Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T23:40:40.623Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The naming impairment of living and nonliving items in Alzheimer's disease

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 February 2009

Patricia Montanes ,
Marie Claire Goldblum  and
Francois Boller
Patricia Montanes
Affiliation:
U.324 INSERM, 75014 Paris, France Instituto Neurologico, Bogotá, Colombia
Marie Claire Goldblum
Affiliation:
U.324 INSERM, 75014 Paris, France
Francois Boller
Affiliation:
U.324 INSERM, 75014 Paris, France
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Several studies of semantic abilities in Dementia of the Alzheimer Type (DAT) suggest that their semantic disorders may affect specific categories of knowledge. In particular, the existence of a category-specific semantic impairment affecting, selectively, living things has frequently been reported in association with DAT. We report here results from two naming tasks of 25 DAT patients and two subgroups within this population. The first naming task used 48 black and white line drawings from Snodgrass and Vanderwart (1980) which controlled the visual complexity of stimuli from living and nonliving categories. The second task used 44 colored pictures (to assess the influence of word frequency in living vs. nonliving categories). Within the set of black and white pictures, both DAT patients and controls obtained significantly lower scores on high visual complexity stimuli than on stimuli of low visual complexity. A clear effect of semantic category emerged for DAT patients and controls, with a lower performance on the living category. Within the colored set, pictures corresponding to high frequency words gave rise to significantly higher scores than pictures corresponding to low frequency words. No significant difference emerged between living versus nonliving categories, either in DAT patients or in controls. In the two tasks, the two subgroups of DAT patients presented a different profile of performance and error type. As color constitutes the main difference between the two sets of pictures, our results point to the relevance of this cue in the processing of semantic information, with visual complexity and frequency also being very relevant. (JINS, 1995, I, 39–48.)

Keywords

Alzheimer's diseaseDementiaNamingSemantic memory
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 1 , Issue 1 , January 1995 , pp. 39 - 48
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basso, A., Capitani, E., & Laiacona, M. (1988). Progressive language impairment without dementia: A case study with isolated category-specific semantic defect. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 51, 1201–1207.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bayles, K. & Tomoeda, C. (1983). Confrontation naming impairment in dementia. Brain and Language, 19, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Caramazza, A., Hillis, A., Leek, E., & Miozzo, M. (in press). The organization of lexical knowledge in the brain: Evidence from category and modality-specific deficits. In Hirsch-feld, L. & Gelman, S. (Eds.), Domain specificity in cognition and culture. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Chanoine, V. (1992). Etude des troubles de la memoire seman-tique dans deux cas d'anomie progressive isolee. DEA de Neuropsychologie, Paris.Google Scholar
Chertkow, H. & Bub, D. (1990). Semantic memory loss in dementia of the Alzheimer type: What do various measures measure? Brain, 113, 397–417.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chertkow, H., Bub, D., & Caplan, D. (1992a). Categories of Knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and non-living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(2), 135–153.Google Scholar
Chertkow, H., Bub, D., & Caplan, D. (1992b). Constraining theories of semantic memory processing: Evidence from dementia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9(4), 327–365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CNRS (1984). Dictionnaire des Fréquences. Institut National de La Langue Française.Google Scholar
Content, A., Mousty, P., & Radeau, M. (1990). Brulex: Une base de données lexicales informatisées pour le Français écrit et parlé. Année Psychologique, 90, 551–566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cummings, J. & Benson, D. (1992). Dementia: A Clinical Approach (2nd ed.). Boston: Butterworths.Google Scholar
Damasio, A. (1990). Category related recognition effects as a clue to the neural substrates of knowledge. Trends in Neurosciences, 13, 95–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diesfeldt, H. (1989). Semantic impairment in senile dementia of the Alzheimer type. Aphasiology, 3(1), 41–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farah, M., Hammond, K., Mehta, Z., & Ratclif, G. (1989). Category-specificity and modality specificity in semantic memory. Neuropsychologia, 27(2), 193–200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, M. & McClelland, J. (1991). A computational model of semantic memory impairment: Modality specificity and emergent category-specificity, Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 339–357.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Farah, M., Mc Mullen, P., & Meyer, M. (1991). Can recognition of living things be selectively impaired? Neuropsychologia, 29(2), 185–193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Funnell, E. & Sheridan, J. (1992). Categories of Knowledge? Unfamiliar aspects of living and non-living things. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 9, 135–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gainotti, G. (1993). Mechanisms underlying semantic-lexical disorders in Alzheimer's disease. In Boller, F. & Grafman, H. (Eds.), Handbook of Neuropsychology (Vol. 5, pp. 281–292). New York: Elsevier Science.Google Scholar
Goldstein, F., Green, J., Presley, R., & Green, R. (1992). Dysnomia in Alzheimer's disease: An evaluation of neurobehavioral subtypes. Brain and Language, 43, 308–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, J., Berndt, R., & Caramazza, A. (1985). Category-specific naming deficit following cerebral infarction. Nature, 316, 439–440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hart, J. & Gordon, B. (1992). Neural subsystems for object knowledge. Nature, 359, 60–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, A. & Caramazza, A. (1991). Category specific naming and comprehension impairment: A double dissociation. Brain, 114, 2081–2094.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillis, A., Rapp, B., Romani, C., & Caramazza, A. (1990). Selective impairment of semantics in lexical processing. Cognitive Neurospychology, 7(3), 191–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hodges, J., Salmon, D., & Butters, N. (1991). The nature of the naming deficit in Alzheimer's and Huntington's disease. Brain, 114, 1547–1558.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hodges, J., Salmon, D., & Butters, N. (1992). Semantic memory impairment in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 30(4), 301–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Humphreys, G. & Riddoch, J. (1987). On telling your fruits from your vegetables: A consideration of category-specific deficits after brain damage. Trends in Neuroscience, 10(4), 145–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Humphreys, G., Riddoch, J., & Quinlan, P. (1990). Cascade processes in picture identification. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(1), 67–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Job, R., Miozzo, M., & Sartori, G. (1993). On the existence of category-specific impairments. A reply to Parkin & Stewart. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 511–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marin, O., Glenn, C., & Rafal, R. (1983). Visual problem solving in the absence of lexical semantics: Evidence from dementia. Brain and Cognition, 2, 285–311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A. (1987). Representation of semantic and spatial knowledge in Alzheimer's patients: Implications for models of preserved learning in amnesia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 9, 191–224.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Martin, A. (1988). The search for the neuropsychological profile of a disease state: A mistaken enterprise? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 10, 22–23.Google Scholar
Martin, A., Brouwers, P., Lalonde, F., Cox, C., & Fedio, P. (1987). Alzheimer's patients subgroups: Qualitatively distinct patterns of performance and subsequent decline. Cambridge, MA: Center for Brain Sciences and Metabolism Charitable Trust.Google Scholar
Martin, A. & Fedio, P. (1983). Word Production and comprehension in Alzheimer's disease: The breakdown of semantic knowledge. Brain and Language, 19, 124–141.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCarthy, R. & Warrington, E. (1988). Evidence for modality specific meaning systems in the brain. Nature, 334, 428–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKenna, P. & Warrington, E.K. (1978). Category specific naming preservation: A single case study. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 41, 571–574.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McKhann, G., Drachman, D., Folstein, M., Katzman, R., Price, D., & Stadlan, E. (1984). Clinical Diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: Report of the NINCDS-ADRDA work group under the auspices of Health and Human Services Task Force on Alzheimer's disease. Neurology, 34, 939–944.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nebes, R. (1992). Cognitive Dysfunction in Alzheimer's Disease. In Craik, C. & Salthouse, T. (Eds.), The Handbook of Aging and Cognition (pp. 373–445). New Jersey: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Nebes, R., Brady, C., & Huff, F. (1989). Automatic and attentional mechanisms of semantic priming in Alzheimer's Disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 11, 219–230.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nebes, R., Martin, D., & Horn, L. (1984). Sparing of semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 93, 321–330.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Osterrieth, P. (1944). Le test de copie d'une figure complexe. Archives de Psychologie, 30, 206–356.Google Scholar
Pietrini, V., Nertempi, P., Vaglia, A., Revello, M.G., Pinna, V. & Ferrero Milone, F. (1988). Recovery from herpes simplex encephalitis: Selective impairment of specific semantic categories with neuroradiological correlation. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 51, 1284–1293.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reisberg, B., Ferris, S., De Leon, M., & Crook, T. (1982). Brief Cognitive Rating Scale. American Journal of Psychiatry, 139, 1136–1139.Google Scholar
Sacchett, C. & Humphreys, S. (1992). Calling a squirrel a squirrel but a canoe a wigwam: A category-specific deficit for artefactual objects and body parts. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 4(2), 131–185.Google Scholar
Sartori, G., Coltheart, M., Miozzo, M., & Job, R. (in press). Category-specificity and informational specificity in neuropsychological impairment of semantic memory. In: Umiltϡ, C.A. & Moscovich, M. (eds.) Attention and Performance (Vol. XV, pp. 537–550). Bradford: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Sartori, G. & Job, R. (1988). The oyster with four legs: A neuropsychological study on the interaction of visual and semantic information. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5(1), 105–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G., Job, R., Miozzo, M., Zago, S., & Marchiori, G. (1993a). Category-specific form knowledge deficit in a patient with Herpes Simplex Virus Encephalitis. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2, 280–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sartori, G., Miozzo, M., & Job, R. (1993b). Category-specific naming impairments? Yes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 46A, 489–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, M. (1990). Modular deficits in Alzheimer-Type dementia. Bradford: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Schwartz, M., Marin, O., & Saffran, E. (1979). Dissociation of language function in dementia: A case study. Brain and Language, 7, 277–306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sheridan, J. & Humphreys, G. (1993). A verbal semantic category-specific recognition impairment. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2, 143–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silveri, M., Daniele, A., Giustolisi, L., & Gainotti, G. (1991). Dissociation between knowledge of living and non-living things in dementia of the Alzheimer type. Neurology, 41, 545–546.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Snodgrass, J. & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174–215.Google ScholarPubMed
Stewart, F., Parkin, A., & Hinkin, N. (1992). Naming impairments following recovery from Herpes Simplex Encephalitis. Category-specific? Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44(2), 261–284.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. (1975). The selective impairment of semantic memory. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 27, 633–637.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. & Shallice, T. (1984). Category-specific semantic impairment. Brain, 107, 829–854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warrington, E. & McCarthy, R. (1983). Category-specific access dysphasia. Brain, 106, 859–878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warrington, E. & McCarthy, R. (1987). Categories of knowledge: Further fractionation and a further integration. Brain, 110, 1267–1308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1955). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. New York: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar