Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T09:01:04.805Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recall discriminability: Utility of a new CVLT–II measure in the differential diagnosis of dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 October 2005

DEAN C. DELIS ,
SPENCER R. WETTER ,
MARK W. JACOBSON ,
GUERRY PEAVY ,
JOANNE HAMILTON ,
ASSAWIN GONGVATANA ,
JOEL H. KRAMER ,
MARK W. BONDI ,
JODY COREY-BLOOM  and
DAVID P. SALMON
DEAN C. DELIS
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
SPENCER R. WETTER
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California
MARK W. JACOBSON
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
GUERRY PEAVY
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
JOANNE HAMILTON
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
ASSAWIN GONGVATANA
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California San Diego State University, San Diego, California
JOEL H. KRAMER
Affiliation:
University of California, San Francisco Medical Center, San Francisco, California
MARK W. BONDI
Affiliation:
Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System, San Diego, California University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
JODY COREY-BLOOM
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
DAVID P. SALMON
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego School of Medicine, San Diego, California
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Memory tests that are in a recall format have almost universally measured accuracy in terms of the number of target items reported by the examinee. However, this traditional scoring method can, in certain cases, result in artificially inflated memory accuracy scores. That is, just as a “yes” response bias and high false-positive rate on recognition testing can artificially inflate a patient's hit rate, so, too, a liberal response bias and high intrusion rate on recall testing can artificially inflate a patient's level of target recall. Recognition tests correct for this problem by using a discriminability measure that provides a single score of hit rate relative to false-positive rate; however, recall tests rarely provide a single score of recall accuracy that corrects for intrusion rate. In the present study, we examined the utility of a new recall discriminability measure that analyzes target recall relative to intrusion rate. Patients with Alzheimer's disease (AD) or Huntington's disease (HD) were administered the CVLT–II, which provides both the traditional measure of target recall and a new measure of recall discriminability. The results indicate that the new recall discriminability measure was superior to the traditional level of target recall measure in distinguishing the recall performance of AD and HD patients. Implications of these results for clinical practice and theories of memory disorder in dementia are discussed. (JINS, 2005, 11, 708–715.)

Keywords

MemoryAssessmentRecognition discriminabilityAlzheimer's diseaseHuntington's disease
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 6 , October 2005 , pp. 708 - 715
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barrett, A.M., Crucian, G.P., Schwartz, R.L., & Heilman, K.M. (2000). Testing memory for self-generated items in dementia: Method makes a difference. Neurology, 54, 1258–1264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, N., Delis, D.C., & Lucas, J. (1995). Clinical assessment of memory disorders in amnesia and dementia. Annual Review of Psychology, 46, 493–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Butters, N., Wolfe, J., Martone, M., Granholm, E., & Cermak., L.S. (1985). Memory disorders associated with Huntington's disease: Verbal recall, verbal recognition, and procedural memory. Neuropsychologia, 23, 729–743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cermak, L.S. & Stiassny, D. (1982). Recall failure following successful generation and recognition of responses by alcoholic Korsakoff patients. Brain and Cognition, 1, 165–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corwin, J. (1994). On measuring discrimination and response bias: Unequal numbers of targets and and distractors and two classes of distractors. Neuropsychology, 8, 110–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dalla Barba, G. (1993). Different patterns of confabulation. Cortex, 29, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (1987). The California Verbal Learning Test. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Delis, D.C., Massman, P.J., Butters, N., Salmon, D.P., Cermak, L.S., & Kramer, J.H. (1991). Profiles of demented and amnesic patients on the California Verbal Learning Test: Implications for the assessment of memory disorders. Psychological Assessment: A Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 3, 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, D.C. & Fridlund, A.J. (2000). CVLT-II Comprehensive Scoring System and Computerized Report. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
Delis, D.C., Kramer, J.H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B.A. (2000). California Verbal Learning Test–II, Second Edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.
DeLuca, J. (1993). Predicting neurobehavioral patterns following anterior communicating artery aneurysm. Cortex, 29, 639–647.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deweer, B., Ergis, A.M., Fossati, P., Pillon, B., Boller, F., Agid, Y., & Dubois, B. (1994). Explicit memory, procedural learning and lexical priming in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 30, 113–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, R.S., Alexander, M.P., D'Esposito, M.D., & Otto, R. (1995). Neuropsychological and neuroanatomical correlates of confabulation. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 17, 20–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuld, P.A., Katzman, R., Davies, P., & Terry, R.D. (1982). Intrusions as a sign of Alzheimer dementia: Chemical and pathological verification. Annals of Neurology, 11, 155–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glosser, G., Deutsch, G.K., Cole, L.C., Corwin, J., & Saykin, A.J. (1998). Differential lateralization of memory discrimination and response bias in temporal lobe epilepsy patients. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 4, 502–511.Google Scholar
Jacobs, D., Salmon, D.P., Tröster, A.I., & Butters, N. (1990). Intrusion errors in the figural memory of patients with Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 5, 49–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kramer, J.H., Delis, D.C., Blusewicz, M.J., Brandt, J., Ober, B.A., & Strauss, M. (1988). Verbal memory errors in Alzheimer's and Huntington's dementias. Developmental Neuropsychology, 4, 1–5.Google Scholar
Macmillan, N.A. & Creelman, D.C. (1991). Detection Theory: A User's Guide. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Massman, P.J., Delis, D.C., Butters, N., Dupont, R.M., & Gillin, J.C. (1993). The subcortical dysfunction hypothesis of memory deficits in depression: Neuropsychological validation in a subgroup of patients. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 14, 687–706.Google Scholar
Mattis, S. (1988). Dementia Rating Scale: Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources Inc.
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlin, E.M. (1984). Clinical diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of the Department of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's Disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rey, A. (1964). L'examen clinique en psychologie [The clinical examination in psychology]. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
Rouleau, I., Imbault, H., Laframboise, M., & Bédard, M.A. (2001). Pattern of intrusions in verbal recall: Comparison of Alzheimer's disease, Parkinson's disease, and frontal lobe dementia. Brain and Cognition, 46, 244–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sandson, J. & Albert, M.L. (1987). Perseveration in behavioral neurology. Neurology, 37, 1736–1741.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schnider, A., von Daniken, C., & Gutbrod, K. (1996). The mechanisms of spontaneous and provoked confabulations. Brain, 119, 1365–1375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shear, P.K., Tallal, P., & Delis, D.C. (1992). Verbal learning and memory in language impaired children. Neuropsychologia, 30, 451–458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J.G. & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 117, 34–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spreen, O. & Strauss, E. (1998). A Compendium of Neuropsychological Tests. New York: Oxford University Press.
Wechsler, D. (1987). Wechsler Memory Scale—Revised. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.