Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:35:03.406Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Neuropsychological interventions for memory impairment and the role of single-case design methodologies

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 July 2009

CATHERINE A. MATEER
CATHERINE A. MATEER*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests to: Catherine A. Mateer, Department of Psychology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada V8W 3P5. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Neurobehavioral Grand Rounds—Introduction
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , July 2009 , pp. 623 - 628
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Anderson, C.M. & Kim, C. (2003). Evaluating treatment efficacy with single-case designs. In Roberts, M.C. & Hardi, S.S. (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in clinical psychology, pp. 73–91. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
Barlow, D.H. & Herson, M. (1984). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behaviour change (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
Chambless, D.L. & Hollon, S.D. (1998). Defining empirically supported therapies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66(1), 7–18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
DePompei, R., Gillette, Y., Goetz, E., Xenopoulos-Oddsson, A., Bryen, D., & Dowds, M. (2008). Practical applications for use of PDAs and smartphones with children and adolescents who have traumatic brain injury. NeuroRehabilitation, 23, 487–499.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J.J., Wilson, B.A., Schuri, U., Andrade, J., Baddeley, A., Bruna, O., Canavan, T., Della Sala, S., Green, R., Laaksonen, R., Lorenzi, L., & Taussik, I. (2000). A comparison of “errorless” and “trial-and-error” learning methods for teaching individuals with acquired memory deficits. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 67–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guyatt, G.H., Keller, J.L., Jaeschke, R.Rosenbloom, D., Adachi, J.D., & Newhouse, M.T. (1990). The n-of-1 randomized controlled trial: Clinical usefulness. Our three year experience. Annals of Internal Medicine, 112, 293–299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hersen, M. & Barlow, D.H. (1976). Single case experimental designs: Strategies for studying behaviour change. New York: Pergamon.Google Scholar
Kazdin, A.E. (2003). The case study and single-case designs. In Kazdin, A.E. (Ed.), Research design in clinical psychology (4th ed., pp. 265–299). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
Kennedy, M.R.T. & Turkstra, L. (2006). Group intervention studies in cognitive rehabilitation of individuals with traumatic brain injury: Challenges faced by researchers. Neuropsychology Review, 16, 151–159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moher, D., Schulz, K.F., & Altman, D.G. (2001). The CONSORT statement: Revised recommendations for improving the quality of reports of parallel-group randomized trials. Lancet, 357, 1191–1194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O’Connell, M.E., Mateer, C.A., & Kerns, K.A. (2003). Prosthetic systems for addressing problems with initiation: Guidelines for selection, training, and measuring efficacy. NeuroRehabilitation, 18, 9–20.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perdices, M., Schultz, R., Tate, R.L., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Savage, S., Winders, K., & Smith, K. (2006). The evidence base of neuropsychological rehabilitation in acquired brain impairment: How good is the research? Brain Impairment, 7, 119–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robey, R.R., Schultz, M.C., Crawford, A.B., & Sinner, C.A. (1999). Single-subject clinical-outcome research: Designs, data, effect sizes, and analyses. Aphasiology, 13, 445–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schulz, K.F., Chalmers, I., Hayes, R.J., & Altman, D.G. (1995). Empirical evidence of bias: Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. The Journal of the American Medical Association, 273(5), 408–412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sohlberg, M.M., Kennedy, M.R.T., Avery, J., Coelho, C., Turkstra, L., Ylvisaker, M., & Yorkston, K. (2007). Evidence based practice for the use of external memory aids as a memory rehabilitation technique. Journal of Medical Speech Language Pathology, 15(1), xv–1i.Google Scholar
Sohlberg, M.M. & Mateer, C.A. (2001). Cognitive rehabilitation: An integrative neuropsychological approach. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar
Svoboda, E. & Richards, B. (2009, this issue). Compensating for anterograde amnesia: A new training method that capitalizes on emerging smartphone technologies. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 15, 629–638.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tate, R.L., McDonald, S., Perdices, M., Togher, L., Schultz, R., & Savage, S. (2008). Rating the methodological quality of single-subject designs and n-of-1 trials: Introducing the Single-Case Experimental Design (SCED) Scale. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 18(4), 385–401.Google Scholar
Tate, R.L., McDonald, S., Togher, L., Perdices, M., & Moseley, A. (2004). Rating the methodological quality of single-case experimental designs: The PsycBITE Scale. Brain Impairment, 5(Suppl 1), 165.Google Scholar
Wilson, B.A. (1991). Long-term prognosis of patients with severe memory disorders. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 1(2), 117–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B.A. (2003). Rehabilitaion of memory deficits. In Wilson, B.A. (Ed.), Neuropsychological rehabilitation: Theory and practice, pp. 71–88. Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, B.A. (in press). Memory rehabilitation. New York: Guilford.Google Scholar