Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T00:46:27.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Context effects on the acoustic realization of stops and affricates in Northern Pwo Karen

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2020

Audra Phillips  and
Benjamin V. Tucker
Audra Phillips
Affiliation:
University of Alberta & Payap [email protected]
Benjamin V. Tucker
Affiliation:
University of [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Studies have shown that the voice onset time (VOT) of alveolo-palatal affricates is the longest, followed by velars, dental/alveolars, and bilabials. In a reciprocal pattern, closure duration is the longest for bilabials, followed by dental/alveolars, and then velars. Longer VOT is also associated with high and front vowels and tones with rising components. Moreover, the VOT of voiceless unaspirated stops is reported to be longer and closure duration shorter in nasal words. Finally, the voiceless interval has been described as constant in some languages and inconstant in others. Given the evidence of previous research, this study investigates the effects of place, nasality, tone, and vowel quality on the VOT, closure duration, and voiceless interval of the voiced and voiceless obstruents of Northern Pwo Karen (N. Pwo), a language of Thailand. N. Pwo (ISO 639-3 pww) is a ‘true voicing’ language with a three-way distinction in stops, voiceless aspirated and unaspirated affricates, oral and nasal vowels, and six tones (four modal tones and two glottalized tones). In N. Pwo, the place effects on VOT and closure duration pattern reciprocally. Whereas, both VOT and the voiceless interval are longer before oral vowels compared to nasal vowels. VOT is longest before the mid tone, which has a slight rise, while it is the shortest before the falling-glottalized tone. This pattern is reversed for the closure duration of aspirates and voiced stops. Finally, VOT, closure duration, and the voiceless interval are the longest before high and front vowels.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 52 , Issue 1 , April 2022 , pp. 1 - 32
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the International Phonetic Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, Arthur S. 1989. Laryngeal control in the plosives of Standard Thai. PASAA: Notes and News About Language Teaching and Linguistics in Thailand 19, 85–93.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. 1995. Laryngeal timing in Karen obstruents. In Fredericka Bell-Berti & Raphael, Lawrence J. (eds.), Producing speech: Contemporary issues, for Katherine Safford Harris, 155–165. New York: AIP Press.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. & Lisker, Leigh. 1972. Voice timing in Korean stops. In André, Rigault & René, Charbonneau (eds.), Proceedings of the Seventh International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS VII), 439–446. The Hague & Paris: Mouton.Google Scholar
Abramson, Arthur S. & Whalen, D. H.. 2017. Voice Onset Time (VOT) at 50: Theoretical and practical issues in measuring voicing distinctions. Journal of Phonetics 63, 75–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andruski, Jean E. & Ratliff, Martha. 2000. Phonation types in production of phonological tone: The case of Green Mong. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 30(1–2), 37–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Mächler, Martin, Bolker, Benjamin M. & Walker, Steven C.. 2015. Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software 67(1), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bates, Douglas, Maechler, Martin, Bolker, Ben[jamin M.], Walker, Steven [C.], Rune Haubo Bojesen Christensen, Henrik Singmann, Bin Dai, Fabian Scheipl, Gabor Grothendieck & Peter Green. 2019. lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using “Eigen” and S4. R package version 1.1-21.Google Scholar
Boersma, Paul & Weenink, David. 2012. Praat: Doing phonetics by computer [computer program]. Version 5.3.14. http://www.praat.org/.Google Scholar
Brunelle, Marc. 2009. Tone perception in Northern and Southern Vietnamese. Journal of Phonetics 37, 79–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brunelle, Marc & Finkeldey, Joshua. 2011. Tone perception in Sgaw Karen. In Wai Sum, Lee & Eric, Zee (eds.), Proceedings of the 17th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS XVII), 372–375. Hong Kong: City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Carignan, Christopher. 2014. An acoustic and articulatory examination of the “oral” in “nasal”: The oral articulations of French nasal vowels are not arbitrary. Journal of Phonetics 46, 23–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, Kuan-Yi & Chen, Li-mei. 2008. A cross-linguistic study of voice onset time in stop consonant productions. International Journal of Computational Linguistics & Chinese Language Processing 13(2), 215–232.Google Scholar
Chao, Yuen Ren. 1967. Mandarin primer: An intensive course in spoken Chinese. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Chen, Li-mei, Chao, Kuan-Yi & Peng, Jui-Feng. 2007. VOT productions of word-initial stops in Mandarin and English: A cross-language study. In Kuang-Hua, Chen & Berlin, Chen (eds.), ROCLING 2007 poster papers, 303–317. Taipei: The Association for Computational Linguistics and Chinese Language Processing (ACLCLP).Google Scholar
Chen, Li-mei, Peng, Jui-Feng & Chao, Kuan-Yi. 2009. The effect of lexical tones on voice onset time. Proceedings 11th IEEE International Symposium on Multimedia, San Diego, CA, 552–557.Google Scholar
Cho, Taehong & Ladefoged, Peter. 1999. Variation and universals in VOT: Evidence from 18 languages. Journal of Phonetics 27(2), 207–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cooke, Joseph R., Edwin Hudspith, J. & Morris, James A.. 1976. Phlong (Pwo Karen of Hot District, Chiang Mai). In William, Smalley (ed.), Phonemes and orthography: Language planning in ten minority languages of Thailand (Pacific Linguistics C 43), 187–220. Canberra: Australian National University.Google Scholar
Davidson, Lisa. 2016. Variability in the implementation of voicing in American English obstruents. Journal of Phonetics 54, 35–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Docherty, Gerald J. 1992. The timing of voicing in British English obstruents. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duanmu, San. 1994. The phonology of the glottal stop in Garo. Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman Area 17(2), 69–82.Google Scholar
Francis, Alexander L., Valter, Ciocca, Virginia Ka Man, Wong & Ka Lam Chan, Jess. 2006. Is fundamental frequency a cue to aspiration in initial stops? The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 120(5), 2884–2895.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gick, Brian, Wilson, Ian & Derrick, Donald. 2013. Articulatory phonetics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
Higgins, Maureen B., Ronald, Netsell & Schulte, Laura. 1998. Vowel-related differences in laryngeal articulatory and phonatory function. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 41(4), 712–24.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hombert, Jean-Marie, Ohala, John J. & Ewan, William G.. 1979. Phonetic explanations for the development of tones. Language 55(1), 37–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
House, Arthur S. & Fairbanks, Grant. 1953. The influence of consonant environment upon the secondary acoustical characteristics of vowels. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25(1), 105–113.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kirby, James P. 2018. Onset pitch perturbations and the cross-linguistic implementation of voicing: Evidence from tonal and non-tonal languages. Journal of Phonetics 71, 326–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klatt, Dennis H. 1975. Voice onset time, frication, and aspiration in word-initial consonant clusters. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research 18(4), 686–706.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kuznetsova, Alexandra & Brockhoff, Per Bruun, Christensen, Rune Haubo Bojesen & Jensen, Sofie PØdenphant. 2019. lmerTest: Tests in linear mixed effects models. R package version 3.1-1. https://github.com/runehaubo/lmerTestR.Google Scholar
Lisker, Leigh & Abramson, Arthur S.. 1964. A cross-language study of voicing in initial stops: Acoustical measurements. Word 20(3), 384–422.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Hanjun, Ng, Manwa L., Wan, Mingxi, Wang, Supin & Zhang, Yi. 2008. The effect of tonal changes on voice onset time in Mandarin esophageal speech. Journal of Voice 22(2), 210–218.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Luangthongkum, Theraphan. 2010. A comparison between the speech of brass-coiled necked and non-brass-coiled necked Kayan speakers: An acoustic study. The 20th Anniversary Meeting of the Southeast Asian Linguistics Society, 10–11 June 2010, Zurich, Switzerland. http://www.arts.chula.ac.th/~ling/Karen/pages/presents-conference/2_SEALS_XX_Theraphan.pdf.Google Scholar
Maddieson, Ian. 1999. Phonetic universals. In Hardcastle, William J. & John, Laver (eds.), The handbook of phonetic sciences, 13–44. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Marasek, Krzystof. 1997. EGG & voice quality. Institute for Natural Language Processing: Experimental Phonetics. https://www2.ims.uni-stuttgart.de/EGG/ (19 June 2019).Google Scholar
Morris, Richard J., McCrea, Christopher R. & Herring, Kaileen D.. 2008. Voice onset time differences between adult males and females: Isolated syllables. Journal of Phonetics 36(2), 308–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nearey, Terrance M. & Rochet, Bernard L.. 1994. Effects of place of articulation and vowel context on VOT production and perception for French and English stops. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 24(1), 1–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, Audra. 2009. Omkoi Pwo Karen phonology and orthography. PYU Working Papers in Linguistics 5. https://inter.payap.ac.th/wp-content/uploads/linguistics_workingpapers/Omkoi_Pwo_Karen_Phonology_and_Orthography.pdf.Google Scholar
Pitt, Mark A., Keith, Johnson, Elizabeth Hume, Scott Kiesling & Raymond, William. 2005. The Buckeye corpus of conversational speech: Labeling conventions and a test of transcriber reliability. Speech Communication 45, 89–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pittayaporn, Pittayawat. 2015. Typologizing sesquisyllabicity. In Enfield, Nicholas J. & Bernard, Comrie (eds.), Languages of Mainland Southeast Asia: The state of the art (Pacific Linguistics 649), 500–528. Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
R Core Team. 2019. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.Google Scholar
Rochet, Bernard L. & Fei, Yanmei. 1991. Effect of consonant and vowel context on Mandarin Chinese VOT: Production and perception. Canadian Acoustics 19(4), 105–106.Google Scholar
Silva, Wilson. 2008. Acoustic analysis of voiceless obstruents and nasal harmony in Desano. Amerindia 32, 301–319.Google Scholar
Sun, Xiaole. 2016. Interaction between breathy tones and aspirated consonants in S’gaw Karen. In DiCanio, C., Malins, J., Good, J., Michelson, K., Jaeger, J. & Keily, H. (eds.), Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Tonal Aspects of Languages 2016, 121–124. Buffalo, NY: University at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Suomi, Kari. 1980. Voicing in English and Finnish stops: A typological comparison with an interlanguage study of the two languages in contact (Turun Yliopiston Suomalaisen Ja Yleisen Kielitieteen Laitoksen Julkaisuja 10). Turku: Department of Finnish and General Linguistics of the University of Turku.Google Scholar
Walker, Rachel. 1999. GuaranÍ voiceless stops in oral versus nasal contexts: An acoustical study. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 29(1), 63–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weismer, Gary. 1980. Control of the voicing distinction for intervocalic stops and fricatives: Some data and theoretical considerations. Journal of Phonetics 8, 427–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yao, Yao. 2007. Closure duration and VOT of word-initial voiceless plosives in English in spontaneous connected speech. UC Berkeley PhonLab Annual Report 3, 183–225.Google Scholar