Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T23:16:33.707Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Towards intonation models and typologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Joan Rahilly
Joan Rahilly
Affiliation:
School of English, Queen's University, Belfast BT7 1NN, Northern Ireland, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many existing intonation studies tend to be unenlightening for three main reasons. First, they do not acknowledge that intonational variation may be functionally significant. By effectively ignoring functional variation among accents, investigators therefore run the risk of missing explanations for variation which may be theoretically important. The question of degree of perceptual relevance in intonational variation is not considered in detail here, although the basic assumption is that intonation is capable of performing a range of roles. Second, few studies attempt to provide a detailed explanation of the model they have used for analysing intonation. This means that there is no way of knowing whether, for instance, nuclearity in one accent is realised in identical ways in other accents, or even whether the concept of nuclearity is applicable in other varieties. Finally, existing accounts offer little information which is useful for developing intonational typologies. Clearly, this is a consequence of the failure to recognise variation and to provide an agreed analytic model. The present article addresses the shortcomings mentioned above and points towards a means of overcoming them by highlighting the need for a systematic phonological approach to intonation analysis.

Type
Research Notes
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 28 , Issue 1-2 , June 1998 , pp. 73 - 82
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1998

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1990). RP today: Its positions and prospects. In Abercrombie, D. Fifty Years in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. 48–53.Google Scholar
Ainsworth, W.A., & Lindsay, D. (1986). “Perception of pitch movement on tonic syllables in British English.” Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 79, 2, 472–480.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Altenberg, B. (1987). Prosodic Patterns in Spoken English: Studies in the Correlation between Prosody and Grammar for Text to Speech Conversion. Lund University Press.Google Scholar
Bauer, L. (1985). Tracing phonetic change in the Received Pronunciation of British English. Journal of Phonetics 13, 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradlow, A.R., Torretta, G., & Pisoni, D.B. (1996). Intelligibility of normal speech I: Global and fine-grained acoustic-phonetic talker characteristics. Speech Communication 20, 255–272.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brown, G., Currie, K.L., & Kenworthy, J. (1980). Questions of Intonation. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1994). Rises in English. In Windsor-Lewis, J. (editor), Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O'Connor, 155–173. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Cruttenden, A. (1997). Intonation. Second edition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crystal, D. (1969). Prosodic Systems and Intonation in English Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Crystal, D. (1975). The English Tone of Voice. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Currie, K.L. (1979). Intonation systems in Scottish English. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Edinburgh.Google Scholar
Cutler, A. (1980). Errors of stress and intonation. In Fromkin, A. (editor), Errors in Linguistic Performance – Slips of the Tongue, Ear, Pen and Hand. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Davison, B.D.(1977). Aspects of information structuring in modern spoken English. In Ball, W.D., & Ilson, R. (editors) Studies in English Usage: The Resources of a Present Day English Corpus for Linguistic Analysis, 157–170. Frankfurt: Forum Linguisticum.Google Scholar
Eady, S.J., & Cooper, W.E. (1986). Speech intonation and focus location on matched statements and questions. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 80, 402–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Esser, J., & Polomski, A. (1987). Reading intonation. Language and Communication 7, 59–75CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esser, J. and Polomski, A. (1988). Comparing Reading and Speaking Intonation Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, A. (1994). Principles of intonational typology. In Windsor-Lewis, J. (editor), Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O'Connor, 187–210. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Halliday, M.A.K. (1970). A course in Spoken English: Intonation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Henton, C. (1995). Pitch dynamism in female and male speech. Language and Communication 15, 43–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hirson, A., French, P., & Howard, D. (1994). Speech fundamental frequency over the telephone and face-to-face: some implications for forensic phonetics. In Windsor-Lewis, J. (editor), Studies in General and English Phonetics: Essays in Honour of Professor J.D. O'Connor, 230–240. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Jarman, E., & Cruttenden, A. (1976). Belfast intonation and the myth of the fall. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 6, 4–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kingdon, R. (1958). The Groundwork of English Intonation. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. (1974). Scouse: The urban dialect of Liverpool. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, University of Leeds.Google Scholar
Knowles, G. (1987). Patterns of Spoken English. London: Longman.Google Scholar
Ladd, D.R. (1986). Intonational phrasing - the case for recursive prosodic structure. Phonology Yearbook 3, 311–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ladd, D.R. (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P. (1967). Intonation, Perception and Language. Research Monograph 38. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Lindstrom, O. (1978). Aspects of English Intonation. Gothenburg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis.Google Scholar
Local, J.K. (1986). Patterns and problems in a study of Tyneside intonation. In Johns-Lewis, C. (editor), Intonation in Discourse, 181–198. London: Croom Helm.Google Scholar
Macauley, R. (1988) RP RIP. Applied Linguistics 9, 115–124.Google Scholar
Moore, C.A., Cohn, J.F., & Katz, G.S. (1994). Quantitative description and differentiation of fundamental frequency contours. Computer Speech and Language 8, 385–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Connor, J.D., & Arnold, G.F. (1973). Intonation of Colloquial English. London: Longman. 2nd edition.Google Scholar
Pellowe, V., & Jones, V. (1978). On intonational variability in Tyneside speech. In Trudgill, P. (editor), Sociolinguistic Patterns in British English, 101–112. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, J.B. (1980). The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Unpublished Ph.D. Thesis, MIT.Google Scholar
Quirk, R., Duckworth, A.P., Svartvik, J., Rusiecki, J.P.L., & Colin, A.J.T. (1964). Studies in the correspondence of prosodic to grammatical features in English. In Proceedings of the 9th International Congress of Linguists, 679–691. The Hague: Mouton.Google Scholar
Rahilly, J. (1997). Aspects of prosody in Hiberno-English: The case of Belfast. In Kallen, J. (editor) Focus on Ireland, 109–132. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosen, S.M., Fourcin, A.J., & Moore, B.C.J. (1981). Voice pitch as an aid to lipreading. Nature 5811, 150–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rump, H.H., & Collier, R. (1996). Focus conditions and the prominence of pitch-accented syllables. Language and Speech 39, 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schuetze-Coburn, S., Shapley, M., & Weber, E.G. (1991). Units of intonation in discourse: A comparison of acoustic and auditory analyses. Language and Speech 34, 207–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shute, B. and Wheldall, K. (1995). The incidence of raised average pitch and increased pitch variability in British ‘motherese’ speech and the influence of maternal occupation and discourse form. First Language 15, 35–55.Google Scholar
Tench, P. (1996). The Intonation Systems of English. London: Cassell.Google Scholar
Terken, J. (1991). Fundamental frequency and perceived prominence of accented syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89, 1768–1776.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Trager, G.L., & Smith, H.L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Washington: American Council of Learned Societies.Google Scholar
Wichmann, A. (1987). Stylistic variation in prosody: A preliminary study of the Spoken English.Corpus Unpublished M.A. Thesis, University of Lancaster.Google Scholar
Wingfield, A. (1975). The intonation syntax interaction: Prosodic features in perceptual processing of sentences. In Cohen, A., & Nooteboom, S.G. (editors), Structure and Process in Speech Perception, 144–156. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Yule, G. (1979). The function of phonological focus in Edinburgh English. Paper no. 8, in Intonation of Scottish English. SSRC Report, HR3601.Google Scholar