Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T09:00:53.371Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A phonetically versatile contrast: Pulmonic and glottalic voicelessness in Scottish English obstruents and voice quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  04 November 2013

Olga B. Gordeeva  and
James M. Scobbie
Olga B. Gordeeva
Affiliation:
Acapela Group, Mons, Belgium & CASL Research Centre, Queen Margaret University, [email protected]
James M. Scobbie
Affiliation:
CASL Research Centre, Queen Margaret University, [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper presents impressionistic, electroglottographic and acoustic data exploring the distribution of glottalic and pulmonic airstream in word-final Scottish English obstruents. We explore the relationship between these airstream mechanisms and aspirated or glottalised phonatory settings of individual speakers near this obstruent locus. We address the hypothesis that the tendency for pre-stop glottalisation found in some British English varieties can explain the occurrence of glottalically-released stops. This hypothesis suggests that ejectives would appear as an occasional artefact of mistimed glottalisation. We also investigate whether a glottalic airstream acts as a potential contrast enhancement mechanism, through association with /−voice/ as opposed to /+voice/ stops. We show that glottalisation and aspiration can readily co-occur in the same speaker, and that local phonatory setting (with glottalised or aspirated articulation) can be consistently used as a secondary correlate of obstruent /−voice/, in the context of stops and fricatives respectively. The results show that although glottalisation as a secondary correlate of /−voice/ stops often co-occurs with an ejective release, they are not necessarily bound together. These results argue against a simple epiphenomenal explanation for the appearance of ejective stops in English, while also showing that they are not (yet) a systematic phonological enhancement in this variety.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 43 , Issue 3: Non-pulmonic sounds in European languages , December 2013 , pp. 249 - 271
Copyright
Copyright © International Phonetic Association 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2009. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program], Version 5.1. http://www.praat.org/ (retrieved 17 February 2009).Google Scholar
Catford, J. C. 1982. Fundamental problems in phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Chirrey, Deborah. 1999. Edinburgh: Descriptive material. In Foulkes & Docherty (eds.), 223–229.Google Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. 1992. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents (Netherlands Phonetics Archives 9). Berlin: Foris.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerard J. & Foulkes, Paul. 2005. Glottal variants of /t/ in the Tyneside variety of English. In Hardcastle & Mackenzie Beck (eds.), 173–200.Google Scholar
Esling, John H. 1978. The identification of features of voice quality in social groups. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 8, 18–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Esling, John H. & Harris, Jimmy G.. 2005. States of the glottis: An articulatory phonetic model based on laryngoscopic observations. In Hardcastle & Mackenzie Beck (eds.), 347–384.Google Scholar
Everett, Caleb. 2013. Evidence for direct geographic influences on linguistic sounds: The case of ejectives. PLoS ONE 8 (6): e65275. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0065275.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fabricius, Anne. 2000. T-glottalling: Between stigma and prestige. A sociolinguistic study of modern RP. Ph.D. dissertation, Copenhagen Business School.Google Scholar
Paul, Foulkes & Docherty, Gerard J. (eds.). 1999. Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.Google Scholar
Fourcin, Adrian. 2000. Precision stroboscopy, voice quality and electrolaryngography. In Kent, Raymond D. & Ball, Martin J. (eds.), Voice quality measurement, 285–306. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group.Google Scholar
Fuchs, Susanne, Toda, Martine & Żygis, Marzena (eds.). 2010. Turbulent sounds: An interdisciplinary guide. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordeeva, Olga B. 2007. Learnability of laryngeal abduction gesture in voiceless fricatives: Cross-linguistic evidence. In Trouvain, Jürgen & Barry, William J. (eds.), 16th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVI), Saarbrücken, 433–436.Google Scholar
Gordeeva, Olga B. & Scobbie, James M.. 2010. Preaspiration as a correlate of word-final voice in Scottish English fricatives. In Fuchs et al. (eds.), 167–208.Google Scholar
Gordeeva, Olga B. & Scobbie, James M.. 2011. Laryngeal variation in the Scottish English voice contrast: Glottalisation, ejectivisation and aspiration. In Scobbie, James M., Mennen, Ineke & Watson, Jocelynne (eds.), CASL Research Centre Working Paper, WP–19, 1–18. Edinburgh: Queen Margaret University.Google Scholar
Gordon, Matthew & Ladefoged, Peter. 2001. Phonation types: A cross-linguistic overview. Journal of Phonetics 29, 383–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grawunder, Sven, Simpson, Adrian P. & Khalilov, Madzhid. 2010. Phonetic characteristics of ejectives – samples from Caucasian languages. In Fuchs et al. (eds.), 209–244.Google Scholar
Haggard, Mark. 1978. The devoicing of voiced fricatives. Journal of Phonetics 6, 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardcastle, William J. & Beck, Janet Mackenzie (eds.). 2005. A figure of speech: A Festschrift for John Laver. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, Sarah. 2010. Phonological features, auditory objects, and illusions. Journal of Phonetics 38, 60–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hillenbrand, James, Cleveland, Ronald A. & Ericson, Robert L.. 1994. Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 37, 769–778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Honikman, Beatrice. 1964. Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie, David, Fry, D. B., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. & Trim, J. L. M. (eds.), In honour of Daniel Jones: Papers contributed on the occasion of his eightieth birthday 12 September 1961. London: Longmans, Green & Co.Google Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. & Klatt, Laura C.. 1990. Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 87 (2), 820–857.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ladefoged, Peter. 1993. A course in phonetics, 3rd edn.Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, Peter & Maddieson, Ian. 1996. The sounds of the world's languages. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Laver, John. 1994. Principles of phonetics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lindau, Mona. 1984. Phonetic differences in glottalic consonants. Journal of Phonetics 12, 147–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie Beck, Janet. 2005. Perceptual analysis of voice quality: The place of vocal profile analysis. In Hardcastle & Mackenzie Beck (eds.), 285–322.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 2011. Glottalized consonants. In Dryer, Matthew S. & Haspelmath, Martin (eds.), The world atlas of language structures online. Munich: Max Planck Digital Library.Google Scholar
Marasek, Krzysztof. 1997. Electroglottographic description of voice quality. Habilitationschift, Universität Stuttgart.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Owen. 2011. A sociophonetic study of the realization of word-final velar plosives by female pupils in a Glasgow high school. MPhil dissertation, University of Glasgow.Google Scholar
McCarthy, Owen & Stuart-Smith, Jane. 2013. Ejectives in Scottish English: A social perspective. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 43 (3), 273–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milroy, James, Milroy, Lesley, Hartley, Sue & Walshow, David. 1994. Glottal stops and Tyneside glottalization: Competing patterns of variation and change in British English. Language Variation and Change 5 (3), 327–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ogden, Richard. 2009. An introduction to English phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Roach, Peter J. 1979. Laryngeal-oral coarticulation in glottalized English plosives. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 9 (1), 2–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roberts, Sean & Winters, James. 2013. Linguistic diversity and traffic accidents: Lessons from statistical studies of cultural traits. PLoS ONE 8 (8): e70902. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0070902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scobbie, James M., Hewlett, Nigel & Turk, Alice. 1999. Standard English in Edinburgh and Glasgow: The Scottish vowel length rule revealed. In Foulkes & Docherty (eds.), 230–245.Google Scholar
Scobbie, James M., Turk, Alice & Hewlett, Nigel. 1999. Morphemes, phonetics and lexical items: The case of the Scottish vowel length rule. In Ohala, John J., Hasegawa, Yoko, Ohala, Manjari, Granville, Daniel & Bailey, Ashlee C. (eds.), 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XIV), San Francisco, 1617–1620.Google Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. 2007. Acoustic and auditory correlates of non-pulmonic sound production in German. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 37 (2), 173–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Simpson, Adrian P. In press. Ejectives in English and German – linguistic, sociophonetic, interactional, epiphenomenal? In Celata, Chiara & Calamai, Silvia (eds.), Advances in sociophonetics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Smith, Caroline L. 1997. The devoicing of /z/ in American English: Effects of local and prosodic context. Journal of Phonetics 25, 471–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stuart-Smith, Jane. 1999. Glasgow: Accent and voice quality. In Foulkes & Docherty (eds.), 203–222.Google Scholar
Vicenik, Chad. 2010. An acoustic study of Georgian stop consonants. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 40 (1), 59–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, John. 1982. Accents of English, vol. 1. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Gordeeva Supplementary Material

Gordeeva Supplementary Sound File 1

Download Gordeeva Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 119.2 KB

Gordeeva Supplementary Material

Gordeeva Supplementary Sound File 2

Download Gordeeva Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 76 KB

Gordeeva Supplementary Material

Gordeeva Supplementary Sound File 3

Download Gordeeva Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 64.8 KB

Gordeeva Supplementary Material

Gordeeva Supplementary Sound File 4

Download Gordeeva Supplementary Material(Audio)
Audio 164.8 KB