra Norte de Puebla. In Cummins, Sarah, Janoski, Brigit & Shaw, Patricia A. (eds.), All the things you are: A Festschrift for Jack Chambers, 5–16. Toronto: Toronto Working Papers in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Lehnert-LeHouillier, Heike. 2010. A cross-linguistic investigation of cues to vowel length perception. Journal of Phonetics 38, 472–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindblom, Bjorn. 1963. Spectrographic study of vowel reduction. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 35, 1773–1781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
MacKay, Carolyn J. & Trechsel, Frank R.. 2013. A sketch of Pisaflores Tepehua Phonology 1. International Journal of American Linguistics 79, 189–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McFarland, Teresa A. 2009. The phonology and morphology of Filomeno Mata Totonac. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California Berkeley.Google Scholar
Muehlbauer, Jeffrey. 2012. Vowel spaces in Plains Cree. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 42, 91–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nearey, Terrance M. 1978. Phonetic feature systems for vowels. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Linguistics Club.Google Scholar
Nolan, Francis. 2003. Intonational equivalence: An experimental evaluation of pitch scales. Proceedings of the 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Barcelona, 771–774.Google Scholar
Puderbaugh, Rebekka. 2015. Contextual effects on the duration of ejective fricatives in Upper Necaxa Totonac. Proceedings of the 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVIII), Glasgow, 931–934.Google Scholar
Puderbaugh, Rebekka. 2016. Acoustic characteristics of obstruents in Huehuetla Tepehua. Journal of the Canadian Acoustical Association 44(3), 140–141.Google Scholar
Puderbaugh, Rebekka & Tucker, Benjamin V.. 2013. Acoustic features of Upper Necaxa Totonac ejective fricatives. Presented at the 166th Meeting of the Acoustical Society of America, San Francisco, CA.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2017. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.R-project.org/.Google Scholar
Román Lobato, Gabriela. 2008. La juntura fonológica en el totonaco de Ozelonacaxtla, Huehuetla, Puebla [Phonological junctures of Ozelonacaxtla Totonac]. Master’s thesis, Centro de Investigaciones y Estudios Superiores en Antropología Social.Google Scholar
Shih, Chilin & Lu, Hsin Yi Dora. 2015. Effects of talker-to-listener distance on tone. Journal of Phonetics 51, 6–35.Google Scholar
Trechsel, Frank R. & Faber, Alice. 1992. Acoustic properties of plain and laryngealized vowels in the Misantla dialect of Totonac. Ms., Universidad de las Américas-Puebla, Mexico.Google Scholar
Tuttle, Siri G. 1998. Metrical and tonal structures in Tanana Athabaskan. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, Siri G. 2005. Duration, intonation and prominence in Apache. In Hargus, Sharon & Rice, Keren (eds.), Athabaskan prosody, 319–344. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuttle, Siri G., Lovick, Olga & Núñez-Ortiz, Isabel. 2011. Vowels of Upper Tanana Athabascan. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41, 283–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warner, Natasha, Jongman, Allard, Sereno, Joan & Kemps, Rachel. 2004. Incomplete neutralization and other sub-phonemic durational differences in production and perception: Evidence from Dutch. Journal of Phonetics 32, 251–276.Google Scholar
Whalen, Douglas H. & Levitt, Andrea G.. 1995. The universality of intrinsic f0 of vowels. Journal of Phonetics 23(3), 349–366.10.1016/S0095-4470(95)80165-0CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wightman, Colin W., Shattuck-Hufnagel, Stefanie, Ostendorf, Mari & Price, Patti J.. 1992. Segmental durations in the vicinity of prosodic phrase boundaries. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 91, 1707–1717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed