Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:56:09.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Revisions to the extIPA chart

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 April 2017

Martin J. Ball ,
Sara J. Howard  and
Kirk Miller
Martin J. Ball
Affiliation:
Linköping University, [email protected]
Sara J. Howard
Affiliation:
University of Sheffield, [email protected]
Kirk Miller
Affiliation:
Independent researcher [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper describes changes to the extIPA (Extensions to the IPA) symbol set, the motivation for these changes, and areas where future changes by the IPA might be helpful to clinical transcribers. The extIPA symbol set was introduced some twenty-five years ago. Since that time, some minor changes have been introduced to the extIPA chart but no major rearrangement has been attempted. The 2010 Oslo meeting of ICPLA (International Clinical Phonetics and Linguistics Association) started a revision of the extIPA chart, and this process was recently completed. A revised extIPA chart was approved at the 2016 ICPLA meeting. The revision involved the addition, modification and removal of categories and symbols. All changes derive from the need to denote sounds encountered in disordered speech that were not covered by the original chart.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 48 , Issue 2 , August 2018 , pp. 155 - 164
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Craig Dickson, B.. 1995. The VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 25, 61–70.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Craig Dickson, B.. 2000. Transcription of voice. In Kent, Raymond D. & Ball, Martin J. (eds.), Voice quality measurement, 49–58. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Esling, John H. & Craig Dickson, B.. Revisions to the VoQS system for the transcription of voice quality. Journal of the International Phonetic Association, doi:10.1017/S0025100317000159. Published online by Cambridge University Press, 13 April 2017.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Harding-Bell, Anne, Howard, Sara J., Heselwood, Barry, Lohmander, Anette, Sell, Debbie & Trost-Cardamone, Judith. 2010. Panel on the transcription of cleft palate speech, presented at the 13th ICPLA conference, Oslo.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Howard, Sara J., Elsing, John H. & Craig Dickson, B., 2016. Revisions to the extIPA and VoQS symbol sets. Poster presented at the 16th ICPLA conference, Halifax, Nova Scotia.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Manuel, Rachel & Müller, Nicole. 2004. Deapicalization and velodorsal articulation as learned behaviors: A videofluorographic study. Child Language Teaching and Therapy 20, 153–162.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Müller, Nicole. 2005. Phonetics for communication disorders. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J. & Rahilly, Joan. 2011. The symbolization of central approximants in the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41, 231–237.Google Scholar
Ball, Martin J., Rahilly, Joan & Lowry, Orla. 2017. Phonetics for speech pathology, 3rd edn. Ms., Linköping University. [To be published by Equinox (Sheffield).]Google Scholar
Bernhardt, Barbara & Ball, Martin J.. 1993. Characteristics of atypical speech currently not included in the Extensions to the IPA. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 23, 35–38.Google Scholar
Duckworth, Martin, Allen, George, Hardcastle, William & Ball, Martin J.. 1990. Extensions to the International Phonetic Alphabet for the transcription of atypical speech. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 4, 273–280.Google Scholar
Foulkes, Paul & Docherty, Gerard. 2000. Another chapter in the story of /r/: ‘Labiodental’ variants in British English. Journal of Sociolinguistics 4, 30–59.Google Scholar
Grenoble, Lenore. 2014. Verbal gestures: Toward a field-based approach to language description. In Plungian, Vladimir, Daniel, Michael, Fedorova, Olga, Lyutikova, Ekaterina & Tatevoso, Sergei (eds.), Language – Constants – Variables: In memory of A. E. Kibrik, 105–118. Saint Petersburg: Aleteija.Google Scholar
Heselwood, Barry. 2013. Phonetic transcription in theory and practice. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lionnet, Florian. 2017. Paralinguistic use of clicks in Chad. Ms., University of California, Berkeley. [To appear in Bonny Sands (ed.), The handbook of click languages. Leiden: Brill.]Google Scholar
Martínez-Celdrán, Eugenio. 2004. Problems in the classification of approximants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34, 201–210.Google Scholar
PRDS. 1980. Progress report. British Journal of Disorders of Communication 15, 215–220.Google Scholar
PRDS. 1983. The phonetic representation of disordered speech. King's Fund Project Paper 38. London: The King's Fund.Google Scholar