Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:55:32.088Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Syntactic language processing: ERP lesion data on the role of the basal ganglia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2004

SONJA A. KOTZ ,
STEFAN FRISCH ,
D. YVES VON CRAMON  and
ANGELA D. FRIEDERICI
SONJA A. KOTZ
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany Day Care Clinic of Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany
STEFAN FRISCH
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany Institute of Linguistics, University of Potsdam, Germany
D. YVES VON CRAMON
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany Day Care Clinic of Cognitive Neurology, University of Leipzig, Germany
ANGELA D. FRIEDERICI
Affiliation:
Max-Planck-Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience, Leipzig, Germany
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The role of the basal ganglia in syntactic language processing was investigated with event-related brain potentials in fourteen neurologically impaired patients. Seven of these patients had basal ganglia lesions while 7 other patients primarily had lesions of the left temporo–parietal region excluding the basal ganglia. All patients listened to sentences that were either correct or included a verb argument structure violation. In previous experiments this type of violation elicited a biphasic pattern of an N400–P600 complex in young healthy participants. While the N400 may result from incorrect semantic-thematic role assignment, the P600 reflects the fact that verb information does not license the syntactic structure at present. Results of the patient experiment revealed a double dissociation: patients with left temporo–parietal lesions only show a P600, whereas patients with lesions of the basal ganglia showed no P600, but a negativity with extended duration that resembled an N400. The latter pattern not only confirms previous reports that the basal ganglia modulate the P600 but extends these results by showing that the N400 as a late semantic–thematic integration process appears partially modulated by the basal ganglia. (JINS, 2003, 9, 1053–1060.)

Keywords

Basal gangliaEvent-related brain potentials (ERPs)E(L)ANP600N400
Type
THEMATIC ARTICLES
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 9 , Issue 7 , November 2003 , pp. 1053 - 1060
Copyright
© 2003 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M.P., Naeser, M.A., & Palumbo, C.L. (1987). Correlations of subcortical CT lesion sites and aphasic profiles. Brain, 110, 961–991.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenstein, C., Daum, I., & Ackermann, H. (1998). Emotional processing following cortical and subcortical brain damage: Contribution of the fronto–striatal circuitry. Behavioural Neurology, 11, 29–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breitenstein, C., Van Lancker, D., Daum, I., & Waters, C. (2001). Impaired perception of vocal emotions in Parkinson's disease: Influence of speech time processing and executive functioning. Brain and Cognition, 45, 277–314.Google Scholar
Cappa, S.F. & Abutalebi, J. (1999). Subcortical aphasia. In F. Fabbro (Ed.), The concise encyclopedia of language pathology (pp. 319–327). Oxford, UK: Pergamon Press
Coulson, S., King, J., & Kutas, M. (1998). Expect the unexpected: Event-related brain response to morphosyntactic violations. Language and Cognitive Processes, 13, 21–58.Google Scholar
Crosson, B. (1999). Subcortical mechanisms in language: Lexical–semantic mechanisms and the thalamus. Brain and Cognition, 40, 414–438.Google Scholar
Friederici, A.D. (1995). The time course of syntactic activation during language processing: A model based on neuropsychological and neurophysiological data. Brain and Language, 50, 259–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D. (1999). The neurobiology of language comprehension. In A.D. Friederici (Ed.), Language comprehension: A biological perspective (2nd ed., pp. 265–304). Berlin: Springer.
Friederici, A.D. (2002). Towards a neural basis of auditory sentence processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6, 78–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., & Frisch, S. (2000). Verb-argument structure processing: The role of verb-specific and argument-specific information. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 476–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., Kotz, S.A., Werheid, K., Hein, G., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2003). Syntactic comprehension in Parkinson's disease: Investigating early and late integrational processes using ERPs. Neuropsychology, 17, 133–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friederici, A.D., von Cramon, D.Y., & Kotz, S.A. (1999). Language related brain potentials in patients with cortical and subcortical left hemisphere lesions. Brain, 122, 1033–1047.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frisch, S., Hahne, A., & Friederici, A.D. (2000). ERP evidence for the priority of phrase structure information over argument structure information in sentence processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience (Suppl. 12) 51.Google Scholar
Frisch, S., Kotz, S.A.., Friederici, A.D., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2003). Why the P600 is not just a P300. Electroencephalography and Clinical Neurophysiology, 114, 336–340.Google Scholar
Frisch, S., Schlesewsky, M., Saddy, D., & Alpermann, A. (2002). The P600 as an indicator of syntactic ambiguity. Cognition, 85, B83–B92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodglass, H. (1993). Understanding aphasia. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
Gotham, A.M., Brown, R.G., & Marsden, C.D. (1988). “Frontal” cognitive function in patients with Parkinson's disease “on” and “off” levodopa. Brain, 111, 299–321.Google Scholar
Grossman, M., Carvell, S., Gollomp, S., Stern, M.B., Reivich, M., Morrison, D., Alavi, A., & Hurtig, H.I. (1993). Cognitive and physiological substrates of impaired sentence processing in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 5, 480–498.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grossman, M., Carvell, S., Gollomp, S., Stern, M.B., Vernon, R.N., & Hurtig, H.I. (1991). Sentence comprehension and praxis deficits in Parkinson's disease. Neurology, 41, 1620–1626.Google Scholar
Grossman, M., Carvell, S., Stern, M.B., Gollomp, S., & Hurtig, H.I. (1992). Sentence comprehension in Parkinson's disease: The role of attention and memory. Brain and Language, 42, 347–384.Google Scholar
Grossman, M., Zurif, E., Lee, C., Prather, P., Kalmanson, J., Stern, M.B., & Hurtig, H.I. (2002). Information processing speed and sentence comprehension in Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology, 16, 174–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gunter, T.C., Stowe, L.A., & Mulder, G. (1997). When syntax meets semantics. Psychophysiology, 34, 660–676.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hahne, A. & Friederici, A.D. (1999). Electrophysiological evidence for two steps in syntactic analysis: Early automatic and late controlled processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 11, 194–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaan, E., Harris, A., Gibson, G., & Holcomb, P.J. (2000). The P600 as an index of syntactic integration difficulty. Language and Cognitive Processes, 15, 159–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotz, S.A. & Friederici, A.D. (2003). Electrophysiology of normal and pathological language processing. Journal of Neurolinguistics, 16, 43–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kotz, S.A., Meyer, M., Alter, K., Besson, M., von Cramon, D.Y., & Friederici, A. (in press). On the lateralization of emotional prosody: An fMRI investigation. Brain and Language.
Lieberman, P. (2001). Human language and our reptilian brain: The subcortical bases of speech, syntax, and thought. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 4, 32–51.Google Scholar
Lieberman, P., Friedman, J., & Feldman, L.S. (1990). Syntactic deficits in Parkinson's disease. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disorders, 178, 360–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lieberman, P., Kako, E., Friedman, J., Tajchman, G., Feldman, L.S., & Jiminez, E.B. (1992). Speech production, syntax comprehension, and cognitive deficits in Parkinson's disease. Brain and Language, 43, 169–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marsden, C.D. & Obeso, J.A. (1994). The functions of the basal ganglia and the paradox of sterotaxic surgery in Parkinson's disease. Brain, 117, 877–897.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mortimer, J.A., Pirozzolo, F.J., Hansch, E.C., & Webster, D.D. (1982). Relationship of motor symptoms to intellectual deficits in Parkinson disease. Neurology, 32, 133–137.Google Scholar
Nadeau, S.E. & Crosson, B. (1997). Subcortical aphasia. Brain and Language, 58, 403–409.Google Scholar
Natsopoulos, D., Grouios, G., Bostantzopoulou, G., Mentenopoulos, G., Katsarou, Z., & Logothetis, J. (1993). Algorithmic and heuristic strategies in comprehension of complement clauses by patients with Parkinson's disease. Neuropsychology, 31, 951–964.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L., Holcomb, P.J., & Swinney, D.A. (1994). Brain potentials elicited by garden-path sentences: Evidence of the application of verb information during parsing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 20, 786–803.Google Scholar
Osterhout, L. (1997). On the brain response to syntactic anomalies—manipulations of word position and word class reveal individual differences. Brain & Language, 59, 494–522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pell, M.D. (2002). Surveying emotional prosody in the brain: Some key landmarks and new directions. In B. Bel and I. Marlein (Eds.), Speech prosody, Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France (pp. 77–82).
Pfeifer, E., Novagk, R., & Maess, B. (1995). Software for EEG/ERP evaluation. In A.D. Friederici (Ed.), Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience Leipzig annual report (pp. 51–55). Leipzig, Germany: Max Planck Institute of Cognitive Neuroscience.
Pickett, E.R., Kuniholm, E., Protopapas, A., Friedman, J., & Lieberman, P. (1998). Selective motor, syntax and cognitive deficits associated with bilateral damage to the head of the caudate nucleus and the putamen: A single case study. Neuropsychologia, 36, 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, S.M., Mayes, A.R., & Harrington, D.L (2001). The evolution of brain activation during temporal processing. Nature Neuroscience, 4, 317–323.Google Scholar
Robin, D.A. & Schienberg, S. (1990). Subcortical lesions and aphasia. Journal of Speech and Hearing Disorders, 55, 90–100.Google Scholar
Schubotz, R.I., Friederici, A.D., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2000). Time perception and motor timing: A common cortical and subcortical basis revealed by fMRI. Neuroimage, 11, 1–12.Google Scholar
Tyler, L.K. & Marslen-Wilson, W.D. (1986). The effects of context on the recognition of polymorphemic words. Journal of Memory and Language, 25, 741–752.Google Scholar
Ullman, M.T. (2001). A neurocognitive perspective on language: The declarative/procedural model. Neuroscience, 2, 717–726.Google Scholar
Ullman, M.T., Corkin, S., Coppola, M., Hickok, G., Growdon, J.H., Koroshetz, W.J., & Pinker, S. (1997). A neural dissociation within language: Evidence that the mental dictionary is part of declarative memory, and that grammatical rules are processed by the procedural system. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 9, 266–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wallesch, C.W. & Papagno, C. (1988). Subcortical aphasia. In F.C. Rose, R. Whurr, & M.A. Wyke (Eds.), Aphasia (pp. 256–287) London: Whurr Publishers.