Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:42:16.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Utility of an abbreviated version of the executive and social cognition battery in the detection of executive deficits in early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2010

EZEQUIEL GLEICHGERRCHT ,
TERESA TORRALVA ,
MARÍA ROCA  and
FACUNDO MANES
EZEQUIEL GLEICHGERRCHT
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina
TERESA TORRALVA
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
MARÍA ROCA
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
FACUNDO MANES*
Affiliation:
Institute of Cognitive Neurology (INECO), Buenos Aires, Argentina Institute of Neurosciences, Favaloro University, Buenos Aires, Argentina
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Facundo Manes, Castex 3293, Buenos Aires, Argentina. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The detection of executive deficits in early behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD) is crucial, as impairments in the executive domain constitute an important diagnostic feature of the newly proposed diagnostic criteria for bvFTD. Our group has recently demonstrated that classical executive tests fail to detect the executive deficits of a subgroup of early bvFTD patients. When administered an executive and social cognition battery (ESCB) that includes tasks that mimic everyday scenarios (e.g., affective decision-making, planning and organization, theory of mind), however, the performance of those bvFTD patients differed significantly from that of controls. One limitation of the ESCB is its lengthy nature (approximately 90 min). For this reason, the present study analyzes the usefulness of alternative shorter versions of this battery. We propose one particular two-task combination that demands approximately 30 min for its administration and scoring, and which presents similar discriminatory accuracy as that of the complete ESCB, while maintaining its significantly superior capacity to detect subtle executive deficits in bvFTD patients relative to classical executive tests. We suggest that, in clinical settings where tools, time, or human resources are scarce, this abbreviated ESCB may be useful in the detection of subtle yet impairing executive impairments of patients with bvFTD. (JINS, 2010, 16, 687–694.)

Keywords

Frontal lobePrefrontal cortexNeuropsychological assessmentEcological assessmentIowa Gambling TaskHotel Task
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 16 , Issue 4 , July 2010 , pp. 687 - 694
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). The “Reading the Mind in the Eyes” Test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251.Google Scholar
Bechara, A., Damasio, A.R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S.W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15.Google Scholar
Bozeat, S., Gregory, C.A., Ralph, M.A., & Hodges, J.R. (2000). Which neuropsychiatric and behavioural features distinguish frontal and temporal variants of frontotemporal dementia from Alzheimer’s disease? Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, and Psychiatry, 69, 178–186.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Davies, R.R., Kipps, C.M., Mitchell, J., Kril, J.J., Halliday, G.M., & Hodges, J.R. (2006). Progression in frontotemporal dementia: Identifying a benign behavioral variant by magnetic resonance imaging. Archives of Neurology, 63, 1627–1631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folstein, M.F., Folstein, S.E., & McHugh, P.R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Forman, M.S., Farmer, J., Johnson, J.K., Clark, C.M., Arnold, S.E., Coslett, H.B., et al. . (2006). Frontotemporal dementia: Clinicopathological correlations. Annals of Neurology, 59, 952–962.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Green, D.M. (1964). General prediction relating yes-no and forced-choice results. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 36, 1042.Google Scholar
Hanley, J.A., & McNeil, B.J. (1983). A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases. Radiology, 148, 839–843.Google Scholar
Hodges, J.R., & Miller, B. (2001). The neuropsychology of frontal variant frontotemporal dementia and semantic dementia. Introduction to the special topic papers: Part II. Neurocase, 7, 113.Google Scholar
Hughes, C.P., Berg, L., Danziger, W.L., Coben, L.A., & Martin, R.L. (1982). A new clinical scale for the staging of dementia. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 140, 566–572.Google Scholar
Josephs, K.A. (2008). Frontotemporal dementia and related disorders: Deciphering the enigma. Annals of Neurology, 64, 4–14.Google Scholar
Kipps, C.M., Davies, R.R., Mitchell, J., Kril, J.J., Halliday, G.M., & Hodges, J.R. (2007). Clinical significance of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: Application of an MRI visual rating scale. Dementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 23, 334–342.Google Scholar
Kipps, C.M., Knibb, J.A., Patterson, K., & Hodges, J.R. (2008). Chapter 28 Neuropsychology of frontotemporal dementia. Handbook of Clinical Neurology 88, 527–548.Google Scholar
Kipps, C.M., Nestor, P.J., Fryer, T.D., & Hodges, J.R. (2007). Behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia: Not all it seems? Neurocase, 13, 237–247.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D., Howieson, D.B., & Loring, D.W. (2004). Neuropsychological assessment. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Manly, T., Hawkins, K., Evans, J., Woldt, K., & Robertson, I.H. (2002). Rehabilitation of executive function: Facilitation of effective goal management on complex tasks using periodic auditory alerts. Neuropsychologia, 40, 271–281.Google Scholar
Mathuranath, P.S., Nestor, P.J., Berrios, G.E., Rakowicz, W., & Hodges, J.R. (2000). A brief cognitive test battery to differentiate Alzheimer’s disease and frontotemporal dementia. Neurology, 55, 1613–1620.Google Scholar
Mendez, M.F., Shapira, J.S., McMurtray, A., Licht, E., & Miller, B.L. (2007). Accuracy of the clinical evaluation for frontotemporal dementia. Archives of Neurology, 64, 830–835.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Neary, D., Snowden, J.S., Gustafson, L., Passant, U., Stuss, D., Black, S., et al. . (1998). Frontotemporal lobar degeneration: A consensus on clinical diagnostic criteria. Neurology, 51, 1546–1554.Google Scholar
Nelson, H.E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313–324.Google Scholar
Partington, J.E., & Leiter, R. (1949). Partington’s pathway test. The Psychological Service Center Bulletin, 1, 9–20.Google Scholar
Rascovsky, K., Hodges, J.R., Kipps, C.M., Johnson, J.K., Seeley, W.W., Mendez, M.F., et al. . (2007). Diagnostic criteria for the behavioral variant of frontotemporal dementia (bvFTD): Current limitations and future directions. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 21, S14–S18.Google Scholar
Shallice, T., & Burgess, P.W. (1991). Deficits in strategy application following frontal lobe damage in man. Brain, 114(Pt 2), 727–741.Google Scholar
Stone, V.E., Baron-Cohen, S., & Knight, R.T. (1998). Frontal lobe contributions to theory of mind. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 640–656.Google Scholar
Torralva, T., Kipps, C.M., Hodges, J.R., Clark, L., Bekinschtein, T., Roca, M., et al. . (2007). The relationship between affective decision-making and theory of mind in the frontal variant of fronto-temporal dementia. Neuropsychologia, 45, 342–349.Google Scholar
Torralva, T., Roca, M., Gleichgerrcht, E., Bekinschtein, T., & Manes, F. (2009). A neuropsychological battery to detect specific executive and social cognitive impairments in early frontotemporal dementia. Brain, 132(Pt 5), 1299–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler memory scale, complete kit (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation, 1997.Google Scholar
Zweig, M.H., & Campbell, G. (1993). Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) plots: A fundamental evaluation tool in clinical medicine. Clinical Chemistry, 39, 561–577.Google Scholar