Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:24:20.676Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A phonological analysis of English sp, st, sk with special reference to speech error evidence

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Niels Davidsen-Nielsen
Niels Davidsen-Nielsen
Affiliation:
(University of Copenhagen)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In studies on English phonology it has often been pointed out that sp, st, sk present difficulties of interpretation. In by far the majority of these studies a bisegmental interpretation has been adopted, and the discussion has then turned on the identity of the second elements of these consonant clusters. Should the stop constituents be analysed as /p, t, k/, /b, d, g/, or /P, T, K/ (i.e. archiphonemes)? In the American structuralist school a /p, t, k/ analysis has usually been preferred on the basis of ‘ phonetic realism’ (e.g. Swadesh 1934, Pike 1947, Trager and Smith 1951), but it has subsequently been demonstrated that the stops after s are phonetically more similar to /b, d, g/ than to /p, t, k/ (Lotz et al. 1960, Reeds and Wang 1961, Davidsen-Nielsen 1969). In Praguean phonology, e.g. Trubetzkoy 1939, an archiphonemic solution has been advocated.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 5 , Issue 1 , June 1975 , pp. 3 - 25
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1975

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basbøll, H. (1973). ‘Notes on Danish consonant combinations’, Annual Report of the Institute of Phonetics, 7, University of Copenhagen, 103–143.Google Scholar
Bloomfield, L. (1933). Language. New York.Google Scholar
Boomer, D. S., and Laver, J. D. M. (1968). ‘Slips of the tongue’, Work in Progress, 1, Department of Phonetics, Edinburgh University, 44–59.Google Scholar
Borgstrøm, C. H. (1958). Innforing i Sprogvidenskap. Oslo.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York.Google Scholar
Cohen, A. (1952). The Phonemes of English. The Hague.Google Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1969). ‘English stops after initial /s/’, English Studies, 50, 321–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1974). ‘Syllabification in English words with medial sp, st, sk’, Journal of Phonetics, 2, 15–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidsen-Nielsen, N. (1975). ‘A theory of the exceptions to the Germanic and High German consonant shifts’, Acta Linguistica Hafnensia, 16, 45–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1936). ‘Alphabets and phonology in India and Burma’, Bulletin of the School of Oriental Studies, 8, 517–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Francis, W. N. (1958). The Structure of American English. New York.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1971). ‘The non-anomalous nature of anomalous utterances’, Language, 47, 27–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1972a). ‘Discussion paper on speech physiology’, Working Papers in Phonetics, 06, University of California Los Angeles, 37–60.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1972b). ‘On the reality of linguistic constructs: evidence from speech errors’, Working Papers in Phonetics, 03, University of California Los Angeles, 103–110.Google Scholar
Fromkin, V. A. (1973). ‘Slips of the tongue’, Scientific American, 229, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fudge, E. C. (1969). ‘Syllables’, Journal of Linguistics, 5, 253–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gimson, A. C. (1970). An Introduction to the Pronunciation of English. 2nd edition. London: Edward Arnold.Google Scholar
Harris, Z. S. (1951). Methods in Structural Linguistics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Hintze, F. (1950). ‘Zur Frage der monophonematischen Wertung’, Studia Linguistica, 4, 14–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hjelmslev, L. (1936), ‘On the principles of phonematics’, Proceedings of the 2nd International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. London, pp. 49–54.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1967). ‘Where the tongue slips, there slip I’, To Honor Roman Jakobson, Vol. II. The Hague, pp. 910–936.Google Scholar
Kohler, K. (1967). ‘Modern English phonology’, Lingua, 19, 145–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurath, H. (1964). A Phonology and Prosody of Modern English. Heidelberg.Google Scholar
Kurylowicz, J. (1948). ‘Contribution à la théorie de la syllabe’, Bulletin de la société polonaise de linguistique, 8, 80–114.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1967: 13th edition, revised by A. C. Gimson). An English Pronouncing Dictionary. London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1971). Preliminaries to Linguistic Phonetics. Chicago.Google Scholar
Lightner, T. M. (1963). ‘A note on the formulation of phonological rules’, Quarterly Progress Report of the Research Laboratory of Electronics, 68, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 187–189.Google Scholar
Lotz, J., Abramson, A. S., Gerstman, L. J., Ingemann, F., and Nemster, W. J. (1960). ‘The perception of English stops by speakers of English, Spanish, Hungarian, and Thai’, Language and Speech, 3, 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1939). ‘Un ou deux phonèmes?’, Acta Linguistica, 1, 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martinet, A. (1949). ‘Occlusives and affricates with reference to some problems of Romance phonology’, Word, 5, 116–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meringer, R. (1908). Aus dem Leben der Sprache. Berlin.Google Scholar
Meringer, R., and Mayer, K. (1895). Versprechen und Verlesen. Eine psychologisch-linguistische Studie. Stuttgart.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newman, P. (1968). ‘The reality of morphophonemes’, Language, 44, 507–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nordhjem, B. (1960). The Phonemes of English. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D. (1973). Phonetics. Harmondsworth: Penguin.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. D., and Trim, J. L. M. (1953). ‘Vowel, consonant and syllable; a phonological definition’, Word, 9, 103–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1947). Phonemics. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar
Pilch, H. (1964). Phonemtheorie, Vol. I. Basel.Google Scholar
Reeds, J. A., and Wang, W. S.-Y. (1961). ‘The perception of stops after s’, Phonetica, 6, 78–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schane, S. A. (1968). ‘On the non-uniqueness of phonological representations’, Language, 44, 709–716.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sigurd, B. (1965). Phonotactic Structures in Swedish. Lund.Google Scholar
Simonini, R. C. (1956). ‘Phonemic and analogic lapses in radio and television speech’, American Speech, 31, 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Söderberg, C. G. (1959). A Typological Study on the Phonetic Structure of English Words with an Instrumental-Phonetic Excursus on English Stress. Travaux de l'institut de phonétique de Lund1.Google Scholar
Spang-Hanssen, H. (1959). Probability and Structural Classification in Language Description. Copenhagen.Google Scholar
Stanley, R. (1967). ‘Redundancy rules in phonology’, Language, 43, 393–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swadesh, M. (1934). ‘The phonemic principle’, Language, 10, 117–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Togeby, K. (1951). Structure Immanente de la Langue Francaise. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Copenhague6.Google Scholar
Trager, G. L., and Bloch, B. (1941). ‘The syllabic phonemes of English’, Language, 17, 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trager, G. L., and Smith, H. L. (1951). An Outline of English Structure. Norman, Oklahoma: Studies in Linguistics.Google Scholar
Trnka, B. (1966: revised edition). A Phonological Analysis of Present-Day Standard English. Tokyo.Google Scholar
Trubetzkoy, N. S. (1939). Grundzüge der Phonologie. Travaux du Cercle linguistique de Prague7.Google Scholar
Twaddell, W. F. (1939). Review of N. S. Trubetzkoy, Grundzüge der Phonologie, in Acta Linguistica, 1, 60–63.Google Scholar
Vogt, H. (1942). ‘The structure of Norwegian monosyllables’, Norsk Tidsskrift for Sprogvidenskap, 12, 5–29.Google Scholar
Wagner, K. H. (1969). Generative Grammatical Studies in the Old English Language. Heidelberg.Google Scholar