Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T04:41:07.692Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Are Measured Differences Between the Formants of Men, Women and Children Due to F0 Differences?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Dieter Maurer ,
Norman Cook ,
Theodor Landis  and
Christian d'Heureuse
Dieter Maurer
Affiliation:
Neuropsychologische Abteilung, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Haldenbach D, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland
Norman Cook
Affiliation:
Neuropsychologische Abteilung, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Haldenbach D, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland
Theodor Landis
Affiliation:
Neuropsychologische Abteilung, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Haldenbach D, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland
Christian d'Heureuse
Affiliation:
Neuropsychologische Abteilung, Neurologische Klinik, Universitätsspital Zürich, Haldenbach D, CH-8091 Zürich, Switzerland
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Formant measurements show sex and age differences in the formant patterns of a single vowel category. Comparisons of the formant frequency values of men, women and children indicate low, middle and high values, respectively (Chiba & Kajiyama 1941, Potter & Steinberg 1950, Peterson & Barney 1952). The differences are found for all vowel categories, and they have generally been interpreted as a consequence of different vocal tract size.

Type
Articles
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 21 , Issue 2 , December 1991 , pp. 66 - 79
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bennett, G. and Rodet, X. (1989). Synthesis of the singing voice. In Matthews, M.V. and Pierce, R. (editors), Current Directions in Computer Music Research. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press, 19–44.Google Scholar
Bladon, A. (1982). Arguments against formants in the auditory representation of speech. In Carlson, R. and Granström, B. (editors), The Representation of Speech in the Peripheral Auditory System: New York: Elsevier Biomedical Press, 95–102.Google Scholar
Bloothooft, G. and Plomp, R. (1985). Spectral analysis of sung vowels II: The effect of fundamental frequency on vowel spectra. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 77, 1580–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chiba, T. and Kajiyama, M. (1941). The Vowel: its Nature and Structure. Tokyo: Tokyo-Kaiseikan.Google Scholar
Jorgensen, H.P. (1969). Die gespannten und ungespannten Vokale in der nord-deutschen Hochsprache mit einer spezifischen Untersuchung der Struktur der Formant-frequenzen. Phonetica 19, 217–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joos, M. (1948). Acoustic Phonetics (Language Monograph 23). Baltimore: Linguistic Society of America.Google Scholar
Klatt, D.H. (1982). Prediction of perceived phonetic distance from critical-band spectra: A first step. Proceedings of the International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 1982, 1278–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maurer, D., Landis, T. and d'Heureuse, C. (1991). Formant movement and formant number alternation with rising F0 in real vocalizations of the German vowels [u:], [o:] and [a:]. International Journal of Neuroscience 57, 25–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, R.L. (1953). Auditory tests with synthetic vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 25, 114–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterson, G.E. and Barney, H.L. (1952). Control methods used in a study of the vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 24, 175–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Potter, R.K. and Steinberg, J.C. (1950). Toward the specification of speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 22, 807–20.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1981). Perceptual dimension of openness in vowels. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69, 1465–1475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Traunmüller, H. (1985). The role of the fundamental and the higher formants in the perception of speaker size, vocal effort and vowel openness. PERILUS 4, (Institute of Linguistics, University of Stockholm) 92–102.Google Scholar
Traunmüller, H. (1988). Paralinguistic variation and invariance in the characteristic frequencies of vowels. Phonetica 45, 1–29.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wängler, H.H. (1981). Atlas der Deutschen Sprachlaute. Berlin: Akademie Verlag, 20–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar