Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:04:07.908Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Self-regulation as a mediator of the effects of childhood traumatic brain injury on social and behavioral functioning

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 February 2007

KALAICHELVI GANESALINGAM ,
ANN SANSON ,
VICKI ANDERSON  and
KEITH OWEN YEATES
KALAICHELVI GANESALINGAM
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
ANN SANSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
VICKI ANDERSON
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, The University of Melbourne, Victoria, Australia Murdoch Children's Research Centre, Victoria, Australia
KEITH OWEN YEATES
Affiliation:
Department of Pediatrics, The Ohio State University, and Children's Research Institute, Columbus, Ohio
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This study builds on our earlier investigation (see Ganesalingam et al., 2006). We showed previously that children with moderate to severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI) had poorer self-regulation and social and behavioral functioning than their uninjured peers and that self-regulation predicted significant variance in parent- and teacher-rated social and behavioral outcomes, regardless of the presence or absence of TBI. In this study, we examine self-regulation as a mediator of the relationship between TBI and the outcomes. Participants included 65 children with moderate to severe TBI and 65 children without TBI matched for age and gender. Participants were between 6 and 11 years of age. Children completed an assessment of cognitive, emotional, and behavioral self-regulation, and social and behavioral functioning. Mediation was assessed using a bootstrapping approach (a relatively novel statistical method for assessing specific indirect effects in models with multiple mediators). Analyses indicated that, after controlling for socioeconomic status (SES), aspects of self-regulation accounted for individual variation in the outcomes, and acted as a significant mediator of the effects of TBI on the outcomes. Self-regulatory deficits may reflect the relative vulnerability of the prefrontal cortex to TBI and may help account for post-injury difficulties in social and behavioral functioning. (JINS, 2007, 13, 298–311.)

Keywords

Traumatic brain injuryChildrenSelf-regulationSocial and behavioral functioningMultiple mediatorsSpecific indirect effects
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , March 2007 , pp. 298 - 311
Copyright
© 2007 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, V., Fenwick, T., Manly, T., & Robertson, I. (1998). Attention skill following traumatic brain injury in childhood: A componential analysis. Brain Injury, 12, 937–949.Google Scholar
Australian Bureau of Statistics. (2001). Populations of Australia and New Zealand: A comparison. Canberra: Government Printing Office.
Banerjee, M. (1997). Peeling the onion: A multilayered view of children's emotional development. In S. Hala (Ed.), The development of social cognition: Studies in developmental psychology (pp. 241–272). East Sussex, UK: Psychology Press.
Barkley, R.A. (1997). ADHD and the nature of self-control. New York: The Guilford Press.
Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182.Google Scholar
Bigler, E.D. (2001). Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging in traumatic brain injury. Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16, 117–134.Google Scholar
Bradley, S.J. (2000). Affect regulation and the development of psychopathology. New York: The Guilford Press.
Casey, R.J. (1993). Children's emotions: The relationships among expressions, reported, and self-understanding. Development Psychology, 29, 119–129.Google Scholar
Cicchetti, D. (1994). Emotion regulation: Influences of attachment relationships. In N.A. Fox (Ed.), The development of emotion regulation: Biological and behavioral considerations (pp. 228–249). Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 59, (2–3, Serial No. 240).Google Scholar
Cook, E.T., Greenberg, M.T., & Kusche, C.A. (1994). The relations between emotional understanding, intellectual functioning, and disruptive behavior problems in elementary school-age children. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 22, 205–219.Google Scholar
Dagenbach, D. & Carr, T.H. (Eds.). (1994). Inhibitory processes in attention, memory, and language. San Diego, CA: Academic.
Dodge, K.A., Laird, R., Lochman, J.E., & Zelli, A. (2002). Multidimensional latent-construct analysis of children's social information processing patterns: Correlations with aggressive behavior problems. Psychological Assessment, 14, 60–73.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N. & Fabes, R.A. (1992). Emotion, regulation, and the development of social competence. In M.S. Clark (Ed.), Review of personality and social psychology: Vol. 14. Emotion and social behavior (pp. 119–150). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Murphy, B., Maszk, P., Smith, M., & Karbon, M. (1995). The role of emotionality and regulation in children's social functioning: A longitudinal study. Child Development, 66, 1360–1384.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Fabes, R.A., Shepard, S.A., Murphy, B.C., Guthrie, I.K., Jones, S., Friedman, J., Poulin, R., & Maszk, P. (1997). Contemporaneous and longitudinal prediction of children's social functioning from regulation and emotionality. Child Development, 68, 642–664.Google Scholar
Eisenberg, N., Guthrie, I.K., Fabes, R.A., Shepard, S., Losoya, S., Murphy, B.C., Jones, S., Poulin, R., & Reiser, M. (2000). Prediction of elementary school children's externalizing problem behaviors from attentional and behavioral regulation and negative emotionality. Child Development, 71, 1367–1382.Google Scholar
Eyberg, S. & Robinson, E.A. (1983). Conduct problem behavior: Standardization of a behavior rating scale with adolescents. Journal of Clinical child Psychology, 12, 347–354.Google Scholar
Fletcher, J.M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Miner, M., Levin, H.S., & Eisenberg, H.M. (1990). Behavioral changes after closed head injury in children. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 58, 93–98.Google Scholar
Funderburk, B.W. & Eyberg, S.M. (1989). Psychometric characteristics of the Sutter-Eyberg Student Behavior Inventory: A School behavior rating scale for use with preschool children. Behavioral Assessment, 11, 297–313.Google Scholar
Ganesalingam, K., Sanson, A., Anderson, V., & Yeates, K.O. (2006). Self-regulation and social and behavioral functioning following childhood traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12, 609–621.Google Scholar
Grattan, L.M. & Eslinger, P.J. (1991). Frontal lobe damage in children and adults: A comparative review. Developmental Neuropsychology, 7, 283–326.Google Scholar
Gresham, F.M. & Elliot, S.N. (1990). Social skills rating system manual. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
Isquith, P.K., Crawford, J.S., Espy, K.A., & Gioia, G.A. (2005). Assessment of executive functions in preschool-aged children. Mental Retardation and Developmental Disabilities Research Reviews, 11, 209–215.Google Scholar
Kagan, J. (1966). Reflection-impulsivity: The generality and dynamics of conceptual tempo. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 71, 17–24.Google Scholar
Kraus, J.F. (1995). Epidemiological features of brain injury in children: Occurrence, children at risk, cause and manner of injury, severity and outcomes. In S.H. Broman & M.E. Michel (Eds.), Traumatic brain injury in children (pp. 22–39). New York: Oxford University Press.
Krueger, R.F., Caspi, A., Moffitt, T.E., White, J., & Stouthamer-Loeber, M. (1996). Delay of gratification, psychopathology, and personality: Is low self-control specific to externalizing problems? Journal of Personality, 64, 107–129.Google Scholar
Lemerise, E.A. & Arsenio, W.F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71, 107–118.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Luria, A.R. (1973). The working brain. New York: Basic Books.
Mangeot, S., Armstrong, K., Colvin, A.N., Yeates, K.O., & Taylor, H.G. (2002). Long-term executive function deficits in children with traumatic brain injuries: Assessment using the Brief Rating Inventory of Executive Function (BRIEF). Child Neuropsychology, 8, 271–284.Google Scholar
Manly, T., Robertson, I.H., Anderson, V., & Nimmo-Smith, I. (1999). Test of everyday attention. Bury St. Edmunds, UK: Thames Valley Test Company Limited.
Max, J.E., Roberts, M.A., Koele, S.L., Lindgren, S.D., Robin, D.A., Arndt, S., Smith, W.L., & Sato, Y. (1999). Cognitive outcome in children and adolescents following severe traumatic brain injury: Influence of psychosocial, psychiatric, and injury-related variables. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 5, 58–68.Google Scholar
Max, J.E., Lansing, A.E., Koele, S.L., Castillo, C.S., Bokura, H., & Schachar, R. (2004). Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder in children and adolescents following traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuropsychology, 25, 159–177.Google Scholar
Middleton, J.A. (2001). Practitioner review: Psychological sequelae of head injury in children and adolescents. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 165–180.Google Scholar
Mischel, W. & Ebbesen, E.B. (1970). Attention in delay of gratification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 16, 329–337.Google Scholar
National Health Information Management Advisory Council (2001). National health plan for Australia and New Zealand. Canberra, Australia: Commonwealth Department of Health and Ageing, Publications Production Unit.
Olson, S.L., Sameroff, A.J., Kerr, D.C., Lopez, N.L., & Wellman, H.M. (2005). Developmental foundations of externalizing problems in young children: The role of effortful control. Development and Psychopathology, 17, 25–45.Google Scholar
Preacher, K.J. & Hayes, A.F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36, 717–731.Google Scholar
Rodriguez, M.L., Michel, W., & Shoda, Y. (1989). Cognitive person variables in the delay of gratification of older children at risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 358–367.Google Scholar
Rothbart, M.K. (1989). Temperament in childhood: A framework. In G.A. Kohnstamm, J.E. Bates, & M.K. Rothbart (Eds.), Temperament in childhood (pp. 59–73). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
Rothbart, M.K. & Bates, J.E. (1998). Temperament. In W. Daman (Ed.), Handbook of child psychology: Social, emotional, and personality development, 5th ed. (pp. 105–176). New York: Wiley.
Rueda, M.R., Posner, M.I., & Rothbart, M.K. (2005). The development of executive attention: Contributions to the emergence of self-regulation. Developmental Neuropsychology, 28, 573–594.Google Scholar
Saarni, C. (1997). Emotional competence and self-regulation in childhood. In P. Salovey & D.J. Sluyter (Eds.), Emotional development and emotional intelligence: Educational implications. New York: Basic Books.
Schore, A.N. (1994). Affect regulation and the origin of the self: The neurobiology of emotional development. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Sethi, A., Michel, W., Aber, J.L., Shoda, Y., & Rodriguez, M.L. (2000). The role of strategic attention deployment in development of self-regulation: Predicting preschoolers' delay of gratification from mother-toddler interactions. Developmental Psychology, 36, 767–777.Google Scholar
Shields, A. & Cicchetti, D. (1998a). Emotion Regulation Checklist: Provided by Dante Cicchetti, University of Minnesota.
Shields, A. & Cicchetti, D. (1998b). Reactive aggression among maltreated children: The contributions of attention and emotion dysregulation. Journal of Clinical and Child Psychology, 27, 381–395.Google Scholar
Shields, A.M., Cicchetti, D., & Ryan, R.M. (1994). The development of emotional and behavioral self-regulation and social competence among maltreated school-age children. Development and Psychopathology, 6, 57–75.Google Scholar
Sobel, M.E. (1988). Direct and indirect effects in linear structural equation models. In J.S. Long (Ed.), Common problems/proper solutions: Avoiding error in quantitative research (pp. 46–64). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
Stuss, D.T. & Benson, D.F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press.
Taylor, H.G., Yeates, K.O., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Klein, S.K., & Stacin, T. (1999). Influences on first year recovery from traumatic brain injury in children. Neuropsychology, 13, 76–89.Google Scholar
Teasdale, G. & Jennett, B. (1974). Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness: A practical scale. Lancet, 2, 81–84.Google Scholar
Wilde, E.A., Hunter, J.V., Newsome, M.R., Scheibel, R.S., Bigler, E.D., Johnson, J.L., Fearing, M.A., Cleavinger, H.B., Xiaoqi, L., Swank, P.R., Pedroza, C., Roberson, G.S., Bachevalier, &J., Harvey, S.L. (2005). Frontal and temporal morphometric findings on MRI in children after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 22, 333–344.Google Scholar
Yeates, K.O. (2000). Closed-head injury. In K.O. Yeates, M.D. Ris, & H.G. Taylor (Eds.), Pediatric neuropsychology: Research, theory and practice (pp. 92–116). New York: Guilford Press.
Yeates, K.O., Bigler, E.D., Dennis, M., Gerhardt, C.A., Rubin, K.H., Stancin, T., Taylor, H.G., & Vannatta, C., (in press). Social outcomes in childhood brain disorder: A heuristic integration of social neuroscience and developmental psychology. Psychological Bulletin.
Yeates, K.O., Swift, E., Taylor, H.G., Wade, S.L., Drotar, D., Stancin, T., & Minich, N. (2004). Short- and long-term social outcomes following pediatric traumatic brain injury. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 10, 412–426.Google Scholar