Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T05:38:23.492Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Margaret Thatcher's pronunciation: An exercise in ear-training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Luke Van Buuren
Luke Van Buuren
Affiliation:
Speech Unit, Department of English. University of Amsterdam, Spuistraat 210, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Ear training is an essential element in any phonetics or pronunciation teaching. In recent years I have been developing an ear-training method based on repeater tapes (each line repeated nine or ten times) of ‘unusual’ personalities and accents. The recordings are first transcribed by rule of thumb according to our own norm (RP English, Standard Dutch, etc.) and the idea is that the major differences from this norm are then listened to and analysed. If the observations are summarized at the end, one has a fair idea of what is characteristic of that particular type of speech. By way of illustration I shall present such a summary of 85 seconds of speech by The Rt Hon. Margaret Thatcher, the British Prime Minister, taken from an interview on Dutch television made in 1982. It will appear that we do not only analyse phonetic phenomena, but cannot help noticing in this case their semantic impact as well. Perhaps our observations may be of some interest to semanticists and psychologists as well as phoneticians.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 18 , Issue 1 , July 1988 , pp. 26 - 38
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abercrombie, D. (1967). Elements of General Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Beattie, G. W., Cutler, A., and Pearson, M. (1982). Why is Mrs Thatcher interrupted so often. Nature 300, no. 5894, 744–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Buuren, L. Van (1980). Generative phonetic rules for English (RP). English Institute Journal 3, University of Amsterdam, 3–10.Google Scholar
Buuren, L. Van (1983). Observations on phonation. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 13(1), 13–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Catford, J. C. (1977). Fundamental Problems in Phonetics. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Firth, J. R. (1948). Sounds and prosodies. Transactions of the Philological Society 1948, 127–52. Reprinted in J. R. Firth (1957), Papers in Linguistics. London: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Honikman, B. (1964). Articulatory settings. In Abercrombie, D., Fry, D. B., MacCarthy, P. A. D., Scott, N. C. and Trim, J. L. M. (editors) In Honour of Daniel Jones. London: Longman, 73–84.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1962). Outline of English Phonetics (9th edition). Cambridge: Heffer.Google Scholar
Jones, D. (1977). English Pronouncing Dictionary (14th edition, edited by Gimson, A. C.). London: Dent.Google Scholar
Ladefoged, P. (1975). A Course in Phonetics. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Local, J. K., Kelly, J., and Wells, W. H. G. (forthcoming). Towards a phonology of conversation: turn-taking in Tyneside English. To appear in Journal of Linguistics 22(2).Google Scholar
Young, H. and Sloman, A. (1986). The Thatcher Phenomenon. London: British Broadcasting Corporation.Google Scholar