Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T01:12:49.792Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Visualizing phonetic segment frequencies with density-equalizing maps

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  14 March 2017

Jeff Mielke
Jeff Mielke*
Affiliation:
Department of English, North Carolina State [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A method is demonstrated for creating density-equalizing maps of IPA consonant and vowel charts, where the size of a cell in the chart reflects information such as the crosslinguistic frequency of the consonant or vowel. Transforming the IPA charts in such a way allows the visualization of interactions between phonetic features. Density-equalizing maps are used to illustrate a range of facts about consonant and vowel inventories, including the frequency of consonants and vowels and the frequency of common diacritics, and to illustrate the frequency of deletion and epenthesis involving particular consonants and vowels. Solutions are proposed for issues involving genealogical sampling, counting pairs of very similar phones, and counting diacritics in relation to basic symbols.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , August 2018 , pp. 129 - 154
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Appel, A., Evangelisti, C. & Stein, A.. 1983. Animating quantitative maps with cellular automata. IBM Technical Discovery Bulletin 26, 953–956.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar. 2008. A refined sampling procedure for genealogical control. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 61, 221–233.Google Scholar
Bickel, Balthasar & Nichols, Johanna. 1996. The AUTOTYP database. http://www.autotyp.uzh.ch/ (accessed 15 June 2009).Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2005. The typology of geminate inventories: Historical explanations for recurrent sound patterns. Seoul Linguistics Forum 2005, 121–137. Seoul: Language Education Institute, Seoul National University.Google Scholar
Blevins, Juliette. 2008. Consonant epenthesis: Natural and unnatural histories. In Good, Jeff (ed.), Proceedings of the Workshop on Explaining Linguistic Universals, 79–107. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Browman, Catherine & Goldstein, Louis. 1992. Articulatory phonology: An overview. Phonetica 49, 155–180.Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1977. Fundamental problems in phonetics, vol. 1. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Chanard, Christian. 2006. Systèmes alphabétiques des langues africaines. http://sumale.vjf.cnrs.fr/phono/ (accessed 4 February 2017).Google Scholar
Chiu, Chenhao & Gick, Bryan. 2013. Producing whole speech events: Anticipatory lip compression in bilabial stops. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, vol. 19, 060252.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 2003. Feature economy in sound systems. Phonology 20 (3), 287–333.Google Scholar
Clements, G. N. 2009. The role of features in speech sound inventories. In Raimy, Eric & Cairns, Charles (eds.), Architecture and representations in phonological theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Crothers, John H., Lorentz, James P., Sherman, Donald A. & Vihman, Marilyn M.. 1979. Handbook of phonological data from a sample of the world's languages (A report of the Stanford Phonology Archive). Stanford, CA: Stanford University.Google Scholar
de Boer, Bart. 2001. The origins of vowel systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Dorling, Daniel, Newman, Mark & Barford, Anna. 2008. The atlas of the real world: Mapping the way we live. London: Thames & Hudson.Google Scholar
Dorling, Danny [Daniel], Barford, Anna & Newman, Mark. 2006. Worldmapper: The world as you've never seen it before. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics 12, 757–764.Google Scholar
Dougenik, James A., Chrisman, Nicholas R. & Niemeyer, Duane R.. 1985. An algorithm to construct continuous area cartograms. Professional Geographer 37, 75–81.Google Scholar
Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.). 2013. The world atlas of language structures online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://wals.info (accessed 19 February 2017).Google Scholar
Flemming, Edward S. 2002. Auditory representations in phonology. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Gastner, Michael T. & Newman, M. E. J. [Mark]. 2004. Diffusion-based method for producing density equalizing maps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 101, 7499–7504.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Stavness, Ian & Chiu, Chenhao. 2013. Coarticulation in a whole event model of speech production. Proceedings of Meetings on Acoustics, vol. 19, 060207.Google Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Stavness, Ian, Chiu, Chenhao & Fels, Sidney. 2011. Categorical variation in lip posture is determined by quantal biomechanical–articulatory relations. Canadian Acoustics 39, 178–179.Google Scholar
Gusein-Zade, Sabir M. & Tikunov, Vladimir S.. 1993. A new technique for constructing continuous cartograms. Cartography and Geographic Information Systems 20, 167–173.Google Scholar
Hall, Daniel Currie. 2011. Phonological contrast and its phonetic enhancement: Dispersedness without dispersion. Phonology 28, 1–54.Google Scholar
Halle, Morris & Clements, G. N.. 1983. Problem book in phonology. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Hammarström, Harald, Forkel, Robert, Haspelmath, Martin & Bank, Sebastian. 2015. Glottolog 2.6. Jena: Max Planck Institute for the Science of Human History. http://glottolog.org (accessed 5 October 2015).Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. & Roach, Peter J.. 1979. An instrumental investigation of coarticulation in stop consonant sequences. In Hollien, Harry & Hollien, Patricia (eds.), Current issues in the phonetic sciences, vol. 15, 531–540. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Hartell, Rhonda L. (ed.). 1993. Alphabets des langues africaines. UNESCO and Société Internationale de Linguistique.Google Scholar
Hume, Elizabeth & Bromberg, Ilana. 2005. Predicting epenthesis: An information-theoretic account. Presented at the 7th Annual Meeting of the French Network of Phonology.Google Scholar
Kawasaki, Haruko. 1982. An acoustical basis for universal phonotactic constraints. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
Keating, Patricia [A.]. 1984. Physiological effects on stop consonant voicing. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 59, 29–34.Google Scholar
Kocmoud, Christopher James. 1997. Constructing continuous cartograms: A constraint-based approach. Master's thesis, Texas A&M University.Google Scholar
Liljencrants, Johan & Lindblom, Bjöorn. 1972. Numerical simulation of vowel quality systems: The role of perceptual contrast. Language 48, 839–862.Google Scholar
Lindblom, Björn & Maddieson, Ian. 1988. Phonetic universals in consonant systems. In Hyman, Larry M. & Li, Charles N. (eds.), Language, speech, and mind: Studies in honour of Victoria Fromkin, 62–78. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Mackie, Scott & Mielke, Jeff. 2011. Feature economy in natural, random, and synthetic inventories. In Clements, G. N. & Ridouane, Rachid (eds.), Where do phonological contrasts come from?, 43–68. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1984. Patterns of sounds. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1997. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & Laver, John (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 619–639. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2001. Typological patterns – geographical distribution and phonetic explanation. Presented at the Conference on the Phonetics–Phonology Interface, Berlin.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2014. LAPSyD: Lyon–Albuquerque Phonological Systems Database. Lyon: CNRS. http://www.lapsyd.ddl.ish-lyon.cnrs.fr/lapsyd/ (accessed 4 February 2017).Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian & Precoda, Kristin. 1990. Updating UPSID. UCLA Working Papers in Phonetics 74, 104–111.Google Scholar
Michael, Lev, Stark, Tammy & Chang, Will. 2012. South American Phonological Inventory Database. http://linguistics.berkeley.edu/~saphon/en/ (accessed 4 February 2017).Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2008. The emergence of distinctive features (Oxford Studies in Typology and Linguistic Theory). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff. 2009. Segment inventories. Blackwell Language and Linguistics Compass 32, 700–718.Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff & Brohan, Anthony. 2013. P-base 3. http://pbase.phon.chass.ncsu.edu. [Electronic database]Google Scholar
Mielke, Jeff, Magloughlin, Lyra & Hume, Elizabeth. 2011. Evaluating the effectiveness of Unified Feature Theory and three other feature systems. In Goldsmith, John, Hume, Elizabeth & Wetzels, Leo (eds.), Tones and features: In honor of G. Nick Clements, 223–263. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Moran, Steven. 2012. Phonetics information base and lexicon. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Washington.Google Scholar
Moran, Steven, McCloy, Daniel & Wright, Richard. 2014. Phoible online. Leipzig: Max Planck Institute for Evolutionary Anthropology. http://phoible.org (accessed 3 October 2015).Google Scholar
Newman, Mark. 2006. Cart: Computer software for making cartograms. http://www-personal.umich.edu/~mejn/cart/doc/ (accessed 17 September 2011). [Online documentation]Google Scholar
Ohala, John J. 1983. The origin of sound patterns in vocal tract constraints. In MacNeilage, Peter F. (ed.), The production of speech, 189–216. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet & Talkin, David. 1992. Lenition of /h/ and glottal stop. In Docherty, Gerard J. & Ladd, D. Robert (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology II: Gesture, segment, prosody, 90–117. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
R Core Team. 2015. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing., https://www.R-project.org (accessed 4 February 2017).Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 1999. Fundamental problems in comparative phonetics and phonology: Does UPSID help to solve them? 14th International Congress of the Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIV), San Francisco, 349–352.Google Scholar
Steriade, Donca. 2001. Directional asymmetries in place assimilation: A perceptual account. In Hume, Elizabeth & Johnson, Keith (eds.), Perception in phonology, 219–250. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth. 1972. The quantal nature of speech: Evidence from articulatory-acoustic data. In David, Edward E. & Denes, Peter B. (eds.), Human communication: A unified view, 51–66. New York: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
Stevens, Kenneth. 1989. On the quantal nature of speech. Journal of Phonetics 17, 3–45.Google Scholar
Tobler, Waldo R. 1963. Geographic area and map projections. Geographical Review 53, 59–78.Google Scholar
Tobler, Waldo R. 1973. A continuous transformation useful for districting. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 219, 215–220.Google Scholar
Vaux, Bert. 2002. Consonant epenthesis and the problem of unnatural phonology. Presented at Yale University Linguistics Colloquium.Google Scholar
Westbury, John R. & Keating, Patricia A.. 1986. On the naturalness of stop consonant voicing. Journal of Linguistics 22, 145–166.Google Scholar
Winter, Mark J. 2011. Diffusion cartograms for the display of periodic table data. Journal of Chemical Education 88, 1507–1510.Google Scholar
Zuraw, Kie. 2011. Marginal contrasts in Tongan loanword phonology. Colloquium talk, University of Ottawa.Google Scholar