Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:00:33.817Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Place of articulation of anterior nasal versus oral stops in Croatian

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 March 2015

Marko Liker  and
Fiona E. Gibbon
Marko Liker
Affiliation:
Faculty of Humanities and Social Sciences, University of Zagreb, Croatia [email protected]
Fiona E. Gibbon
Affiliation:
University College Cork, Ireland [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The purpose of this investigation is to analyse the place of articulation of anterior nasal versus oral stops in Croatian. Although there is agreement that placement for /n/ and /td/ is in the anterior region, there is disagreement among different authors about the precise place of articulation for these sounds. Some authors view these targets as sharing identical placement while others view placement of /n/ as more posterior to /td/. In this paper we use electropalatography (EPG) to investigate whether placement for these sounds is the same or different. The speech of six participants was recorded for the purposes of this study. The speech material consisted of 972 VCV sequences (V = /iau/, C = /ntd/). Four EPG indices were analysed: the ACoG measure, the amount of contact at dental and alveolar articulatory zones (dentoalveolar articulation being inferred indirectly), incomplete EPG closures and the lateral contact measure. Coarticulatory effects of vowels on placement were also measured. The results showed that /ntd/ generally shared the place of articulation in the dentoalveolar region, but also that relating quantitative physiological data to specific places of articulation should be done cautiously, taking into account variability in individual productions. The analyses also showed that /n/ had more incomplete EPG closures and a significantly lower amount of lateral contact when compared with /t/ and /d/. The nasal was more variable and showed less coarticulatory resistance in different vowel contexts than /t/ and /d/. The results of this study are discussed in terms of existing descriptions of Croatian consonant system and in light of cross-linguistic findings.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 45 , Issue 1 , April 2015 , pp. 35 - 54
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakran, Juraj. 1996. Zvučna slika hrvatskoga govora [Croatian visible speech]. Zagreb: Ibis grafika.Google Scholar
Barić, Eugenija, Lončarić, Mijo, Malić, Dragica, Pavešić, Slavko, Peti, Mirko, Zečević, Vesna & Znika, Marija. 2005. Hrvatska gramatika [Croatian grammar]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Bladon, Anthony & Nolan, Francis. 1977. A video-fluorographic investigation of tip and blade alveolars in English. Journal of Phonetics 5, 185–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brozović, Dalibor. 1991. Fonologija hrvatskoga književnog jezika [Phonology of Standard Croatian]. In Katičić (ed.), 381–452.Google Scholar
Celata, Chiara & Calamai, Silvia (eds.). 2012. Articulatory techniques for sociophonetic research: Special issue of Italian Journal of Linguistics 24(1).Google Scholar
Chafcouloff, Michel & Marchal, Alain. 1999. Velopharyngeal coarticulation. In Hardcastle & Hewlett (eds.), 69–79.Google Scholar
Cheng, Hei-Yan, Murdoch, Bruce E., Goozee, Justine V. & Scott, Dion. 2007. Electropalatographic assess-ment of tongue-to-palate contact patterns and variability in children, adolescents, and adults. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 50, 375–392.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Colantoni, Laura & Kochetov, Alexei. 2012. Nasal variability and speech style: An EPG study of word-final nasals in two Spanish dialects. In Celata & Calamai (eds.), 11–42.Google Scholar
Dart, Sarah N. 1998. Comparing French and English coronal consonant articulation. Journal of Phonetics 26, 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dixit, Rahul P. 2003. Palatometric specification of Hindi nasal, lateral, and trill consonants. In Solé et al. (eds.), 1879–1882.Google Scholar
Dixit, Rahul P. & Hoffman, Paul R.. 2004. Articulatory characteristics of fricatives and affricates in Hindi: An electropalatographic study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 34 (2), 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farnetani, Edda. 1990. V–C–V lingual coarticulation ans its spatial domain. In Hardcastle, William J. & Marchal, Alain (eds.), Speech production and speech modelling: Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute, 93–130, Dordrecht: Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fletcher Samuel, G. 1992. Articulation: A physiological approach. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne. 2005. Articulatory correlates of the voicing contrast in alveolar obstruent production in German. Ph.D. dissertation, Queen Margaret University College.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne & Perrier, Pascal. 2003. An EMMA/EPG study of voicing contrast correlates in German. In Solé et al. (eds.), 1057–1060.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona E. 2004. Abnormal patterns of tongue/palate contact in the speech of individuals with cleft palate. Clinical Linguistics and Phonetics 18, 285–312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, Fiona [E.], Hardcastle, William [J.] & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1993. Temporal and spatial aspects of lingual coarticulation in /kl/ sequences: A cross-linguistic investigation. Language and Speech 36 (2–3), 261–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona E., McNeill, Alison M., Wood, Sara E. & Watson, Jocelynne M. M.. 2003. Changes in linguapalatal contacts patterns during therapy for velar fronting in a 10-year-old with Down's syndrome. International Journal of Language and Communication Disorders 38 (1), 47–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona [E.] & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1999. Palatography. In Hardcastle & Hewlett (eds.), 229–245.Google Scholar
Gibbon, Fiona E. & Wood, Sara E.. 2003. Using electropalatography (EPG) to diagnose and treat articulation disorders associated with mild cerebral palsy: A case study. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 17 (4–5), 365–374.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gibbon, Fiona E., Yuen, Ivan, Lee, Alice & Adams, Lynne. 2007. Normal adult speakers’ tongue palate contact patterns for alveolar oral and nasal stops. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9 (1), 82–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gick, Bryan, Wilson, Ian & Derrick, Donald. 2013. Articulatory phonetics. Oxford & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. 1972. The use of electropalatography in phonetic research. Phonetica 25, 197–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hardcastle, William J. & Hewlett, Nigel (eds.). 1999. Coarticulation: Theory, data and techniques. Cambri-dge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, William J., Gibbon, Fiona [E.] & Nicolaidis, Katerina. 1991. EPG data reduction methods and their implications for studies of lingual coarticulation. Journal of Phonetics 19, 251–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jelaska, Zrinka. 2004. Fonološki opisi hrvatskoga jezika [Phonological descriptions of the Croatian language]. Zagreb: Hrvatska sveučilišna naklada.Google Scholar
Katičić, Radoslav (ed.). 1991. Povijesni pregled, glasovi i oblici hrvatskoga književnog jezika [Historical overview, sounds and types of Standard Croatian]. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus.Google Scholar
Kent, Raymond D. & Read, Charles. 2002. The acoustic analysis of speech. Albany, NY: Singular/Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1997. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford & Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Landau, Ernestina, Lončarić, Mijo, Horga, Damir & Škarić, Ivo. 1999. Croatian. In International Phonetic Association (ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association, 66–69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 2002. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Liker, Marko. 2009. Elektropalatografska metoda u opisu izgovora glasnika [Electropalatographic analysis of Croatian sounds]. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Zagreb.Google Scholar
Liker, Marko & Gibbon, Fiona E.. 2011. Groove width in Croatian voiced and voiceless postalveolar fricatives. In Lee, Wai-Sum & Zee, Eric (eds.), 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhSXVII), Hong Kong, China, 1238–1241.Google Scholar
Liker, Marko & Gibbon, Fiona [E.]. 2012. An EPG and perceptual study of the postalveolar and palatal affricate contrast in Standard Croatian. In Celata & Calamai (eds.), 43–64.Google Scholar
Liker, Marko, Horga, Damir & Mildner, Vesna. 2012. Electropalatographic specification of Croatian fricatives /s/ and /z/. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 26 (3), 199–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mair, Sheila J., Scully, Celia & Shadle, Christine H.. 1996. Distinctions between [t] and [tʃ] using electropalatography data. In Bunnel, Timothy H. & Idsardi, William (eds.), The Fourth International Conference on Language Processing, Philadelphia, vol. 3, 1597–1600.Google Scholar
McAuliffe, Megan J., Robb, Michael P. & Murdoch, Bruce E.. 2007. Acoustic and perceptual analysis of speech adaptation to an artificial palate. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 21 (11–12), 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McLeod, Sharynne. 2006. Australian adults’ production of /n/: An EPG investigation. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 20 (2–3), 99–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miletić, Branko. 1933. Izgovor srpskohrvatskih glasova: eksperimentalno-fonetska studija [The articulation of Serbo-Croatian sounds: An experimental phonetic study]. Beograd: Srpska kraljevska akademija.Google Scholar
Moen, Inger, Simonsen, Hanne Gram, Huseby, Morten & Grue, John. 2001. The relationship between intraoral air pressure and tongue/palate contact during the articulation of Norwegian /t/ and /d/. In Dalsgaard, Paul, Lindberg, Børge, Benner, Henrik & Tan, Zheng-Hua (eds.), The Seventh European Conference on Speech Communication and Technology, EUROSPEECH 2001 Scandinavia and Second INTERSPEECH Event, Aalborg, Denmark, 256–268.Google Scholar
Nicolaidis, Katerina. 2012. Consonant production in Greek Lombard speech: An electropalatographic study. In Celata & Calamai (eds.), 65–101.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel. 1985. Coarticulatory patterns and degrees of coarticulatory resistance in Catalan CV sequences. Language and Speech 28 (2), 97–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recasens, Daniel. 1999. Lingual coarticulation. In Hardcastle & Hewlett (eds.), 80–104.Google Scholar
Recasens, Daniel, Farnetani, Edda, Fontdevila, Jordi & Pallarès, Maria Dolors. 1993. An electropalatographic study of alveolar and palatal consonants in Catalan and Italian. Language and Speech 36 (2–3), 213–234.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Recasens, Daniel, Pallarès, Maria Dolors & Fontdevila, Jordi. 1997. A model of lingual coarticulation based on articulatory constraints. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 102 (1), 544–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shosted, Ryan, Hualde, José Ignacio & Scarpace, Daniel. 2012. Palatal complexity revisited: An electropalatographic analysis of /ɲ/ in Brazilian Portuguese with comparison to Peninsular Spanish. Language and Speech 55 (4), 477–502.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silić, Josip & Pranjković, Ivo. 2007. Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika: za gimnazije i visoka učilišta [Croatian grammar: For gymnasiums and university colleges]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Simonsen, Hanne Gram & Moen, Inger. 2004. On the distinction between Norwegian /ʃ/ and /ç/ from a phonetic perspective. Clinical Linguistics & Phonetics 18 (6–8), 605–620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Škarić, Ivo. 1991. Fonetika hrvatskoga književnog jezika [Phonetics of Standard Croatian]. In Katičić (ed.), 61–372.Google Scholar
Škarić, Ivo. 2007. Fonetika hrvatskoga književnoga jezika [Phonetics of Standard Croatian]. In Kovačec, August (ed.), Glasovi i oblici hrvatskoga književnog jezika [Sounds and types of Standard Croatian], 17–157. Zagreb: Nakladni zavod Globus.Google Scholar
Solé, Maria-Josep, Recasens, Daniel & Romero, Joaquin (eds.). 2003. 15th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhSXV), Barcelona.Google Scholar
Stone, Maureen. 2013. Laboratory techniques for investigating speech articulation. In Hardcastle, William J., Laver, John & Gibbon, Fiona E. (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 9–39. Oxford & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Subtelny, Joanne D., Worth, Joseph H. & Sakuda, Mamoru. 1966. Intraoral pressure and rate of flow during speech. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 9, 498–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tabain, Marija. 2011. Electropalatography data from Central Arrernte: A comparison of the new Articulate palate with the standard Reading palate. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 41 (3), 343–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Težak, Stjepko & Babić, Stjepan. 2005. Gramatika hrvatskoga jezika: priručnik za osnovno jezično obrazovanje [Croatian grammar: A handbook for elementary linguistic education]. Zagreb: Školska knjiga.Google Scholar
Westbury, John R. 1983. Enlargement of the supraglottal cavity and its relation to stop consonant voicing. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 73, 1322–1336.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wrench, Alan A. 2007. Advances in EPG palate design. Advances in Speech-Language Pathology 9 (1), 3–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wrench, Alan A. 2008. Articulate Assistant user guide, version 1.17. Musselburgh: Articulate Instruments Limited, QMU.Google Scholar
Wrench, Alan A., Gibbon, Fiona E., McNeill, Alison M. & Wood, Sara E.. 2002. An EPG therapy protocol for remediation and assessment of articulation disorders. In Hansen, John H. L. & Pellom, Brian L. (eds.), The Seventh International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, Denver, CO, 965–968.Google Scholar
Zsiga, Elisabeth C. 2013. The sounds of language: An introduction to phonetics and phonology. Oxford & Malden, MA: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar