Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-24T12:40:01.063Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

5. Individual symbols and diacritics*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  06 February 2009

Caroline G. Henton
Caroline G. Henton
Affiliation:
Linguistics Program, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616, USA
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

In preparation for the IPA Kiel Convention in 1989, this report summarizes preliminary discussions of possible improvements and changes to individual symbols and diacritics in the International Phonetic Alphabet. It details responses to a questionnaire sent out on 22 October 1988. Specific questions were suggested by a number of sources: my own paper (Henton 1987), reactions to that paper, and from discussions with other phoneticians. The questionnaire was written with a view to eliciting simple and democratic input, rather than to promoting certain symbols or suggestions over others. It was sent to 38 members of the Association who rated the section on ‘Individual symbols and diacritics’ 1–5 (on a scale of 17, with 1 being highest preference) in their reponses to the invitation to revise the International Phonetic Association's alphabet. Eighty members originally replied to the call for input to the Kiel meeting, so the 38 who placed this section high in their preferences are a good portion (47%) of members actively concerned with this Convention.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Phonetic Association , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , December 1988 , pp. 85 - 94
Copyright
Copyright © Journal of the International Phonetic Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baurley, G.L. (1987). Revision of the IPA: do you know the onion chart? Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17(2), 118–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Canepari, L. (1983). Phonetic Notation–La Notazione Fonetica. Venice: Libreria Editrice Cafoscarina.Google Scholar
Catford, J.C. (1983). Pharyngeal and laryngeal sounds in Caucasian languages. In Bless, D. and Abbs, J. (editors) Vocal Fold Physiology. San Diego: College Hill Press, 344–50.Google Scholar
Catford, J.C. (1988). Notes on the phonetics of Nias. In McGinn, R. (editor) Studies in Austronesian Linguistics. Athens: Ohio University Center for S.E. Asia Studies, 151–72.Google Scholar
Henton, C.G. (1987). The IPA consonant chart: Mugwumps, holes and therapeutic suggestions. Journal of the International Phonetic Association 17(1), 15–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thomas, J.M.C., Bouquiaux, F. and Cloarec-Heiss, F. (1976). Initiation à la phonétique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar