Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:58:44.791Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of frontal cortex in inferential reasoning: Evidence from the Word Context Test

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2005

KATRINA KEIL ,
JULIANA BALDO ,
EDITH KAPLAN ,
JOEL KRAMER  and
DEAN C. DELIS
KATRINA KEIL
Affiliation:
Casa Colina Centers for Rehabilitation, Pomona, California
JULIANA BALDO
Affiliation:
VA Northern California Health Care System, Sacramento, California
EDITH KAPLAN
Affiliation:
Boston University School of Medicine and Suffolk University, Boston, Massachusetts
JOEL KRAMER
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco, California
DEAN C. DELIS
Affiliation:
VA Medical Center, San Diego and the University of California, San Diego, Medical School, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Problem: Inferential reasoning in language involves the ability to deduce information based on context and prior experience. This ability has been generally studied as a right-hemisphere function. Recent research, however, has suggested that inferencing involves anterior regions of both the left and right hemispheres. Methods: We further explored this idea by testing a group of non-aphasic, focal frontal patients (right and left hemisphere) on a new test of inferencing, the Word Context Test. The Word Context Test requires examinees to identify the meaning of a made-up word (e.g., prifa) based on its use in a series of sentences. Findings: Patients with frontal lobe lesions were significantly impaired on this task relative to a group of age- and education-matched controls. Contrary to earlier research focusing on a special role for the right hemisphere in inferencing, there was considerable overlap in performance of right- and left-frontal patients, with right-frontal patients performing better. Conclusions: These findings suggest that inferencing is disrupted following focal frontal injury and have implications for discourse comprehension in non-aphasic patients. (JINS, 2005, 11, 426–433.)

Keywords

Frontal lobesInferencingReasoningPrefrontal cortexCognitive controlExecutive function
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , July 2005 , pp. 426 - 433
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Alexander, M.P., Benson, D.F., & Stuss, D.T. (1989). Frontal lobes and language. Brain and Language, 37, 656–691.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldo, J., Shimamura, A., Delis, D., Kramer, J., & Knight, R. (1998). Performance of patients with frontal lobe lesions on a new executive function test battery. Abstract for the Cognitive Neuroscience Society.
Baldo, J.V., Delis, D., Kramer, J., & Shimamura, A.P. (2002). Memory performance on the California Verbal Learning Test–II: Findings from patients with focal frontal lesions. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 539–546.Google Scholar
Baldo, J.V., Delis, D.C., Wilkins, D.P., & Shimamura, A.P. (2004). Is it bigger than a breadbox? Performance of patients with prefrontal lesions on a new executive function test. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 19, 407–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldo, J.V. & Shimamura, A.P. (1998). Letter and category fluency in patients with frontal lobe lesions. Neuropsychology, 12, 259–267.Google Scholar
Baldo, J.V. & Shimamura, A.P. (2000). Spatial and color working memory in patients with lateral prefrontal cortex lesions. Psychobiology, 28, 156–167.Google Scholar
Brownell, H.H., Michel, D., Powelson, J., & Gardner, H. (1983). Surprise but not coherence: Sensitivity to verbal humor in right-hemisphere patients. Brain and Language, 18, 20–27.Google Scholar
Brownell, H., Potter, H.H., & Bihrle, A. (1986). Inference deficits in right brain-damaged patients. Brain and Language, 27, 310–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Channon, S. & Crawford, S. (2000). The effects of anterior lesions on performance on a story comprehension test: Left anterior impairment on a theory of mind-type task. Neuropsychologia, 38, 1006–1017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chao, L. & Knight, R. (1996). Human prefrontal lesions increase distractibility to irrelevant sensory inputs. NeuroReport, 6, 45–50.Google Scholar
Delis, D., Cullum, C.M., Butters, N., Cairns, P., & Prifitera, A. (1988). Wechsler Memory Scale–Revised and California Verbal Learning Test: Convergence and divergence. Clinical Neuropsychologist, 2, 188–196.Google Scholar
Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Delis, D., Kaplan, E., Kramer, J., & Ober, B. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test–II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
D'Esposito, M., Aguirre, G., Zarahn, E., Ballard, D., Shin, R., & Lease, J. (1998). Functional MRI studies of spatial and nonspatial working memory. Cognitive Brain Research, 7, 1–13.Google Scholar
Ferstl, E.C., Guthke, T., & von Cramon, D.Y. (2002). Text comprehension after brain injury: left prefrontal lesions affect inference processes. Neuropsychology, 16, 292–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferstl, E.C. & von Cramon, D.Y. (2001). Change of perspective in discourse comprehension: Encoding and retrieval processes after brain injury. Brain and Language, 70, 385–420.Google Scholar
Freedman, M. & Oscar-Berman, M. (1986). Bilateral frontal lobe disease and selective delayed response deficits in humans. Behavioral Neuroscience, 100, 337–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldman-Rakic, P. (1987). Circuitry of primate prefrontal cortex and regulation of behavior by representational memory. In F. Plum (Ed.), Handbook of physiology, nervous system, Vol. V: Higher functions of the brain, Part 1 (pp. 373–417). Bethesda: American Physiological Society.
Harden, W.D., Cannito, M.P., & Dagenais, P.A. (1995). Inferential abilities of normal and right hemisphere damaged adults. Journal of Communication Disorders, 28, 247–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henry, J.D. & Crawford, J.R. (2004). A meta-analytic review of verbal fluency performance following focal cortical lesions. Neuropsychology, 18, 284–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hier, D.B. & Kaplan, J. (1980). Verbal comprehension deficits after right hemisphere damage. Applied Psycholinguistics, 1, 279–294.Google Scholar
Kaczmarek, B.L. (1984). Neurolinguistic analysis of verbal utterances in patients with focal lesions of frontal lobes. Brain and Language, 21, 52–58.Google Scholar
Kaplan, J.A., Brownell, H.H., Jacobs, J.R., & Gardner, H. (1990). The effects of right hemisphere damage on the pragmatic interpretation of conversational remarks. Brain and Language, 38, 315–333.Google Scholar
Keil, K. & Kaszniak, A.W. (2002). Examining executive function in individuals with brain injury: A review. Aphasiology, 16, 305–335.Google Scholar
Kertesz, A. (1982). Western Aphasia Battery. New York: Grune & Stratton.
Lehman-Blake, M. & Tompkins, C.A. (2001). Predictive inferencing in adults with right hemisphere brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 44, 639–654.Google Scholar
Lezak, M.D. (1995). Neuropsychological assessment (3rd ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
McDonald, S. (1993). Viewing the brain sideways? Frontal versus right hemisphere explanations of non-aphasic language disorders. Aphasiology, 7, 535–549.Google Scholar
McDonald, S. & Pearce, S. (1996). Clinical insights into pragmatic theory: Frontal lobe deficits and sarcasm. Brain and Language, 53, 81–104.Google Scholar
Milner, B. & Petrides, M. (1984). Behavioural effects of frontal-lobe lesions in man. Trends in Neuroscience, 7, 403–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myers, P.S. & Brookshire, R.H. (1996). Effect of visual and inferential variables on scene descriptions by right-hemisphere-damaged and non-brain-damaged adults. Journal of Speech and Hearing Research, 39, 870–880.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novoa, O.P. & Ardila, A. (1987). Linguistic abilities in patients with prefrontal damage. Brain and Language, 30, 206–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pearce, S., McDonald, S., & Coltheart, M. (1998). Interpreting ambiguous advertisements: The effect of frontal lobe damage. Brain and Cognition, 38, 150–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Perret, E. (1974). The left frontal lobe of man and the suppression of habitual responses in verbal categorical behaviour. Neuropsychologia, 12, 323–330.Google Scholar
Shammi, P. & Stuss, D.T. (1999). Humour appreciation: A role of the right frontal lobe. Brain, 122, 657–666.Google Scholar
Siegal, M., Carrington, J., & Radel, M. (1996). Theory of mind and pragmatic understanding following right hemisphere damage. Brain and Language, 53, 40–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, E.E. & Jonides, J. (1999). Storage and executive processes in the frontal lobes. Science, 283, 1657–1661.Google Scholar
Troyer, A., Moscovitch, M., Winocur, G., Alexander, M., & Stuss, D. (1998). Clustering and switching on verbal fluency. The effects of focal frontal- and temporal lobe lesions. Neuropsychologia, 36, 499–504.Google Scholar
Wapner, W., Hamby, S., & Gardner, H. (1981). The role of the right hemisphere in the apprehension of complex linguistic materials. Brain and Language, 14, 15–33.Google Scholar
Werner, H. & Kaplan, E. (1950). The acquisition of word meanings: A developmental study. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 15 Serial #51. United Kingdom: Blackwell Publishing.