Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T02:04:06.083Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Observations on apico-labials, perception and markedness

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Dafydd Gibbon
Dafydd Gibbon
Affiliation:
(University of Göttingen)
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The aim of this paper is to show how the investigation of a borderline and apparently minor area of phonetics may help to shed light on certain indistinct areas in phonological theory.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , December 1973 , pp. 62 - 74
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Catford, J. C. (1968). ‘Articulatory possibilities of man’, in Malmberg, B. (ed.) (1968), 309–33.Google Scholar
Chomsky, N., and Halle, M. (1968). The Sound Pattern of English. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Fant, G. (1968). ‘Analysis and synthesis of speech processes’, in Malmberg, B. (ed.) (1968), 173–277.Google Scholar
Fry, D. B. (1960). ‘Linguistic theory and experimental research’, Transactions of the Philological Society, 13–39.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1955). A Manual of Phonology. International Journal of American Linguistics, 21, 6, Pt. 1 (Memoir 11); Indiana University Publications in Anthropology and Linguistics, Baltimore.Google Scholar
Hockett, C. F. (1966). ‘The problem of universals in language’, in Green-berg, J. H. (ed.), Universals of Language, 2nd edition. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1–29.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1967). The Phoneme, Its Nature and Use, 3rd edition. Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1960). ‘The value of phonetic statements’, Language, 36, 387–96.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1972). ‘Phonological features and their phonetic correlates’, JIPA, 2, 2–12.Google Scholar
Malmberg, B. (ed.) (1968). Manual of Phonetics. Amsterdam: North-Holland Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Martin, S. E. (1956). Review of Hockett (1955), Language, 32, 675–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, G. A., and Nicely, P. E. (1955). ‘An analysis of perceptual confusions among some English consonants’, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 27, 338–52. Reprint: in S. Saporta (ed.) (1961). Psycholinguistics, A Book of Readings. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston, 153–75 (used here).Google Scholar
Morris, C. (1946). Signs, Language, and Behavior. New York: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Peters, R. W. (1963). ‘Dimensions of Perception for Consonants’, J. Ac. Soc. Am., 35, 1985–9.Google Scholar
Pike, K. L. (1943). Phonetics. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
Postal, P. M. (1968). Aspects of Phonological Theory. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar