Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-xtvcr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-14T11:59:53.788Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Phrase-final intonation adjustment in Lebanese Arabic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 April 2021

Niamh E. Kelly
Niamh E. Kelly*
Affiliation:
American University of Beirut [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Intonation languages such as English and German have been described as having, among others, ‘realizational’ differences with regard to their intonation (Ladd 1996). One such difference is whether phrase-final pitch contours that lack sufficient segmental material to be realized naturally are subjected to truncation or compression. The current investigation examines this question in Lebanese Arabic. Stimuli were created with decreasing segmental material (disyllabic phrase-final, monosyllabic phrase-final) for both statements and questions. The contours produced by 16 speakers consisted of rises (questions) and rise-falls (statements). Results indicate that reducing the segmental material induces compression in rises and truncation in rise-falls, supporting the claim that languages cannot simply be divided into compressing versus truncating languages, and that the shape of the intonational contour plays a role in accommodation strategies. Speaker variation is also discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 53 , Issue 1 , April 2023 , pp. 129 - 158
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Al-Tamimi, Jalal & Ghada, Khattab. 2018. Acoustic correlates of the voicing contrast in Lebanese Arabic singleton and geminate stops. Journal of Phonetics 71, 306–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia 2016. Analytical decisions in intonation research and the role of representations: Lessons from Romani. Laboratory Phonology 7(1), 1–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Gina, Garding. 2007. Dialectal variation in the rising accents of American English. In Jennifer, Cole & José Ignacio, Hualde (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology 9, 547–576. Berlin & New York: Mouton de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia & Robert Ladd, D.. 2009. Greek wh-questions and the phonology of intonation. Phonology 26, 43–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Robert Ladd, D. & Ineke, Mennen. 1998. Stability of tonal alignment: The case of Greek prenuclear accents. Journal of Phonetics 26, 3–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arvaniti, Amalia, Robert Ladd, D. & Ineke, Mennen. 2006. Phonetic effects of focus and ‘tonal crowding’ in intonation: Evidence from Greek polar questions. Speech Communication 48(6), 667–696.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bannert, Robert & Anne-Christine, Bredvad-Jensen. 1975. Temporal organization of Swedish tonal accent: The effect of vowel duration. Working Papers 10, 1–36. [Deptartment of Linguistics, Lund University]Google Scholar
Bannert, Robert & Anne-Christine, Bredvad-Jensen. 1977. Temporal organization of Swedish tonal accents: The effect of vowel duration in the Gotland dialect. Working Papers 15, 122–138. [Department of Linguistics, Lund University]Google Scholar
Beckman, Mary E. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B.. 1986. Intonational structure in English and Japanese. Phonology Yearbook 3, 255–310.Google Scholar
Blodgett, Allison, Jonathan, Owens & Trent, Rockwood. 2007. An initial account of the intonation of Emirati Arabic. 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XV), Saarbruecken, 1137–1140.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & David, Weenink. 2018. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 6.0.39. http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Bouchhioua, Nadia, Sam, Hellmuth & Rania, Almbark. 2019. Variation in prosodic and segmental marking of yes–no questions in Tunisian Arabic. Studies on Arabic dialectology and sociolinguistics : Proceedings of the 12th AIDA Conference. Aix Marseille University, France, 2017.Google Scholar
Bruce, Gösta 1977. Swedish word accents in sentence perspective (Travaux de L’Institut de Linguistique de Lund 12). Lund: Deptartment of Linguistics, Lund University.Google Scholar
Cangemi, Francesco, Dina El, Zarka, Simon, Wehrle, Stefan, Baumann & Martine, Grice. 2016. Speaker-specific intonational marking of narrow focus in Egyptian Arabic. In Jon, Barnes, Alejna, Brugos, Stephanie, Shattuck-Hufnagel & Nanette, Veilleux (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2016 Conference, Boston, MA, 335–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chahal, Dana. 2001. Modelling the intonation of Lebanese Arabic using the Autosegmental- Metrical Framework: A comparison with English. Ph.D. dissertation, University of Melbourne.Google Scholar
Chahal, Dana. 2007. Intonation. In Versteegh, Kees (eds.), Encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics, vol. 2, 395–401. Leiden: Brill Academic.Google Scholar
Chahal, Dana & Sam, Hellmuth. 2014. The intonation of Lebanese and Egyptian Arabic. In Sun-Ah, Jun (eds.), Prosodic typology, vol. II: The phonology of intonation and phrasing, 365–404. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth & Bushra, Adnan Zawaydeh. 1999. Stress, duration, and intonation in Arabic word-level prosody. Journal of Phonetics 27, 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jong, Kenneth & Bushra, Adnan Zawaydeh. 2002. Comparing stress, lexical focus, and segmental focus: Patterns of variation in Arabic vowel duration. Journal of Phonetics 30, 53–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DiCanio, Christian T. 2016. Pitch dynamics 5.0 (Praat script). https://www.acsu.buffalo.edu/~cdicanio/scripts.html.Google Scholar
Erikson, Y. & Alstermark, M.. 1972. Fundamental frequency correlates of the grave word accent in Swedish: The effect of vowel duration. Quarterly Progress and Status Report, Speech Transmission Lab., Stockholm 13(2–3), 52–60.Google Scholar
Frota, Sónia, Marisa, Cruz, Flaviane, Svartman, Gisela, Collischonn, Aline, Fonseca, Carolina, Serra, Pedro, Oliveira & Marina, Vigário. 2015. Intonational variation in Portuguese: European and Brazilian varieties. In Pilar, Prieto & Frota, Sónia (eds.), Intonation in Romance, 235–283. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, Matthew 2014. Disentangling stress and pitch-accent: A typology of prominence at different prosodic levels. In Harry, van der Hulst (ed.), Word stress, 83–118. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther 1998. Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics 26, 129–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grabe, Esther & Brechtje, Post. 2002. Intonational variation in the British Isles. Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2002 Conference, 343–346. Aix-en-Provence: Laboratoire Parole et Langage.Google Scholar
Grabe, Esther, Brechtje, Post, Francis, Nolan & Kimberley, Farrar. 2000. Pitch accent realization in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics 27, 161–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, Martine, Michelina, Savino, Alessandro, Caffo & Roettger, Timo B.. 2015. The tune drives the text: Schwa in consonant-final loan words in Italian. 18th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVIII), Glasgow.Google Scholar
Grønnum, Nina. 1989. Stress group patterns, sentence accents and sentence intonation in Southern Jutland (Sønderborg and Tønder). ARIPUC 23, 1–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gussenhoven, Carlos. 2000. The boundary tones are coming: On the non-peripheral realization of boundary tones. In Broe, Michael B. & Pierrehumbert, Janet B. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology V: Acquisition and the lexicon, 132–151. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hanssen, Judith, Jörg, Peters & Carlos, Gussenhoven. 2007. Alignment of the second low target in Dutch falling-rising pitch contours. Proceedings of the 8th Interspeech Conference, Antwerp, 2641–2644.Google Scholar
Hellmuth, Sam 2017. Text–tune alignment in Tunisian Arabic yes–no questions. In In Marisa, Cruz, Sónia, Frota, & Pedro, Oliveira (eds.) Prosodic variation (with)in languages: Intonation, phrasing and segments (Studies in Phonetics and Phonology). London: Equinox.Google Scholar
Hellmuth, Sam. 2006a. Focus-related pitch range manipulation (and peak alignment effects) in Egyptian Arabic. In Rüdiger, Hoffman & Hansjörg, Mixdorff (eds.), Proceedings of Speech Prosody 2006 Conference, Dresden.Google Scholar
Hellmuth, Sam. 2006b. Intonational pitch accent distribution in Egyptian Arabic. Ph.D. dissertation, School of Oriental and African Studies (SOAS), London.Google Scholar
Khattab, Ghada. 2007. A phonetic study of gemination in Lebanese Arabic. Proceedings of the 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), Saarbrücken, 153–158.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert 1996. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ladd, D. Robert 2008. Intonational phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, Scott, Elisabeth, Selkirk & Yelena, Fainleib. 2018. Phonetic implementation of high-tone spans in Luganda. Journal of the Association for Laboratory Phonology 9(1), 19: 1–22.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Oliver 2012. At the edge of intonation: The interplay of utterance-final F0 movements and voiceless fricative sounds in German. Phonetica 69(1–2), 7–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ohl, Claudia K. & Pfitzinger, Hartmut R.. 2009. Compression and truncation revisited. Proceedings of the 10th Interspeech Conference, Brighton, 2451–2454.Google Scholar
Pierrehumbert, Janet B. 1980. The phonology and phonetics of English intonation. Ph.D. dissertation, MIT.Google Scholar
Prieto, Pilar & Marta, Ortega-LlebarÍa. 2009. Do complex pitch gestures induce syllable lengthening in Catalan and Spanish? In Viga´rio, Marina, Sónia, Frota & Maria Jão, Freitas (eds.), Phonetics and phonology: Interactions and interrelations, 51–70. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prieto, Pilar, Jan, van Santen & Julia, Hirschberg. 1995. Tonal alignment patterns in Spanish. Journal of Phonetics 23, 429–451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Development Core Team. 2008. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. http://www.R-project.org.Google Scholar
Rathcke, Tamara V. 2016. How truncating are truncating languages? Evidence from Russian and German. Phonetica 73, 194–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rischel, Jørgen. 1974. Topics in West Greenlandic phonology. Copenhagen: Akademisk Forlag.Google Scholar