Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T04:51:18.871Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Long-term retention of transient news events

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 January 2000

MARGARET G. O'CONNOR
Affiliation:
Memory Disorders Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
MARY ALICE SIEGGREEN
Affiliation:
Memory Disorders Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
KRISTIE BACHNA
Affiliation:
Memory Disorders Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
BRINA KAPLAN
Affiliation:
Memory Disorders Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
LAIRD S. CERMAK
Affiliation:
Memory Disorders Research Center, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
BERNARD J. RANSIL
Affiliation:
Division of Behavioral Neurology, Department of Neurology, Harvard University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts

Abstract

Many retrospective analyses of remote memory have demonstrated recency effects in that memory for events proximal to the time of testing is superior to memory for events from remote time periods. However, the rate at which information decays over time and the specific pattern of forgetting may vary depending upon the distinct attributes of stimuli used as indices of memory. Studies examining long-term forgetting of well rehearsed, conceptually integrated information underscore preservation of remote events, some of which are thought to be permanently stored in memory. A different pattern of forgetting emerges in relation to recall of discrete facts whereby recall declines according to a negatively accelerated decay curve. In the current study long-term retention of transient news events was examined. Results were examined in relation to the effects of age and sex. All age groups demonstrated recency effects in that events from the recent past were recalled better than remote events. Age did not exert a negative influence on recall of remote or recent events with the exception of younger participants who did not recall items predating their dates of birth. Older female participants were less adept at recalling very old events than their male counterparts. (JINS, 2000, 6, 44–51.)

Type
Research Article
Copyright
© 2000 The International Neuropsychological Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)