Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:38:03.039Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Vowel categories and allophonic lowering among Bolivian Quechua–Spanish bilinguals

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 November 2017

Nicole Holliday
Affiliation:
Sean Martin
Affiliation:

Abstract

This paper is an acoustic study describing the vowel spaces of bilingual Quechua–Spanish speakers in Cochabamba, Bolivia, with a particular focus on the height of mid and high vowels, in order to explore longstanding questions about the nature of Quechua vowel categories. South Bolivian Quechua is generally described as phonemically trivocalic with high-vowel lowering in presence of uvular consonants, but there has been little acoustic study of vowel formant characteristics (Cerrón-Palomino 1987, Laime Ajacopa, Cazazola & Pairumani 2007). The current study quantifies previous impressionistic observations of the vowel system and describes the acoustic properties of the Quechua vowels. Eleven bilingual speakers of South Bolivian Quechua and Spanish were recorded in a Quechua translation task and a Spanish list-reading task. Results of Bayesian models indicate that Quechua high vowels do appear to undergo systematic lowering following uvular consonants, supporting earlier descriptions. The results also demonstrate that lowering is consistent throughout the duration of the vowels, challenging a purely coarticulatory motivation for the observed lowering pattern. The allophonic mid-vowels of Quechua and the phonemic high and mid vowels of Spanish also have formant characteristics that may differ from one another, providing evidence for the hypothesis that these bilingual speakers could potentially command two separate vowel systems with different bases of articulation. These findings are also relevant for questions related to the nature of three-vowel systems, and whether or not they may contain true mid-vowel allophones.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adelaar, Willem. 2004. The languages of the Andes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bills, Garland, Troike, Rudolph C. & Vallejo, Bernardo. 1969. An introduction to spoken Bolivian Quechua. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2014. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer (version 5.3.62). http://www.praat.org/ (accessed 2 January 2014). [Computer program]Google Scholar
Bradlow, Ann R. 1995. A comparative acoustic study of English and Spanish vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 97 (3), 19161924.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1987. Lingüística quechua, vol. 8. Centro de Estudios Rurales Andinos ‘Bartolomé de las Casas’.Google Scholar
Cerrón-Palomino, Rodolfo. 1994. Quechua sureño. Diccionario unificado. Quechua–castellano, castellano–quechua. Biblioteca Nacional del Perú 14, 117.Google Scholar
Cusihuamán, Antonio. 1976. Diccionario Quechua: Cuzco-Collao. Lima: Ministerio de Educación and Instituto de Estudios Peruanos.Google Scholar
Disner, Sandra Ferrari. 1983. Vowel quality: The relation between universal and language-specific factors (UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 58). Los Angeles, CA: University of California, Los Angeles. [Ph.D. dissertation, UCLA]Google Scholar
Flege, James Emil. 1995. Second-language speech learning: Theory, findings and problems. In Strange, Winifred (ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research, 233273. York: Timonium.Google Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian. 2013. Speaker awareness of non-local ejective phonotactics in Cochabamba Quechua. Natural Language & Linguistic Theory 31 (4), 10671099.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallagher, Gillian. 2016. Vowel height allophony and dorsal place contrasts in Cochabamba Quechua. Phonetica 73, 101119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gordon, Raymond G. Jr. (ed.). 2005. Ethnologue: Languages of the world, 15th edn. Dallas, TX: SIL International.Google Scholar
Guion, Susan G. 2003. The vowel systems of Quichua–Spanish bilinguals. Phonetica 60 (2), 98128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hintz, Diane M. 2006. Stress in South Conchucos Quechua: A phonetic and phonological study. International Journal of American Linguistics 72 (4), 477521.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hornberger, Nancy H. & King, Kendall A.. 1998. Authenticity and unification in Quechua language planning. Language Culture and Curriculum 11 (3), 390410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jongman, A., Fourakis, Marios & Sereno, Joan A.. 1989. The acoustic vowel space of Modern Greek and German. Language and Speech 32 (3), 221248.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kruschke, John K. 2015. Doing Bayesian data analysis: A tutorial with R, JAGS, and Stan. Burlington, MA.Google Scholar
Ajacopa, Laime, Cazazola, Teofila Efraín & Pairumani, Félix Layme. 2007. Diccionario Bilingüe, Iskay Simipi Yuyayk'ancha: Quechua–Castellano Castellano–Quechua. La Paz, Bolivia.Google Scholar
Lindau, Mona & Wood, Patricia. 1977. Acoustic vowel spaces. UCLA Working Papers in Phonology 38, 4148.Google Scholar
Lipski, John M. 1994. Latin American Spanish. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Parker, Steve & Quintero, Deber. 2007. Un análisis acústico del quechua del Cusco (GIALens: Electronic Notes Series 1.3).Google Scholar
Reyburn, William D. 1954. Quechua I: Phonemics. International Journal of American Linguistics 20 (3), 210214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rischel, Jørgen. 1974. Topics in West Greenlandic phonology. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar
Stan Development Team. 2017. RStan: The R interface to Stan. R package version 2.16.2. http://mc-stan.org.Google Scholar
Taff, Alice, Rozelle, Lorna, Cho, Taehong, Ladefoged, Peter, Dirks, Moses & Wegelin, Jacob. 2001. Phonetic structures of Aleut. Journal of Phonetics 29 (3), 231271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Ian. 2007. The effects of post-velar consonants on vowels in Nuu-chah-nulth: Auditory, acoustic, and articulatory evidence. The Canadian Journal of Linguistics/La revue canadienne de linguistique 52 (1), 4370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar