Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T13:45:21.407Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Memory score discrepancies by healthy middle-aged and older individuals: The contributions of age and education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 November 2009

ALEXANDRA ECONOMOU
ALEXANDRA ECONOMOU*
Affiliation:
University of Athens, Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, The University of Athens, Athens, Greece
*
*Correspondence and reprint requests: Alexandra Economou, Ph.D., Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, The University of Athens, Panepistimiopolis, Ilissia 157 84, Athens, Greece. E-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The aim of this study was to examine discrepancies between immediate/delayed recall and recall/working memory in middle-aged and older persons by age and education. Participants were 322 healthy individuals from the community who were stratified into three age and three education groups. Immediate and delayed recall distributions of WMS-III Logical Memory (LM) scores approximated normal curves, and LM savings scores showed a significant, but small, effect of age. LM (immediate, delayed) and Letter-Number Sequencing (LNS) discrepancies varied as a function of age and education. The difference between LM and LNS was not significant in the younger and less educated participants, but increased with age in the most educated group, and in the oldest group LNS exceeded LM (immediate and delayed). The results indicate deterioration in encoding and retrieval, rather than storage, with age, and show a differential, but small, effect of age and education on the memory measures. Working memory was resistant to age-related decline relative to immediate and delayed recall in the oldest, most educated group. Delayed recall–working memory discrepancy is relatively stable with age and education and may be a useful index of the onset of memory pathology across different ages and levels of education.(JINS, 2009, 15, 963–972.)

Keywords

Intraindividual variabilityAgingDemographicImmediate recallDelayed recallWorking memory
Type
Research Articles
Information
Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society , Volume 15 , Issue 6 , November 2009 , pp. 963 - 972
Copyright
Copyright © The International Neuropsychological Society 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Albert, M.S., Moss, M.B., Tanzi, R., & Jones, K. (2001). Preclinical prediction of AD using neuropsychological tests. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 631–639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ardila, A., Ostrosky-Solis, F., Rosselli, M., & Gómez, C. (2000). Age-related cognitive decline during normal aging: The complex effect of education. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 15, 495–513.Google ScholarPubMed
Bennett, D.A., Wilson, R.S., Schneider, J.A., Evans, D.A., Beckett, L.A., Aggarwal, N.T., et al. (2002). Natural history of mild cognitive impairment in older persons. Neurology, 59, 198–205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, P., Ratcliff, G., Belle, S.H., Cauley, J.A., DeKosky, S.T., & Ganguli, M. (2000). Cognitive tests that best discriminate between presymptomatic AD and those who remain nondemented. Neurology, 55, 1847–1853.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Economou, A. (2006). Intraindividual variability in memory test performance in middle aged and elderly persons from the community [Abstract]. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 12(Suppl. 1), 188.Google Scholar
Economou, A., Papageorgiou, S., & Karageorgiou, C. (2006). Working-delayed memory difference detects Mild Cognitive Impairment without being affected by age and education. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 28, 528–535.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grundman, M., Petersen, R.C., Ferris, S.H, Thomas, R.G., Aisen, P.S., Bennett, D.A., et al. for the Alzheimer’s Disease Cooperative Study. (2004). Mild cognitive impairment can be distinguished from Alzheimer’s disease and normal aging for clinical trials. Archives of Neurology, 61, 59–66.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haaland, K.Y., Price, L., & LaRue, A. (2003). What does the WMS-III tell us about memory changes with normal aging? Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, K.A., & Tulsky, D.S. (2001). The influence of IQ stratification on WAIS-III/WMS-III FSIQ-General Memory Index discrepancy base-rates in the standardization sample. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 7, 875–880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hawkins, K.A., & Tulsky, D.S. (2003). WAIS-III WMS-III discrepancy analysis: Six-factor model index discrepancy base rates, implications, and a preliminary consideration of utility. In Tulsky, D., Saklofske, D., Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G., Ivnik, R., Bornstein, R.A., Prifitera, A., & Ledbetter, M. (Eds.), Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III (pp. 211–272). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heaton, R.K., Taylor, M.J., & Manly, J. (2003). Demographic effects and use of demographically corrected norms with the WAIS-III and WMS-III. In Tulsky, D., Saklofske, D., Heaton, R.K., Chelune, G., Ivnik, R., Bornstein, R.A., Prifitera, A., & Ledbetter, M. (Eds.), Clinical interpretation of the WAIS-III and WMS-III (pp. 181–210). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hultsch, D.F., MacDonald, S.W.S., Hunter, M.A., Levy-Bencheton, J., & Straus, E. (2000). Intra-individual variability in cognitive performance in older adults: Comparison of adults with mild dementia, adults with arthritis, and healthy adults. Neuropsychology, 14, 588–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, M.W., Delis, D.C., Salmon, D.P., & Bondi, M.W. (2002). Do neuropsychological tests detect preclinical Alzheimer’s disease: Individual-test versus cognitive discrepancy score analysis. Neuropsychology, 16, 132–139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linn, R.T., Wolf, P.A., Bachman, D.L., Knoefel, J.E., Cobb, J.L., Belanger, A.J., et al. (1995). The “preclinical phase” of probable Alzheimer’s Disease. Archives of Neurology, 52, 485–490.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masur, D.M., Sliwinski, M., Lipton, R.B., Blau, A.D., & Crystal, H.A. (1994). Neuropsychological prediction of dementia and the absence of dementia in healthy elderly persons. Neurology, 44, 1427–1432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matarazzo, J.D., & Herman, D.O. (1984). Base rate data for the WAIS-R: Test-retest stability and VIQ-PIQ differences. Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology, 6, 351–366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matarazzo, J.D., & Prifitera, A. (1989). Subtest scatter and premorbid intelligence: Lessons from the WAIS-R standardization sample. Psychological Assessment, 1, 186–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mungas, D., Reed, B.R., Haan, M.N., & González, H. (2005). Spanish and English neuropsychological assessment scales: Relationship to demographics, language, cognition, and independent function. Neuropsychology, 19, 466–475.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mungas, D., Reed, B.R., Tomaszewski Farias, S., & DeCarli, C. (2009). Age and education effects on relationships of cognitive test scores with brain structure in demographically diverse older persons. Psychology and Aging, 24, 116–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, D.C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N.S., Smith, A.D., & Smith, P.K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299–320.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Salthouse, T.A., Pink, J.E., & Tucker-Drob, E.M. (2008). Contextual analysis of fluid intelligence. Intelligence, 36, 464–486.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schretlen, D.J., Munro, C.A., Anthony, J.C., & Pearlson, G.D. (2003). Examining the range of normal intraindividual variability in neuropsychological test performance. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 9, 864–870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schweizer, K., & Moosbrugger, H. (2004). Attention and working memory as predictors of intelligence. Intelligence, 32, 329–347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Small, S.A., Stern, Y., Tang, M., & Mayeux, R. (1999). Selective decline in memory function among healthy elderly. Neurology, 52, 1392–1396.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stern, Y. (2002). What is cognitive reserve? Theory and research application of the reserve concept. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 448–460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The Psychological Corporation (1997). WAIS-III WMS-III technical manual. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
Tierney, M.C., Szalai, J.P., Snow, W.G., Fisher, R.H., Nores, A., Nadon, G., et al. (1996). Predictors of probable Alzheimer’s disease in memory-impaired patients: A prospective longitudinal study. Neurology, 46, 661–665.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tuokko, H., Garrett, D.D., McDowell, I., Silverberg, N., & Kristjansson, B. (2003). Cognitive decline in high-functioning older adults: Reserve or ascertainment bias? Aging & Mental Health, 7, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wechsler, D. (1997). Wechsler Memory Scale (3rd ed.). San Antonio, Texas: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar