Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T15:40:55.144Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some aspects of Arabic duration

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Fares Mitleb
Fares Mitleb
Affiliation:
Department of English, Yarmouk University, Irbid, Jordan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The study of the temporal organization of spoken language has developed greatly over the past three decades. Segment based analyses, such as that of Chomsky & Halle (1968) looked at temporal patterns and other physical properties of speech as being “supplied by universal rules.” However, several researchers have published experimental evidence which indicates that temporal differences do exist between languages and have to be learned (Lehiste 1970, 1984, 1987, Port, Al-Ani & Maeda 1980, Keating 1979, Flege 1979, Flege & Port 1981, Mitleb 1984a, 1984b).

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 22 , Issue 1-2 , June 1992 , pp. 27 - 34
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Ani, S. (1970). Arabic Phonology: An Acoustical and Physiological Investigation. The Hague: Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chomsky, N and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
El-Yasin, M. (1988). ‘Long’ vs. ‘short’ sibilants in Jordanian Arabic. Abhath Al-Yarmouk, Literature and Linguistics Series 6:2, 25–39.Google Scholar
Flege, J. (1979). Phonetic Interference in Second Language Acquisition. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Bloomington, IN: Department of Linguistics, Indiana University.Google Scholar
Flege, J. and Port, R. (1981). Cross-language phonetic interference: Arabic to English. Language and Speech 24, 152–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keating, P. (1979). A Phonetic Study of a Voicing Contrast in Polish. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation. Providence, RI: Department of Linguistics, Brown University.Google Scholar
Klatt, D. (1976). The linguistic uses of segmental duration in English: Acoustic and perceptual evidence. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 59, 1208–21.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kohler, K. (1979). Dimensions in the perception of fortis and lenis plosives. Phonetica 36, 323–43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lehiste, I. (1970). Suprasegmentals. Cambridge, MA: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1984). The many linguistic functions of duration. In Copeland, J. E. (editor), New Directions in Linguistics and Semiotics, 96–122. Houston: Rice University.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lehiste, I. (1987). Duration: measurements, phonological functions, theoretical implications. Proceedings of the 11th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Tallinn: Estonian Academy of Sciences 4, 9–15.Google Scholar
Mitleb, F. (1984a). Voicing effect on vowel duration is not an absolute universal. Journal of Phonetics 12, 23–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitleb, F. (1984b). Vowel length contrast in Arabic and English: A spectrographic test. Journal of Phonetics 12, 229–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitleb, F. (ms). Arabic gemination: A spectrographic analysis.Google Scholar
Port, R. (1979). The influence of tempo on stop closure duration as a cue for voicing and place. Journal of Phonetics 7, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, R. (1981). On the structure of the phonetic space with special reference to speech timing. Lingua 55, 181–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Port, R., Al-Ani, S. and Maeda, S. (1980). Temporal compensation and universal phonetics. Phonetica 37, 235–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar