Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-g8jcs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T07:06:18.027Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Processing efficiency and sustained attention in bipolar disorder

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 January 2005

DAVID E. FLECK ,
PAULA K. SHEAR  and
STEPHEN M. STRAKOWSKI
DAVID E. FLECK
Affiliation:
Center for Bipolar Disorders Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati
PAULA K. SHEAR
Affiliation:
Center for Bipolar Disorders Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
STEPHEN M. STRAKOWSKI
Affiliation:
Center for Bipolar Disorders Research, Department of Psychiatry, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati Department of Psychology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We hypothesized that patterns of sustained attention performance in bipolar disorder were consistent with processing efficiency theory—a theory of the relationship between central processing capacity and performance. We predicted (1) sustained attention deficits during mania because symptoms interfere with limited-capacity executive control processes resulting in decreased performance effectiveness; and (2) decreased processing efficiency during euthymia, as indicated by speed/accuracy tradeoffs, consistent with a stable phenotypic abnormality. Twenty-five manic bipolar, 23 euthymic bipolar, and 28 healthy comparison participants were compared on a continuous performance task and administered symptom-rating scales. The manic group was significantly impaired on overall perceptual sensitivity and demonstrated a significant linear decrease in performance over time, consistent with impaired sustained attention. The euthymic group evidenced significantly slower overall hit reaction time (RT), but when RT was controlled they performed similarly to the healthy group over time. Two discriminant functions combined to separate the groups on manic symptom severity and on-task effort/strategy use. These findings are consistent with processing efficiency theory. They suggest that euthymic patients sustain attention through effortful control at the expense of processing efficiency, while acute mania reduces the capacity for control and impairs sustained attention. Problems with processing efficiency are viewed as trait characteristics of bipolar disorder that may be overlooked by traditional error-based assessments. (JINS, 2005, 11, 49–57.)

Keywords

Bipolar disorderManiaProcessing efficiency theorySustained attentionContinuous performance test
Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 11 , Issue 1 , January 2005 , pp. 49 - 57
Copyright
© 2005 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ackenheil, M. (2001). Neurotransmitters and signal transduction processes in bipolar affective disorders: A synopsis. Journal of Affective Disorders, 62, 101–111.Google Scholar
Addington, J. & Addington, D. (1997). Attentional vulnerability indicators in schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 23, 197–204.Google Scholar
Adler, C.M., Sax, K.W., Holland, S.K., Schmithorst, V., Rosenberg, L., & Strakowski, S.M. (2001). Changes in neuronal activation with increasing attentional demand in healthy volunteers: An fMRI study. Synapse, 42, 266–272.Google Scholar
Altshuler, L., Curran, J.G., Hauser, P., Mintz, J., Denicoff, K., & Post, R. (1995). T2 hyperintensities in bipolar disorder: Magnetic resonance imaging comparison and literature meta-analysis. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 1139–1144.Google Scholar
Andreasen, N.C. (1984). Scale for the Assessment of Positive Symptoms (SAPS). Iowa City, IA: The University of Iowa.
Aylward, E.H., Roberts-Twillie, J.V., Barta, P.E., Kumar, A.J., Harris, G.L., Geer, M., Peyser, C.E., & Pearlson, G.D. (1994). Basal ganglia volumes and white matter hyperintensities in patients with bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 151, 687–693.Google Scholar
Bearden, C.E., Hoffman, K.M., & Cannon, T.D. (2001). The neuropsychology and neuroanatomy of bipolar affective disorder: A critical review. Bipolar Disorders, 3, 106–150.Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W. & Robertson, I.H. (2002). Principles of the rehabilitation of frontal lobe function. In D.T. Stuss & R.T. Knight (Eds.), Principles of frontal lobe function, (pp. 557–572). New York: Oxford University Press.
Corkum, P.V. & Siegel, L.S. (1993). Is the continuous performance task a valuable research tool for use with children with attention-deficit-hyperactivity disorder? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 34, 1217–1239.Google Scholar
Eysenck, M.W. & Calvo, M.G. (1992). Anxiety and performance: The processing efficiency theory. Cognition and Emotion, 6, 409–434.Google Scholar
First, M.G., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., & Williams, J.B.W. (1997). Structured Clinical Interview for DSM–IV Axis I Disorders—Patient Edition (SCID-I/P). NY: Biometrics Research Department, New York State Psychiatric Institute.
Fleck, D.E., Sax, K.W., & Strakowski, S.M. (2001). Reaction time measures of sustained attention differentiate bipolar disorder from schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 52, 251–259.Google Scholar
Fleck, D.E., Shear, P.K., Zimmerman, M.E., Getz, G.E., Corey, K.B., Jak, A., Lebowitz, B.K., & Strakowski, S.M. (2003). Verbal memory in mania: Effects of clinical state and task requirements. Bipolar Disorders, 5, 375–380.Google Scholar
Hager, F., Volz, H.P., Gaser, C., Mentzel, H.J., Kaiser, W.A., & Sauer, H. (1998). Challenging the anterior attentional system with a continuous performance task: A functional magnetic resonance imaging approach. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 248, 161–170.Google Scholar
Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–61.Google Scholar
Huynh, H. & Feldt, L.S. (1976). Estimation of the Box correction for degrees of freedom from sample data in randomized block and split-plot designs. Journal of Educational Statistics, 1, 69–82.Google Scholar
Levene, H. (1960). Robust tests for equality of variances. In I. Olkins (Ed.), Contributions to probability and statistics (pp. 278–292). Stanford, California: Stanford University Press.
Lichter, D.G. & Cummings, J.L. (2001). Introduction and overview. In D.G. Lichter & J.L. Cummings (Eds.), Frontal-subcortical circuits in psychiatric and neurological disorders (pp. 1–43). New York: The Guilford Press.
Liu, S.K., Chiu, C.-H., Chang, C.-J., Hwang, T.-J., Hwu, H.-G., & Chen, W.J. (2002). Deficits in sustained attention in schizophrenia and affective disorders: Stable versus state-dependent markers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 975–982.Google Scholar
Mauchly, J.W. (1940). Significance test for sphericity of a normal n-variate distribution. Annals of Mathematical Statistics, 11, 204–209.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, K.H. (1991). Vigilance in schizophrenia and related disorders. In S.R. Steinhauer, J.H. Gruzelier, & J. Zubin (Eds.), Handbook of schizophrenia, Vol. 5: Neuropsychology, psychophysiology, and information processing (pp. 397–433). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Nuechterlein, K.H. & Asarnow, R.F. (1993). Directions for Use of the UCLA Continuous Performance Test (CPT) Program for IBM and Fully Compatible Microcomputers, Version 6.02 for Degraded-Stimulus CPT and Conventional “0” CPT [Computer manual]. Los Angeles, CA.
Nuechterlein, K.H., Dawson, M.E., Ventura, J., Miklowitz, D., & Konishi, G. (1991). Information processing anomalies in the early course of schizophrenia and bipolar disorder. Schizophrenia Research, 5, 195–196.Google Scholar
Nuechterlein, K.H., Parasuraman, R., & Jiang, Q. (1983). Visual sustained attention: Image degradation produces rapid sensitivity decrement over time. Science, 220, 327.Google Scholar
Pachella, R.G. (1974). The interpretation of reaction time in information processing research. In B. Kantowitz (Ed.), Human information processing: Tutorials in performance and cognition (pp. 41–82). New York: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Pies, R.W. (1998). Handbook of essential psychopharmacology. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Press.
Riccio, C.A., Reynolds, C.R., Lowe, P., & Moore, J.J. (2002). The continuous performance test: A window on the neural substrates of attention? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 235–272.Google Scholar
Sax, K.W., Strakowski, S.M., McElroy, S.L., Keck, P.E.Jr., & West, S.A. (1995). Attention and formal thought disorder in mixed and pure mania. Biological Psychiatry, 37, 420–423.Google Scholar
Sax, K.W., Strakowski, S.M., Zimmerman, M.E., DelBello, M.P., Keck, P.E.Jr., & Hawkins, J.M. (1999). Frontosubcortical neuroanatomy and the continuous performance test in mania. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 139–141.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., Adler, C.M., & DelBello, M.P. (2002a). Volumetric MRI studies of mood disorders: Do they distinguish unipolar and bipolar disorder? Bipolar Disorders, 4, 80–88.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., DelBello, M.P., Zimmerman, M.E., Getz, G.E., Mills, N.P., Ret, J., Shear, P.K., & Adler, C.M. (2002b). Ventricular and Periventricular structural volumes in first- versus multiple-episode bipolar disorder. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1841–1847.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., Adler, C.M., Holland, S.K., Mills, N.P., & DelBello, M.P. (2004). A preliminary FMRI study of sustained attention in euthymic, unmedicated bipolar disorder. Neuropsychopharmacology, 29, 1734–1740.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., DelBello, M.P., Sax, K.W., Zimmerman, M.E., Shear, P.K., Hawkins, J.M., & Larson, E.R. (1999). Brain magnetic resonance imaging of structural abnormalities in bipolar disorder. Archives of General Psychiatry, 56, 254–260.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., Wilson, D.R., Tohen, M., Woods, B.T., Douglass, A.W., & Stoll, A.L. (1993a). Structural brain abnormalities in first-episode mania. Biological Psychiatry, 33, 602–609.Google Scholar
Strakowski, S.M., Woods, B.T., Tohen, M., Wilson, D.R., Douglass, A.W., & Stoll, A.L. (1993b). MRI signal hyperintensities in mania at first hospitalization. Biological Psychiatry, 33, 204–206.Google Scholar
Strauss, M.E., Prescott, C.A., Gutterman, D.F., & Tune, L.E. (1987). Span of apprehension deficits in schizophrenia and mania. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 13, 699.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T. & Benson, D.F. (1984). Neuropsychological studies of the frontal lobes. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 3–28.Google Scholar
Stuss, D.T. & Benson, D.F. (1986). The frontal lobes. New York: Raven Press.
Swayze, V.W., Andreasen, N.C., Alliger, R.J., Ehrhardt, J.C., & Yuh, W.T.C. (1990). Structural brain abnormalities in bipolar affective disorder: Ventricular enlargement and focal signal hyperintensities. Archives of General Psychiatry, 47, 1054–1059.Google Scholar
Tabachnick, B.G. & Fidell, L.S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, Massachusetts: Allyn and Bacon.
Tellegen, A. (1965). The performance of chronic seizure patients on the General Aptitude Battery. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 180–184.Google Scholar
Wilder-Willis, K.E., Sax, K.W., Rosenberg, H.L., Fleck, D.E., Shear, P.K., & Strakowski, S.M. (2001). Persistent attentional dysfunction in remitted bipolar disorder. Bipolar Disorders, 3, 58–62.Google Scholar
Yamasaki, H., LaBar, K.S., & McCarthy, G. (2002). Dissociable prefrontal brain systems for attention and emotion. PNAS, 99, 11447–11451.Google Scholar
Young, R.C., Biggs, J.T., Ziegler, V.E., & Meyer, D.A. (1978). A rating scale for mania: Reliability, validity, and sensitivity. British Journal of Psychiatry, 133, 429–435.Google Scholar