Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T18:56:09.412Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Metamemory in Temporal Lobe Epilepsy: A Study of Sensitivity to Repetition at Encoding

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2013

Charlotte E. Howard*
Affiliation:
Oxford Outcomes Ltd., an ICON plc company, Oxford, United Kingdom
Pilar Andrés
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of the Balearic Islands, Spain
Giuliana Mazzoni
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Hull, United Kingdom
*
Correspondence and reprint requests to: Charlotte E. Howard, Oxford Outcomes Ltd, Seacourt Tower, West Way, Oxford, OX2 0JJ, United Kingdom. E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract

The purpose of the current study was to determine whether the level of metacognitive sensitivity previously observed in global Judgments-of-Learning (JOLs) in temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) patients could also be established when making item-by-item JOLs. Fourteen TLE patients and 14 control participants were compared on a memory task where 39 semantically unrelated word pairs were presented at three different levels of repetition. Thirteen word pairs were assigned to each level. A combined JOL and Feeling-of-Knowing (FOK) task was used to examine metamemory monitoring and control processes. The results showed that control participants outperformed TLE patients on recall and recognition. However, both groups were sensitive to repetition of the word pairs throughout the list, revealing intact online monitoring and control processes at encoding. These results are consistent with the findings of Howard et al. (2010) of intact metamemory in TLE patients and extend the findings of Andrés et al. (2010) of metamemory sensitivity from the global level to the item-by-item level. Finally, the current findings provide additional evidence of a dissociation between memory and metamemory in TLE patients. (JINS, 2013, 19, 1–10)

Type
Research Articles
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Andrés, P., Mazzoni, G., Howard, C.E. (2010). Preserved monitoring and control processes in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychology, 24, 775786.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baños, J.H., LaGory, J., Sawrie, S., Faught, E., Knowlton, R., Prasad, A., Martin, R. (2004). Self-report of cognitive abilities in temporal lobe epilepsy: Cognitive, psychosocial, and emotional factors. Epilepsy & Behavior, 5, 575579.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, B.D., Giovagnoli, A.R. (2007). Recent innovative studies of memory in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychological Review, 17, 455476.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bell, B., Lin, J., Seidenberg, M., Hermann, B. (2011). The neurobiology of cognitive disorders in temporal lobe epilepsy. Nature Reviews. Neurology, 7, 154164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benjamin, A.S., Díaz, M. (2008). Measurement of relative metamnemonic accuracy. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 7394). New York: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Burgess, P.W., Shallice, T. (1997). Hayling and Brixton tests. London: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Connor, L.T., Dunlosky, J., Hertzog, C. (1997). Age-related differences in absolute but not relative metamemory accuracy. Psychology and Aging, 12, 5071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delis, D.C., Kaplan, E., Kramer, J.H. (2001). Delis-Kaplan Executive Function System: Examiner's manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Elixhauser, A., Leidy, N.K., Meador, K., Means, E., Willian, M.K. (1999). The relationship between memory performance, perceived cognitive functioning, and mood in patients with epilepsy. Epilepsy Research, 37, 1324.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, A.J. (1974). Harris test of lateral dominance. New York: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Howard, C.E., Andrés, P., Broks, P., Noad, R., Sadler, M., Coker, D., Mazzoni, G. (2010). Memory, metamemory and their dissociation in temporal lobe epilepsy. Neuropsychologia, 48, 921932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Janowsky, J.S., Shimamura, A.P., Squire, L.R. (1989). Memory and metamemory: Comparisons between frontal lobe lesions and amnesic patients. Psychobiology, 17, 311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Koriat, A., Ackerman, R., Lockl, K., Wolfgang, S. (2009). The memorizing effort heuristic in judgements of learning: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 102, 265279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lin, J., Salamon, N., Lee, A., Dutton, R., Geaga, J., Hayashi, K., Thompson, P. (2007). Reduced neocortical thickness and complexity mapped in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis. Cerebral Cortex, 17, 20072018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mazzoni, G., Nelson, T.O. (1995). Judgements of learning are affected by the kind of encoding in ways that cannot be attributed to the level of recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 12631274.Google Scholar
Moulin, C.J.A. (2002). Sense and sensitivity: Metacognition in Alzheimer's disease. In T. J. Perfect & B. L. Schwartz (Eds.), Applied metacognition (pp. 197223). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulin, C.J.A., Perfect, T.J., Jones, R.W. (2000a). Global predictions of memory in Alzheimer's disease: Evidence for preserved metamemory monitoring. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 7, 230244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Moulin, C.J.A., Perfect, T.J., Jones, R.W. (2000b). The effects of repetition on allocation of study time and judgements of learning in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 38, 748756.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T.O. (1984). A comparison of current measures of the accuracy of feeling-of-knowing predictions. Psychological Bulletin, 95, 109133.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nelson, T., Leonesio, R. (1988). Allocation of self-paced study time and the “labor-in-vain effect”. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 14, 676686.Google ScholarPubMed
Nelson, H.E., Willison, J. (1991). Restandardisation of the NART against the WAIS-R. In H. E. Nelson (2nd ed.), National Adult Reading Test (NART). Test manual (pp. 1323). Windsor: Nelson.Google Scholar
Prevey, M.L., Delaney, R.C., Mattson, R.H. (1988). Metamemory in temporal lobe epilepsy: Self-monitoring of memory functions. Brain and Cognition, 7, 298311.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Prevey, M.L., Delaney, R.C., Mattson, R.H., Tice, D.M. (1991). Feeling-of-knowing in temporal lobe epilepsy: Monitoring knowledge inaccessible to conscious recall. Cortex, 27, 8192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rubin, D.C., Friendly, M. (1986). Predicting which words get recalled: Measures of free recall, availability, goodness, emotionality, and pronunciability for 925 nouns. Memory & Cognition, 14, 7994.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shimamura, A.P., Squire, L.R. (1986). Memory and metamemory: A study of feeling-of-knowing phenomenon in amnesic patients. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition, 12, 452460.Google ScholarPubMed
Souchay, C. (2007). Metamemory in Alzheimer's disease. Cortex, 43, 9871003.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Souchay, C., Isingrini, M., Gil, R. (2006). Metamemory monitoring and Parkinson's disease. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 618630.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Vermeulen, J., Aldenkamp, A.P., Alpherts, W.C. (1993). Memory complaints in epilepsy: Correlations with cognitive performance and neuroticism. Epilepsy Research, 15, 157170.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997a). Manual for the Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale-third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Wechsler, D. (1997b). Manual for the Wechsler Memory Scale-third edition. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Zigmond, A.S., Snaith, R.P. (1983). The Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 67, 361370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar