Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-g7gxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T23:50:29.422Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Representations in learning new faces: Evidence from prosopagnosia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Michael R. Polster  and
Steven Z. Rapcsak
Michael R. Polster
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Victoria University, Wellington, New Zealand
Steven Z. Rapcsak
Affiliation:
Neurology Service, Tucson Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Tucson, Arizona
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We report the performance of a prosopagnosic patient on face learning tasks under different encoding instructions (i.e., levels of processing manipulations). R.J. performs at chance when given no encoding instructions or when given “shallow” encoding instructions to focus on facial features. By contrast, he performs relatively well with “deep” encoding instructions to rate faces in terms of personality traits or when provided with semantic and name information during the study phase. We propose that the improvement associated with deep encoding instructions may be related to the establishment of distinct visually derived and identity-specific semantic codes. The benefit associated with deep encoding in R.J., however, was found to be restricted to the specific view of the face presented at study and did not generalize to other views of the same face. These observations suggest that deep encoding instructions may enhance memory for concrete or pictorial representations of faces in patients with prosopagnosia, but that these patients cannot compensate for the inability to construct abstract structural codes that normally allow faces to be recognized from different orientations. We postulate further that R.J.'s poor performance on face learning tasks may be attributable to excessive reliance on a feature-based left hemisphere face processing system that operates primarily on view-specific representations. (JINS, 1996, 2, 240–248.)

Keywords

ProsopagnosiaFace learningLevels of processing
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 2 , Issue 3 , May 1996 , pp. 240 - 248
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Benton, A.L. (1980). The neuropsychology of face recognition. American Psychologist, 35, 176–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Biber, C., Butters, N., Rosen, J., Gerstman, L., & Mattis, S. (1981). Encoding strategies and recognition of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and other brain-damaged patients. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3(4), 315–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bloom, L.C. & Mudd, S.A. (1993). Depth of processing approach to face recognition: A test of two theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17(3), 556–565.Google Scholar
Bower, G.H. & Karlin, M.B. (1974). Depth of processing pictures of faces and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103, 751–757.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bradshaw, J.L. & Sherlock, D. (1982). Bugs and faces in the two visual fields: The analytic/holistic processing dichotomy and task sequencing. Cortex, 18, 211–226.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V. (1982). Changing faces: Visual and non-visual coding processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 73, 105–116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V. (1983). Recognizing faces. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B302, 423–436.Google ScholarPubMed
Bruce, V. & Young, A. (1986). Understanding face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 77, 305–327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Burton, A.M. (1994). Learning new faces in an interactive activation and competition model. Visual Cognition, 1, 313–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, A.M. & Bruce, V. (1992). I recognise your face but I can't remember your name: A simple explanation? British Journal of Psychology, 83, 45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Craik, F.I.M. & Lockhart, R.S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11, 671–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davidoff, J. & Landis, T. (1990). Recognition of unfamiliar faces in prosopagnosia. Neuropsychologia, 28(11), 1143–1161.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DeRenzi, E. (1986). Current issues on prosopagnosia. In Ellis, H.D., Jeeves, M.A., Newcombe, F., & Young, A. (Eds.), Aspects efface processing (pp. 243–252). Dordrecht: Martinus Nijhoff.Google Scholar
Dricker, J., Butters, N., Berman, G., Samuels, I., & Carey, S. (1978). The recognition and encoding of faces by alcoholic Korsakoff and right hemisphere patients. Neuropsychologia, 16, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, H.D., Shepherd, J.W., & Davies, G.M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: Some implications for theories of face recognition. Perception, 8, 431–439.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ellis, H.D. & Young, A.W. (1988). Training in face-processing skills for a child with acquired prosopagnosia. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 283–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Endo, M., Takhashi, K., & Maruyama, K. (1984). Effects of observer's attitude on the familiarity of faces: Using the difference in cue value between central and peripheral facial elements as an index of familiarity. Tohoku Psychologica Folia, 43, 23–34.Google Scholar
Klatzky, R.L., Martin, G.L., & Kane, R.A. (1982). Semantic interpretation effects on memory for faces. Memory & Cognition, 10(3), 195–206.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Levy, J., Trevarthen, C., & Sperry, R.W. (1972). Perception of bilateral chimeric figures following hemispheric disconnexion. Brain, 95, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Malone, D.R., Morris, H.H., Kay, M.C., & Levin, H.S. (1982). Prosopagnosia: A double dissociation between the recognition of familiar and unfamiliar faces. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery, & Psychiatry, 45, 820–822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McNeil, L. & Warrington, E.K. (1991). Prosopagnosia: A reclassification. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 43A(2), 267–287.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, A.J. & Hayward, C. (1983). The influence of trait and physical-feature-based orienting strategies on aspects of facial memory. British Journal of Psychology, 74, 71–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parkin, A.J. & Williamson, P. (1987). Cerebral lateralization at different stages of facial processing. Cortex, 23, 99–110.Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson, K.E. & Baddeley, A.D. (1977). When face recognition fails. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 3, 406–417.Google ScholarPubMed
Patterson, K. & Bradshaw, J.L. (1975). Differential hemispheric mediation of nonverbal visual stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 2, 246–252.Google Scholar
Rhodes, G. (1985). Lateralised processes in face recognition. British Journal of Psychology, 76, 249–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweich, M. & Bruyer, R. (1993). Heterogeneity in the cognitive manifestations of prosopagnosia: The study of a group of single cases. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 10(6), 529–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sergent, J. (1984). An investigation into component and configural processes underlying face perception. British Journal of Psychology, 75, 221–242.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergent, J. & Signoret, J.-L. (1992). Varieties of functional deficits in prosopagnosia. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 375–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sergent, J. & Villemure, J.G. (1989). Prosopagnosia in a right hemispherectomized patient. Brain, 112, 975–995.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Storer, S.L. (1991). Deep-deeper-deepest? Encoding strategies and the recognition of human faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory & Cognition, 77(2), 323–333.Google Scholar
Warrington, E.K. & Ackroyd, C. (1975). The effect of orienting tasks on recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 3(2), 140–142.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Winograd, E. (1978). Encoding operations which facilitate memory for faces across the life span. In Gruneberg, M.M., Morris, P.E., & Sykes, R.N. (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Winograd, E. (1981). Elaboration and distinctiveness in memory for faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 7, 181–190.Google ScholarPubMed