Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:33:19.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Theory of Mind in Children with Traumatic Brain Injury

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 July 2012

Maureen Dennis ,
Nevena Simic ,
H. Gerry Taylor ,
Erin D. Bigler ,
Kenneth Rubin ,
Kathryn Vannatta ,
Cynthia A. Gerhardt ,
Terry Stancin ,
Caroline Roncadin  and
Keith Owen Yeates
Maureen Dennis*
Affiliation:
Program in Neuroscience & Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
Nevena Simic
Affiliation:
Program in Neuroscience & Mental Health, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Ontario Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
H. Gerry Taylor
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Erin D. Bigler
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Brigham Young University, Provo, Utah Department of Psychiatry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah
Kenneth Rubin
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Maryland, College Park, Maryland
Kathryn Vannatta
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
Cynthia A. Gerhardt
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
Terry Stancin
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, Case Western Reserve University, Rainbow Babies & Children's Hospital, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio Department of Psychiatry, MetroHealth Medical Center, Cleveland, Ohio
Caroline Roncadin
Affiliation:
Psychology Department, Peel Children's Centre, Mississauga, Ontario
Keith Owen Yeates
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio Center for Biobehavioral Health, The Research Institute at Nationwide Children's Hospital, Columbus, Ohio
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Maureen Dennis, Department of Psychology, The Hospital for Sick Children, 555 University Avenue, Toronto, ON. Canada, M5G 1X8. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Theory of mind (ToM) involves thinking about mental states and intentions to understand what other people know and to predict how they will act. We studied ToM in children with traumatic brain injury (TBI) and age- and gender-matched children with orthopedic injuries (OI), using a new three-frame Jack and Jill cartoon task that measures intentional thinking separate from contingent task demands. In the key ToM trials, which required intentional thinking, Jack switched a black ball from one hat to another of a different color, but Jill did not witness the switch; in the otherwise identical non-ToM trials, the switch was witnessed. Overall accuracy was higher in children with OI than in those with TBI. Children with severe TBI showed a larger decline in accuracy on ToM trials, suggesting a specific deficit in ToM among children with severe TBI. Accuracy was significantly higher on trials following errors than on trials following correct responses, suggesting that all groups monitored performance and responded to errors with increased vigilance. TBI is associated with poorer intentional processing in school-age children and adolescents relative to peers with OI; furthermore, children with TBI are challenged specifically by intentional demands, especially when their injury is severe. (JINS, 2012, 19, 1–9)

Keywords

IntentionalityChildhood head injuryGlasgow Coma ScaleSocial cognitionSocial problem solvingError monitoring
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 18 , Issue 5 , September 2012 , pp. 908 - 916
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Astington, J.W. (2003). Sometimes necessary, never sufficient: False-belief understanding and social competence. In B. Repacholi & V. Slaughter (Eds.), Individual differences in theory of mind: Implications for typical and atypical development. New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Astington, J.W., Jenkins, J.M. (1999). A longitudinal study of the relation between language and theory-of-mind development. Developmental Psychology, 35(5), 1311–1320.Google Scholar
Bartsch, K., Wellman, H. (1989). Young children's attribution of action to beliefs and desires. Child Development, 60(4), 946–964.Google Scholar
Bibby, H., McDonald, S. (2005). Theory of mind after traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychologia, 43(1), 99–114.Google Scholar
Brown, R.L. (2010). Epidemiology of injury and the impact of health disparities. Current Opinion in Pediatrics, 22, 321–325.Google Scholar
Carlson, S.M., Moses, L.J., Claxton, L.J. (2004). Individual differences in executive functioning and theory of mind: An investigation of inhibitory control and planning ability. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(4), 299–319.Google Scholar
Chapman, S.B., Sparks, G., Levin, H.S., Dennis, M., Roncadin, C., Zhang, L., Song, J. (2004). Discourse macrolevel processing after severe pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 37–60.Google Scholar
Chevrier, A.D., Noseworthy, M.D., Schachar, R. (2007). Dissociation of response inhibition and performance monitoring in the stop signal task using event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 28, 1347–1358.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Agostino, A., Roncadin, C., Levin, H. (2009). Theory of mind depends on domain-general executive functions of working memory and cognitive inhibition in children with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 13, 835–847.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M. (1993). Oral discourse skills in children and adolescents after early-onset hydrocephalus: Linguistic ambiguity, figurative language, speech acts, and script-based inferences. Journal of Pediatric Psychology, 18, 639–652.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A. (2000). Speech acts after mild or severe childhood head injury. Aphasiology, 14(4), 391–405.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A. (2001). Comparison of literal, inferential, and intentional text comprehension in children with mild or severe closed head injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 1–14.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Barnes, M.A., Donnelly, R.E., Wilkinson, M., Humphreys, R.P. (1996). Appraising and managing knowledge: Metacognitive skills after childhood head injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 12, 77–103.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Francis, D.J., Cirino, P.T., Schachar, R., Barnes, M.A., Fletcher, J.M. (2009). Why IQ is not a covariate in cognitive studies of neurodevelopmental disorders. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 331–343.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Guger, S., Roncadin, C., Barnes, M., Schachar, R. (2001a). Attentional-inhibitory control and social-behavioral regulation after childhood closed head injury. Do biological developmental and recovery variables predict outcome? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 683–692.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Guger, S., Roncadin, C., Barnes, M., Schachar, R. (2001b). Attentional control and social discourse after childhood closed head injury: Are frontal contusions, age at injury and time since injury predictive? Brain and Cognition, 48, 197–200.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Purvis, K., Barnes, M.A., Wilkinson, M., Winner, E. (2001). Understanding of literal truth, ironic criticism, and deceptive praise after childhood head injury. Brain and Language, 78, 1–16.Google Scholar
Dennis, M., Wilkinson, M., Humphreys, R.P. (1998). How children with head injury represent real and deceptive emotion in short narratives. Brain and Language, 61, 450–483.Google Scholar
Filippova, E., Astington, J.W. (2008). Further development in social reasoning revealed in discourse irony understanding. Child Development, 79(1), 126–138.Google Scholar
Frith, U., Frith, C. (2003). The biological basis of social interaction. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 151–155.Google Scholar
Gordon, A.C.L., Olson, D.R. (1998). The relation between acquisition of a theory of mind and the capacity to hold in mind. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 68(1), 70–83.Google Scholar
Greenbaum, R.L., Stevens, S.A., Nash, K., Koren, G., Rovet, J. (2009). Social cognitive and emotion processing abilities of children with fetal alcohol spectrum disorders: A comparison with attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Alcoholism, Clinical and Experimental Research, 33(10), 1656–1670.Google Scholar
Hanten, G., Dennis, M., Zhang, L., Barnes, M., Roberson, G., Archibald, J., Levin, H.S. (2004). Childhood head injury and metacognitive processes in language and memory. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25(1-2), 85–106.Google Scholar
Hein, G., Singer, T. (2008). I feel how you feel but not always: the empathic brain and its modulation. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 18, 153–158.Google Scholar
Hein, G., Silani, G., Preuschoff, K., Batson, C.D., Singer, T. (2010). Neural responses to ingroup and outgroup members' suffering predict individual differences in costly helping. Neuron, 68, 149–160.Google Scholar
Hill, E.L., Frith, U. (2003). Understanding autism: Insights from mind and brain. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358, 281–289.Google Scholar
Howard, I., Joseph, J.G., Natale, J.E. (2005). Pediatric traumatic brain injury: Do racial/ethnic disparities exist in brain injury severity, mortality, or medical disposition? Ethnicity & Disease, 15(Suppl. 5), 51–56.Google Scholar
Langlois, J.A., Rutland-Brown, W., Thomas, K.E. (2005). The incidence of traumatic brain injury among children in the United States: Differences by race. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 20, 229–238.Google Scholar
Levin, H., Hanten, G., Max, J., Li, X., Swank, P., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Schachar, R. (2007). Symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder following traumatic brain injury in children. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 28(2), 108–118.Google Scholar
Levin, H.S., Hanten, G., Roberson, G., Li, X., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M., Swank, P. (2008). Prediction of cognitive sequelae based on abnormal computed tomography findings in children following mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurosurgery. Pediatrics, 1(6), 461–470.Google Scholar
Levin, H.S., Zhang, L., Dennis, M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Schachar, R., Max, J., Hunter, J.V. (2004). Psychosocial outcome of TBI in children with unilateral frontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 305–316.Google Scholar
Martín-Rodríguez, J.F., León-Carrión, J. (2010). Theory of mind deficits in patients with acquired brain injury: A quantitative review. Neuropsychologia, 48(5), 1181–1191.Google Scholar
Max, J.E., Keatley, E., Wilde, E.A., Bigler, E.D., Levin, H.S., Schachar, R.J., Yang, T.T. (2011). Anxiety disorders in children and adolescents in the first six months after traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 23(1), 29–39.Google Scholar
Max, J.E., Levin, H.S., Landis, J., Schachar, R., Saunders, A.E., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M. (2005). Predictors of personality change due to traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents in the first six months after injury. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, 44, 435–442.Google Scholar
Max, J.E., Levin, H.S., Schachar, R., Landis, J., Saunders, A.E., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M. (2006). Predictors of personality change due to traumatic brain injury in children and adolescents 6 to 24 months after injury. Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 18, 21–32.Google Scholar
McKinlay, A., Kyonka, E.G.E., Grace, R.C., Horwood, L.J., Fergusson, D.M., MacFarlane, M.R. (2010). An investigation of the pre-injury risk factors associated with children who experience traumatic brain injury. Injury Prevention, 16, 31–35.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N. (1995). What infant memory tells us about infantile amnesia: Long-term recall and deferred imitation. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 59(3), 497–515.Google Scholar
Meltzoff, A.N., Gopnik, A., Repacholi, B. (1999). Toddlers understanding of intentions, desires and emotions: Explorations of the dark ages. In P. Zelazo (Ed.), Developing theories of intention. New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Moses, L.J. (2001). Executive accounts of theory of mind development. Child Development, 72, 688–690.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Muscara, F., Catroppa, C., Eren, S., Anderson, V. (2009). The impact of injury severity on long-term social outcome following paediatric traumatic brain injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 19(4), 541–546.Google Scholar
Olsson, A., Nearing, K.L., Phelps, E.A. (2007). Learning fears by observing others: The neural systems of social fear transmission. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 2, 3–11.Google Scholar
Ornstein, T.J., Levin, H.S., Chen, S., Hanten, G., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Dennis, M., Schachar, R. (2009). Performance monitoring in children following traumatic brain injury. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 50(4), 506–513.Google Scholar
Parslow, R.C., Morris, K.P., Tasker, R.C., Forsyth, R.J., Hawley, C.A. (2005). Epidemiology of traumatic brain injury in children receiving intensive care in the UK. Archives of Disease in Childhood, 90, 1182–1187.Google Scholar
Premack, D., Woodruff, G. (1978). Chimpanzee problem-solving: A test for comprehension. Science, 202, 532–535.Google Scholar
Robinson, E.J. (2003). Six-year-olds’ contradictory judgments about knowledge and beliefs. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7, 235–237.Google Scholar
Roncadin, C., Guger, S., Archibald, J., Barnes, M., Dennis, M. (2004). Working memory after mild, moderate, or severe childhood head injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 21–36.Google Scholar
Shamay-Tsoory, S.G., Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Dissociable prefrontal networks for cognitive and affective theory of mind: A lesion study. Neuropsychologia, 45(13), 3054–3067.Google Scholar
Shammi, P., Stuss, D.T. (1999). Humor appreciation. A role for the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122, 657–666.Google Scholar
Singer, T., Seymour, B., O'Doherty, J., Kaube, H., Dolan, R.J., Firth, C.D. (2004). Empathy for pain involves the affective but not sensory components of pain. Science, 303, 1157–1162.Google Scholar
Sodian, B., Taylor, C., Harris, P.L., Perner, J. (1991). Early deception and the child's theory of mind: False trails and genuine markers. Child Development, 62, 468–483.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T., Gallup, G.G. Jr, Alexander, M.P. (2001). The frontal lobes are necessary for ‘theory of mind’. Brain, 124(Pt 2), 279–286.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G., Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2(7872), 81–84.Google Scholar
Uekermann, J., Kraemer, M., Abdel-Hamid, M., Schimmelmann, B.G., Hebebrand, J., Daum, I., Kis, B. (2010). Social cognition in attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 734–743.Google Scholar
Wellman, H.M., Cross, D., Watson, J. (2001). Meta-analysis of theory-of-mind development: The truth about false belief. Child Development, 72(3), 655–684.Google Scholar
Wimmer, H., Perner, J. (1983). Beliefs about beliefs: Representation and constraining function of wrong beliefs in young children's understanding of deception. Cognition, 13(1), 103–128.Google Scholar
Wobbrock, J.O., Findlater, L., Gergle, D., Higgins, J.J. (2011). User-defined gestures for surface computing. Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems ’11: The Aligned Rank Transform for nonparametric factorial analyses using only ANOVA procedures. Vancouver, British Columbia: New York: ACM Press, pp. 143–146.Google Scholar
Wu, T.C., Wilde, E.A., Bigler, E.D., Li, X., Merkley, T.L., Yallampalli, R., Levin, H.S. (2010). Longitudinal changes in the corpus callosum following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuroscience, 32(5–6), 361–373.Google Scholar
Yeates, K., Bigler, E., Dennis, M., Gerhardt, C., Rubin, K., Stancin, T., Vannatta, K. (2007). Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: A heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychological Bulletin, 133(3), 535–556.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O., Taylor, H.G. (1997). Predicting premorbid neuropsychological functioning following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 19, 825–837.Google Scholar
Yates, P.J., Williams, W.H., Harris, A., Round, A., Jenkins, R. (2006). An epidemiological study of head injuries in a UK population attending an emergency department. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 77, 699–701.Google Scholar
Yuh, E.L., Cooper, S.R., Ferguson, A.R., Manley, G.T. (2012). Quantitative CT improves outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 29, 735–746.Google Scholar